The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda

Business Ethics Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 709-737

  Whelan, Glen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Corporate governance; Globalization; Habermas; Multinational corporations; Political corporate social responsibility; Rawls

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875150505     PISSN: 1052150X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5840/beq201222445     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C.A., & Ganapathi, J. 2007. Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 836-63.
2. Amazon Web Services. 2010. Blog Posting. Amazon Web Services Blog (December 2). Available from http://aws.amazon.com/message/65348/. Accessed May 5, 2011.
3. Amnesty International. 2010. Google stops its censorship in China: Amnesty response. Amnesty News (January 13). Available from http://www.amnesty. org.uk/news-details.asp?NewsID=18572. Accessed November 16, 2010.
4. Angle, S. C. 2005. Decent democratic centralism. Political Theory, 33(4): 518-46.
5. Berle, Jr., A. A. 1932. For whom corporate managers are trustees: A note. Harvard Law Review, 45(7): 1365-72.
6. Bernstein, A. R. 2007. Human rights, global justice, and disaggregated states: John Rawls, Onora O'Neill and Anne-Marie Slaughter. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66(1): 87-111
7. Blanchfield, L. 2011. The United Nations Human Rights Council: Issues for Congress. CRS report for Congress, 7-5700 (January 26). Available from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33608.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2011.
8. Blowfield, M. 2005. Corporate social responsibility: The failing discipline and why it matters for international relations. International Relations, 19(2): 173-91.
9. Boatright, J. R. 2006. What's wrong-and what's right-with stakeholder management. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(2): 106-30.
10. Boddewyn, J. J., & Brewer, T. L. 1995. International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 119-43.
11. Bonardi, J.-P., Hillman, A., & Keim, G. 2005. The attractiveness of political markets: Implication for firm strategies. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 397-413.
12. Bowie, N. E. 1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
13. BP. N.D. Website. http://bp.com. Accessed June 16, 2012.
14. Bull, H. 1995. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics (2nd ed.). Houndsmills, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
15. Bull, H., & Watson, A. (Eds.) 1984. The expansion of international society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights (BLIHR). 2008. Statement of support for Ruggie's protect, respect and remedy framework. Available from http://198.170.85.29/ BLIHR-statement-Ruggie-report-2008.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2009.
17. Cohen, C. L. 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin and B. Pettit (Eds.). The good polity: 17-34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. 2007. Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8): 649-67.
19. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2008. Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., & Ro, J.-P. 2007. The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2): 169-87.
21. Detomasi, D. A. 2007. The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3): 321-34.
22. DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment: 3-21. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
23. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 252-84.
24. Downs, A. 1957. An Economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Drezner, D. W. 2007. All politics is global. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
26. Drummond, D. 2010. A new approach to China. The official Google blog (January 12). Available from http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new- approach-to-china.html. Accessed November 16, 2010.
27. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
28. Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.). Ethical theory in business (3rd Edition): 97-106. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
29. Freeman, S. 2007. Rawls. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
30. Friedman, M. 1982. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Gienger, V., & Capaccio, T. 2010. Clinton condemns WikiLeaks release as 'attack' on U.S. efforts. Bloomberg Business Week (November 29). Available from http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-11-29/clinton-condemns-wikileaks- release-as-attack-on-u-s-efforts.html. Accessed May 5, 2011.
32. Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. 2011. Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1): 23-44.
33. Gilpin, R. 2001. Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
34. Global Business Initiative on Human Rights (GBI). 2010. Statement of support for Ruggie's draft guiding principles (December 10). Available from http://www.global-business-initiative.org/srsg/ GBI%20Statement%20Dec%2010%202010.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2011.
35. Global Network Initiative. N.D. Website. http://www. globalnetworkinitiative.org/. Accessed December 6, 2010.
36. Goldsmith, J., & Wu, T. 2008. Who controls the internet? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Gourevitch, P. A., & Shinn, J. 2005. Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
38. Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, trans. T. Burger and F. Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39. Moral consciousness and communicative action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge: Polity Press.
40. -. 1995. Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(3): 109-31.
41. -. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
42. -. 1998. Remarks on legitimation through human rights. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 24(2/3): 157-71.
