Dose-ranging study to assess the application of intranasal 2% mupirocin calcium ointment to eradicate staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization

Surgical Infections

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 69-72

  Mehta, Maitry S ^a   Hacek, Donna M ^a   Kufner, Bridget A ^a   Price, Connie ^b   Peterson, Lance R ^a  

^a NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PENICILLIN BINDING PROTEIN 2A; PSEUDOMONIC ACID;

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENING DOSAGE; HUMAN; INFECTION CONTROL; INFECTION RISK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; MULTICENTER STUDY; NOSE SMEAR; OINTMENT; OPEN STUDY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSED FIELD GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION; TREATMENT DURATION;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRANASAL; ADULT; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CARRIER STATE; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, PULSED-FIELD; HUMANS; MUPIROCIN; NASAL CAVITY; OINTMENTS; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 84875189042     PISSN: 10962964     EISSN: 15578674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2012.086     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Styers D, Sheehan DJ, Hogan P, et al. Laboratory-based surveillance of current antimicrobial resistance patterns and trends among Staphylococcus aureus: 2005 status in the United States. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2006;5:2.
2. Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, et al. The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: Mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:166-174.
3. Kopp BJ, Nix DE, Armstrong EP. Clinical and economic analysis of methicillin-susceptible and-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:1377-1382.
4. Robicsek A, Beaumont JL, Thomson RB Jr, et al. Topical therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization: Impact on infection risk. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:623-632.
5. Singh K, Gavin PJ, Vescio T, et al. Microbiologic surveillance using nasal cultures alone is sufficient for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in neona-tes. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:2755-2757.
6. Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5:751-762.
7. Nicholson MR, Huesman LA. Controlling the usage of in-tranasal mupirocin does impact the rate of Staphylococcus aureus deep sternal wound infections in cardiac surgery patients. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:44-48.
8. Perl TM, Cullen JJ, Wenzel RP, et al. Mupirocin and the risk of Staphylococcus aureus study team: Intranasal mupirocin to prevent postoperative Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1871-1877.
9. Lucet JC, Regnier B. Screening and decolonization: Does methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus hold lessons for methicillin-resistant S. aureus? Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:585-590.
10. Bode LG, Kluytmans JA, Wertheim HF, et al. Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:9-17.
11. Hacek DM, Robb WJ, Paule SM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization in joint replacement surgery reduces infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:1349-1355.
12. Portigliatti Barbos M, Mognetti B, Pecoraro S, et al. Decolonization of orthopedic surgical team S. aureus carriers: Impact on surgical-site infections. J Orthop Traumatol 2010;11:47-49.
13. Hebert C, Robicsek A. Decolonizing therapy in infection control. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2010;Aug 23:340-345.
14. Van Rijen M, Bonten M, Wenzel R, et al. Mupirocin ointment for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections in nasal carriers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(4):CD006216.
15. Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Hacek DM, et al. Direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from adult and neonate nasal swab specimens using real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Mol Diagn 2004;6:191-196.
16. Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Thomson RB Jr, et al. Real-time PCR can rapidly detect methicillin-susceptible and methi-cillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from positive blood culture bottles. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;124:404-407.
17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Quality Manual. Second Edition. The Institute, Wayne, PA, 2008.
18. Leonard RB, Mayer J, Sasser M, et al. Comparison of MIDI Sherlock system and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in characterizing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a recent hospital outbreak. J Clin Microbiol 1995;S33:2723-2727.
19. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal dna restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: Criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233-2239.
20. Bitterman Y, Laor A, Itzhaki S, et al. Characterization of the best anatomical sites in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;29:391-397.
21. Klotz M, Zimmermann S, Opper S, et al. Possible risk for re-colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by faecal transmission. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2005;208:401-405.
22. Doebbeling BN, Breneman DL, Neu HC, et al. Elimination of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in health care workers: Analysis of six clinical trials with calcium mupirocin ointment. The Mupirocin Collaborative Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:466-474.
23. Harbarth S, Dharan S, Liassine N, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of mupirocin for eradicating carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43:1412-1416.
24. O'Grady S, Hirji Z, Pejcic-Karapetrovic B, et al. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of topical polysporin triple compound versus topical mupirocin for the eradication of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a complex continuing care population. J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2009;20:e49-e55.
25. Wertheim HF, Vos MC, Ott A, et al. Mupirocin prophylaxis against nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus infections in non-surgical patients: A randomized study. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:419-425.