Areas of climate stability of species ranges in the Brazilian cerrado: Disentangling uncertainties through time

Natureza a Conservacao

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 152-159

  Terribile, Levi Carina ^a   Lima Ribeiro, Matheus Souza ^a   Araújo, Miguel Bastos ^b,c,d   Bizão, Nair ^e   Collevatti, Rosane Garcia ^a   Dobrovolski, Ricardo ^a   Franco, Amanda Assis ^a   Guilhaumon, François ^c   Lima, Jacqueline de Souza ^a   Murakami, Devanir Mitsuyuki ^e   Nabout, João Carlos ^f   de Oliveira, Guilherme ^a   de Oliveira, Leciane Karita ^a   Rabelo, Suelen Gonçalves ^a   Rangel, Thiago Fernando ^a   Simon, Lorena Mendes ^a   Soares, Thannya Nascimento ^a   Telles, Mariana Pires de Campos ^a   Diniz Filho, José Alexandre Felizola ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso/UFMT   (Brazil)

^f UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Climate change; Climatically stable areas; Ecological niche models; Ensemble forecasting; Systematic conservation planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875172552     PISSN: 16790073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2012.025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Araújo MB et al., 2008. Quaternary climate changes explain diversity among reptiles and amphibians. Ecography, 31:8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05318.x
2. Araújo MB et al., 2011. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters, 14:484-492. PMid:21447141 PMCid:3116148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01610.x
3. Araújo MB & New M, 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in ecology & evolution, 22:42-7. PMid:17011070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
4. Araújo MB & Peterson AT, 2012. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology, 93:1527-1539. PMid:22919900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/11-1930.1
5. Ashcroft MB, 2010. Identifying refugia from climate change. Journal of Biogeography, 37:1407-1413.
6. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L & Poulsen M, 2005. Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species' current and future distributions. Ecological Modelling, 186:251-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.030
7. Collevatti et al., 2012a. Recovering the demographical history of a Brazilian savanna tree species Caryocar brasiliense: coupling ecological niche modeling and coalescent analyses. Natureza & Conservação, 10(2): 169-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2012.024
8. Collevatti RG et al., 2012b. Drawbacks to palaeodistribution modelling: the case of South American seasonally dry forests. Journal of Biogeography. In press. Available from: http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jbi.
9. Diniz-Filho JAF et al., 2009. Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. Ecography, 32:897-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06196.x
10. Diniz-Filho JAF et al., 2010. Ensemble forecasting shifts in climatically suitable areas for Tropidacris cristata (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Romaleidae). Insect Conservation and Diversity, 3(3):213-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00090.x
11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO et al., 2009. Harmonized World Soil Database. (version1.1). Rome: FAO; Laxenburg: IIASA.
12. Fjeldså J, Lambin E & Mertens B, 1999. Correlation between endemism and local ecoclimatic stability documented by comparing Andean bird distributions and remotely sensed land surface data. Ecography, 22:63-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00455.x
13. Garcia R et al., 2012. Exploring consensus in 21st century projections of climatically suitable areas for Africanvertebrates. Global Change Biology, 18:1253-1269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02605.x
14. Giovanni R et al., 2012. The real task of selecting records for ecological niche modeling. Natureza & Conservação, 10(2): 139-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2012.018
15. Graham CH, Moritz C & Williams SE, 2006. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103:632-636. PMid:16407139 PMCid:1334636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505754103
16. Graham CH et al., 2010. Dynamic refugia and species persistence: tracking spatial shifts in habitat through time. Ecography, 33:1062-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06430.x
17. Haffer J, 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science, 165:131-137. PMid:17834730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.165.3889.131
18. Hannah L et al., 2007. Protected area needs in a changing climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5:131-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[131:PANIAC]2.0.CO;2
19. Heikkinen RK et al., 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30:751-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133306071957
20. Loyola et al., 2012. Severe loss of suitable climatic conditions for marsupial species in brazil: challenges and opportunities for conservation. PlosOne, 7:1-9. PMid:23029452 PMCid:3460884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046257
21. Munguía M et al., 2012. Equilibrium of global amphibian species distributions with climate. PlosOne, 7:e34420. PMid:22511938 PMCid:3325238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034420
22. Nenzén HK & Araújo MB, 2011. Choice of threshold alters projections of species range shifts under climate change. Ecological Modelling, 222:3346-3354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.011
23. Nogués-Bravo D et al., 2008. Climate change, humans, and the extinction of the Woolly Mammoth. PLoS Biology, 6:e79. PMid:18384234 PMCid:2276529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060079
24. Pearson RG et al., 2006. Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. Journal of Biogeography, 33:1704-1711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01460.x
25. Peterson AT & Soberon J, 2012. Species Distribution Modeling and Ecological Niche Modeling: Getting the Concepts Right. Natureza & Conservação, 10(2): 102-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2012.019
26. Peterson AT et al., 2011. Ecological Niches and Geographical Distributions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Monographs in Population Biology 49.
27. Ratter JA, Bridgewater S & Ribeiro JF, 2003. Analysis of the floristic composition of the Brazilian cerrado vegetation iii: comparison of the woody vegetation of 376 areas.Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 60:57-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0960428603000064
28. Santika T, 2011. Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20: 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00581.x
29. Smith FA & Boyer AG, 2012. Losing time? Incorporating a deeper temporal perspective into modern ecology. Frontiers of Biogeography, 4.1:26-39.
30. Werneck FP et al., 2012. Climatic stability in the Brazilian Cerrado: implications for biogeographical connections of SouthRangesAmerican savannas, species richness and conservation in a biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Biogeography, 39:1695-1706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02715.x
31. Williams JW & Jackson ST, 2007. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Frontiers in Ecologyand the Environment, 5:475-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/070037
32. Williams SE et al., 2008. Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. Plos Biology, 6:2621-2626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060325