Single-source tumor documentation - Reusing oncology data for different purposes

Onkologie

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 136-141

  Ries, Markus ^a   Prokosch, Hans Ulrich ^a   Beckmann, Matthias W ^b   Bürkle, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cancer; Dataset; Information technology; Single source; Tumor documentation

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER PALLIATIVE THERAPY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER STAGING; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KIDNEY CANCER; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OUTPATIENT CARE; PROSTATE CANCER; QUALITY CONTROL;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DOCUMENTATION; GERMANY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84875141652     PISSN: 0378584X     EISSN: 14230240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000348528     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boyle P, Levin B: World cancer report. Lyon, IARC Press, 2008.
2. TM. Cancer Informatics 2006;22:22-24.
3. Califano A, Chinnaiyan AM, Duyk GM, Gambhir SS, Hubbard T, Lipman DJ, Stein LD, Wang JY, Bartlett OT, Harris CL: An assessment of the impact of the NCI Cancer Biomedical Informatics GRID (caBIG); 2011. http://arc.georgetown. edu/BSAcaBIGAssessment.pdf.
4. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY: The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:683-690.
5. Australian Government: A National Cancer Data Strategy for Australia. Barton. http://www.cancer-australia.gov.au/sites/default/files/user-upload/ publications/ncds-final-web.pdf
6. Grundmann E, Wagner G, Hermanek P, Wächter W, Altmann U, Dudeck J: Basisdokumentation für Tumorkranke, 5th ed. München, Zuckschwerdt, 1999.
7. Does the UK really have an effective cancer plan? Revisited. Lancet oncol 2009;10:305.
8. Evrard S: Enhancing patient safety and quality of surgical cancer care: The French National Cancer Plans. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010;36:S14-17.
9. Zylka-Menhorn V: Nationaler Krebsplan: Startschuss für einen mehrjährigen Prozess. Dtsch Arztebl 2008;105:A-1431.
10. Beckmann K, Jud S, Heusinger K, Schwenk M, Bayer C, Häberle L, Beckmann MW: Dokumentation in der gynäkologischen Onkologie. Gynäkologe 2010;43:400-410.
11. Datensparsame einheitliche Tumordokumentation-eine Kernforderung des Nationalen Krebsplans. Berlin, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, 2011. http://www.bmg.bund.de/fileadmin/dateien/Downloads/N/Nationaler -Krebsplan/Papier-zur- Tumordokumentation-101011.pdf
12. Beckmann MW, Brucker C, Hanf V, Rauh C, Bani MR, Knob S, Petsch S, Schick S, Fasching PA, Hartmann A, Lux MP, Häberle L: Quality assured health care in certified breast centers and improvement of the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Onkologie 2011;34:362-367.
13. Altmann U, Katz FR, Dudeck J: A reference model for clinical tumour documentation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006;124:139-144.
14. Ries M, Golcher H, Prokosch H, Beckmann MW, Bürkle T: An EMR based cancer diary-Utilisation and initial usability evaluation of a new cancer data visualization tool. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012.
15. Mate S, Bürkle T, Köpcke F, Breil B, Wullich B, Dugas M, Prokosch H, Ganslandt T: Populating the i2b2 Database with heterogeneous EMR data: A semantic network approach. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;169:502-506.
16. Ganslandt T, Mate S, Helbing K, Sax U, Prokosch H: Unlocking data for clinical research-The German i2b2 experience. Appl Clin Informatics 2011;2:116-127.
17. Chahal AP: Informatics in Clinical Research in Oncology. Cancer J 2011;17:239-245.
18. Lau EC, Mowat FS, Kelsh MA, Legg JC, Engel-Nitz NM, Watson HN, Collins HL, Nordyke RJ, Whyte JL: Use of electronic medical records (EMR) for oncology outcomes research: assessing the comparability of EMR information to patient registry and health claims data. Clin Epidemiol 2011;3:259-272.
19. Ochs MF, Casagrande JT: Information systems for cancer research. Cancer Invest 2008;26:1060-1067.
20. Kunz I, Lin M, Frey L: Metadata mapping and reuse in caBIG. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10 Suppl 2:S4.
21. Papatheodorou I, Crichton C, Morris L, Maccallum P, Davies J, Brenton JD, Caldas C: A metadata approach for clinical data management in translational genomics studies in breast cancer. BMC Med Genomics 2009;2:66.
22. Sioutos N, de Coronado S, Haber MW, Hartel FW, Shaiu W, Wright LW: NCI Thesaurus: A semantic model integrating cancer-related clinical and molecular information. J Biomed Inform 2007;40: 30-43.
23. Zünkeler M, Schlag PM: Regionale Verbünde in der Onkologie. Onkologe 2009;15:1070-1081.
24. Lordick F, Beiglböck A, Jäger D, Siewert JR: Multi-disziplinarität im Cancer Center; in: Siewert JR, Rothmund M, Schumpelick V (eds): Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie, 3rd ed. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2010, pp 201-211.
25. Brucker S, Krainick-Strobel U, Bamberg M, Aydeniz B, Wagner U, Du Bois A, Claussen C, Kreienberg R, Wallwiener D: Brustzentren. Rationale, funktionelles Konzept, Definition und Zertifizierung. Gynakologe 2003;36:862-877.
26. Brucker S, Traub J, Krainick-Strobel U, Schreer I, Kreienberg R, Bamberg M, Jonat W, Wallwiener D: Brustzentren Entwicklung in Deutschland. Onkologe 2005;11:285-297.
27. Seegenschmiedt M, Karstens J: Wesentliche Instrumente in der Qualitätssicherung onkologischer Einrichtungen. Onkologe 2005;11:1253-1268.
28. Zemlin C, Herrmann-Lingen C, Wiegard K, Kleiber C, Kolb-Niemann B, Lubbe D, Schade-Brittinger C, Wagner U, Albert US: Implementation of a computer and screening-based psycho-oncological clinical pathway. Geburtsh Frauen-heilk 2011;10:853-861
29. Dugas M, Lange M, Muller-Tidow C, Kirchhof P, Prokosch H: Routine data from hospital information systems can support patient recruitment for clinical studies. Clin Trials 2010;7:183-189.