43. -. 2001. The postnational constellation: Political essays, trans. M. Pensky. Cambridge: Polity.
44. -. 2008. Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity.
45. -. 2009. Europe: The faltering project. Cambridge: Polity.
46. Haufler, V. 2010. Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3): 53-73.
47. Heath, J. 2001. Communicative action and rational choice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
48. Heath, J., & Norman, W. 2004. Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247-65.
49. Hotten, R. 2010. Google's rift with China is a calculated business risk. BBC News (March 26). Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8587129. stm. Accessed November 16, 2010.
50. Hsieh, N.-h. 2009. Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2): 251-73.
51. Hu, J., 2005. Build towards a harmonious world of lasting peace and common prosperity. Speech delivered at the High-Level Plenary Meeting of the United Nations 60th session, New York (September 15). Available from http://sy.chineseembassy.org/eng/xwfb/t213754.htm. Accessed February 17, 2010.
52. Human Rights Watch. 2011. UN Human Rights Council: Weak stance on business standards. Human Rights Watch News (June 16). Available from http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/06/16/un-human-rights-council-weak-stance- business-standards. Accessed June 17, 2011.
53. Jerbi, S. 2011. UN adopts guiding principles on business and human rights-what comes next? Institute for human rights and business. Staff Commentary (June 17). Available from http://www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/un- adopts-guiding-principles-on-business-and-human-rights.html. Accessed June 17, 2011.
54. Kant, I. 2006 (1784). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In P. Kleingeld (Ed.), Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace and History, trans. D. L. Colclasure: 17-23. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
55. Keohane, R. O. 1984. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
56. Keping, Y. 2008. Ideological change and incremental democracy in reform-era China. In C. Li (Ed.), China's changing political landscape: Prospects for democracy: 44-58. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
57. Kobrin, S. J. 2005. Multinational corporations, the protest movement, and the future of global governance. In A. D. Chandler Jr. & B. Mazlish (eds.), Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history: 219-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. -. 2009. Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3): 349-74.
59. Krasner, S. D. 1991. Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics, 43(3): 336-66.
60. Lea, D. 2004. The imperfect nature of corporate responsibilities to stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2): 201-17.
61. Levy, S. 2011. Inside Google's China misfortune. Fortune (April 15). Available from http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/04/15/googles-ordeal-in-china/. Accessed June 6, 2011.
62. Maitland, I. 2001. Distributive justice in firms: Do the rules of corporate governance matter? Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 129-43.
63. Marcoux, A. M. 2003. A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1): 1-24.
64. Matten, D., & Crane, A. 2005. Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166-79.
65. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 117-27.
66. McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D. D., & Cory, K. D. 2002. Raising rivals' costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5): 707-23.
67. Mearsheimer, J. J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
68. Meyer, J. W., Drori, G. S., & Hwang, H. 2006. World society and the proliferation of formal organization. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer & H. Hwang (Eds.): 25-49. Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340-63.
70. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2005. Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 429-53.
71. Moon, J. D. 2003. Rawls and Habermas on public reason: Human rights and global justice. Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 257-74.
72. Néron, P.-Y., & Norman, W. 2008. Citizenship, inc.: Do we really want businesses to be good corporate citizens? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1): 1-26.
73. Nike. 2005. Restated articles of incorporation of Nike, Inc. (as amended September 23 2005. Available from http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/ data/320187/000032018705000124/exhibit-3-1.txt. Accessed June 13, 2012.
74. Noland, J., & Phillips, R. 2010. Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 39-49.
75. Novo-Nordisk. Website. http://www.novonordisk.com. Accessed June 16, 2012.
76. Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
77. Nussbaum, M.C. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145-79.
79. O'Neill, O. 1989. Constructions of reason: Explorations of Kant's practical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. -. 2000. Bounds of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. -. 2001. Agents of justice. Metaphilosophy, 32(1/2): 180-95.
82. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. 2006. Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1): 71-88.
83. PayPal. 2010. PayPal statement regarding WikiLeaks. PayPal Blog (December 2). Available from https://www.thepaypalblog.com/2010/12/paypal-statement- regarding-wikileaks/. Accessed May 5, 2011.
84. Purdy, R. 2009. Using earth observation technologies for better regulatory compliance and enforcement of environmental laws. Journal of Environmental Law, 22(1): 59-87.
85. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. -. 1999a. The idea of public reason revisited. In J. Rawls, The law of peoples, with "the idea of public reason revisited": 131-80. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
87. -. 1999b. The law of peoples. In J. Rawls, The law of peoples, with "the idea of public reason revisited": 3-128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
88. -. 2001. Justice as fairness: a restatement. Delhi: Universal Law Publishing.
89. -. 2005. Political liberalism (expanded ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
90. Reporters without Borders. 2010. Google rebels against China's internet censors. Press release (January 14). Available from http://en.rsf.org/china- google-rebels-against-china-s-14-01-2010,36059. Accessed November 16, 2010.
91. Roach, B. 2005. A primer on multinational corporations. In A. D. Chandler Jr. & B. Mazlish (Eds.), Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history: 19-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. ROCIC (Regulator of Community Interest Companies). 2007. Community interest companies: Briefing pack. Cardiff: TROCIC. Available from http://www.network2012. net/community/resources/cicreg-cic-briefing-pack.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2009.
93. -. 2010. Annual report 2009-10. Available from http://www.cicregulator. gov.uk/news/Annual%20Report/Annual%20Report%202009-10-%20Final.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2011.
94. Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, relativism and truth: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. -. 1993. Putnam and the relativist menace. The Journal of Philosophy, 90(9): 443-61.
96. Ruggie, J. G. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2): 379-415.
97. -. 1998. What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization, 52(4): 855-85.
98. -. 2003. Taking embedded liberalism global: The corporate connection. In D. Held & M. Koenig-Archibugi (Eds.), Taming globalization: Frontiers of governance: 93-129. Cambridge: Polity.
99. -. 2004. Reconsituting the global public domain: Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4): 499-529.
100. -. 2008a. Embedding global markets: An enduring challenge. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.
101. -. 2008b. Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc A/HRC/8/5 (April 7).
102. -. 2011. Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations "protect, respect and remedy" framework. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc A/HRC/17/31 (March 21).
103. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate social responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1096-1120.
104. -. 2008. Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: 413-31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. -. 2010. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4): 899-931.
106. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. 2006. Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4): 505-32.
107. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. 2009. Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3): 327-47.
108. Schmidt, E., & Cohen, J. 2010. The digital disruption. Foreign Affairs, 89(6): 75-85.
109. Scholte, J. A. 2005. Globalization: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
110. Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111. Smith, A. 1986 (1776). The wealth of nations-Books I-III. London: Penguin Classics.
112. Smith, C. 2006. Statement. The internet in China: A tool for freedom or suppression? Joint Hearing, House of Representatives, 109th Congress, Second Session (February 15). Available from http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ archives/109/26075.pdf. Accessed 15/11/2010.
113. Social Investment Forum Foundation. 2010. Report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Available from http://ussif.org/ resources/. Accessed June 24, 2011.
114. Stout, L. 2012. The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
115. Tan, K.-C. 2006. The problem of decent peoples. In R. Martin & D. A. Reidy (Eds). Rawls's law of peoples: A realistic utopia?: 76-94. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
116. Tierney, B. 1982. Religion, law, and the growth of constitutional thought, 1150-1650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2010. World investment report 2010: Investing in a low-carbon economy. New York: United Nations Publications.
118. van Oosterhout, J. (Hans). 2008. Transcending the confines of economic and political organization: The misguided metaphor of corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1): 35-42.
119. WBCSD & WZB (World Business Council for Sustainable Development & Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung). 2003. Intellectual property rights in biotechnology and healthcare: Results of a stakeholder dialogue. Switzerland: WBCSD.
120. Wenar, L. 2006. Why Rawls is not a cosmopolitan egalitarian. In R. Martin & D. A. Reidy (Eds.). Rawls's law of peoples: A realistic utopia?: 95-113. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
121. Whelan, G., Moon, J., & Orlitzky, M. 2009. Human rights, transnational corporations and embedded liberalism: What chance consensus? Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (Supplement 2): 367-83.
122. Willke, H., & Willke, G. 2008. Corporate moral legitimacy and the legitimacy of morals: A critique of Palazzo/Scherer's communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics 81(1): 27-38.