A longitudinal study of administrative segregation

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 49-60

  O'Keefe, Maureen L ^a   Klebe, Kelli J ^b   Metzner, Jeffrey ^c   Dvoskin, Joel ^d   Fellner, Jamie ^e   Stucker, Alysha ^b  

^a Clinical Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Human Rights Watch   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRISON; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL ISOLATION; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLORADO; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRISONERS; PRISONS; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL ISOLATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875179360     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Haney C: A culture of harm: taming the dynamics of cruelty in supermax prisons. Crim Justice Behav 35:956-84, 2008
2. Kupers T: What to do with the survivors?-coping with the longterm effects of isolated confinement. Crim Justice Behav 35: 1005-16, 2008
3. Mears DP, Watson J: Towards a fair and balanced assessment of supermax prisons. Justice Q 23:232-70, 2006
4. Grassian S: Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement. Am J Psychiatry 140:1450-4, 1983
5. Haney C: Mental health issues in long-term solitary and "supermax" confinement. Crime Delinq 49:124-56, 2003
6. Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1995)
7. Arrigo BA, Bullock JL: The psychological effects of solitary confinement on prisoners in supermax units: reviewing what we know and recommending what should change. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 52:622-41, 2008
8. Metzner JL, Dvoskin JA: An overview of correctional psychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am 29:761-72, 2006
9. Pizarro JM, Narag RE: Supermax prisons: what we know, what we do not know, and where we are going. Prison J 88:23-42, 2008
10. Zinger I, Wichman C, Andrews DA: The psychological effects of 60 days in administrative segregation. Can J Criminol 43:47-88, 2001
11. Brodsky S, Scogin F: Inmates in protective custody: first data on emotional effects. Forensic Rep 1:267-80, 1988
12. Haney C: Infamous punishment: the psychological effects of isolation. Natl Prison Project J 8:3-21, 1993
13. Hodgins S, Côté G: The mental health of penitentiary inmates in isolation. Can J Criminol 33:175-82, 1991
14. Suedfeld P, Ramirez C, Deaton J, et al: Reactions and attributes of prisoners in solitary confinement. Crim Justice Behav 9:303-40, 1982
15. Ecclestone CEJ, Gendreau P, Knox C: Solitary confinement of prisoners: an assessment of its effects on prisoners' personal constructs and adrenocortical activity. Can J Behav Sci 6:178-91, 1974
16. Gendreau P, Bonta J: Solitary confinement is not cruel and unusual punishment: people sometimes are! Can J Criminol 26: 467-78, 1984
17. Gendreau PE, Freedman N, Wilde GJS, et al: Stimulation seeking after seven days of perceptual deprivation. Percept Mot Skills 26:547-50, 1968
18. Gendreau P, McLean R, Parsons T, et al: Effect of two days' monotonous confinement on conditioned eyelid frequency and topography. Percept Mot Skills 31:291-3, 1970
19. Gendreau PE, Freedman, N, Wilde GJS, et al: Changes in EEG alpha frequency and evoked response latency during solitary confinement. Abnorm Psychol 79:54-9, 1972
20. Andersen HS, Sestoft D, Lillebaek T, et al: A longitudinal study of prisoners on remand: psychiatric prevalence, incidence, and psychopathology in solitary vs. non-solitary confinement. Acta Psychiatr Scand 102:19-25, 2000
21. O'Keefe ML, Klebe KJ, Stucker A, et al: One year longitudinal study of the psychological effects of administrative segregation. Technical Report. CO Department of Corrections 2010. Available at http://www.doc.state.co.us/sites/default/files/opa/AdSeg Report_2010.pdf. Accessed January 5, 2011
22. Derogatis L: Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson Inc, 1993
23. Boulet J, Boss MW: Reliability and validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory. Psychol Assess 3:433-7, 1991
24. Kellett S, Beail N, Newman DW, et al: Utility of the Brief Symptom Inventory in the assessment of psychological distress. J Appl Res Intellect 16:127-34, 2003
25. Cundick BP: Review of the Brief Symptom Inventory. In: Conoley JC, Kramer JJ, eds. The Tenth Mental Measurement Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1975, p 111
26. Morlan KK, Tan S: Comparison of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory. J Clin Psychol 54:885-94, 1998
27. West BT: Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS. Eval Health Prof 32:207-28, 2009
28. Heck RH, Thomas SL, Tabata LN: Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling With IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge, 2010
29. Gottfredson GD: The Hawthorne misunderstanding (and how to get the Hawthorne effect in action research). J Res Crime Delinq 33:28-48, 1996
30. Zamble E: Behavior and adaptation in long-term prison inmates: descriptive longitudinal results. Crim Just Behav 19:409-25, 1992
31. Zamble E, Porporino FJ: Coping, imprisonment, and rehabilitation: some data and their implications. Crim Just Behav 17:53-70, 1990
32. Grassian S, Friedman N: Effects of sensory deprivation in psychiatric seclusion and solitary confinement. Int J Law Psychiatry 8:49-65, 1986
33. Lovell D, Johnson LC, Cain KC: Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington state. Crime Delinq 53:633-56, 2007
34. Toch H: Living in Prison: The Ecology of Survival. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992