Resolving environmental issues in the southern Brazilian artisanal penaeid-trawl fishery through adaptive co-management

Marine Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2013, Pages 133-141

  Silva, Catarina N S ^a   Broadhurst, Matt K ^b   Medeiros, Rodrigo P ^c   Dias, José H ^c  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adaptive co management; Artisanal fishery; Brazil; Fisheries management; Penaeid trawl; Sustainable fisheries

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ARTISANAL FISHERY; COMANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84875122433     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2010 2010, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p. 1-218.
2. IBAMA Estatística da Pesca 2007, Brazil-Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação 2007, Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renováveis, Brasília, p. 113.
3. Diegues AC. Artisanal fisheries in Brazil 2006, International Collective in Support of Fishworkers, Chennai, p. 72.
4. Vasconcellos M, Diegues AC, Sales RR. Limites e possibilidades na gestão da pesca artesanal costeira. Nas redes da pesca artisanal 2007, 15-83. IBAMA/PNUD, Brasília. A.L. Costa (Ed.).
5. Vasconcellos M, Diegues AC, Kalikoski DC. Coastal fisheries of Brazil. Coastal fisheries of Latin America and the Caribbean 2011, 73-116. FAO, Rome, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 544. S. Salas, R. Chuenpagdee, A. Charles, J.C. Seijo (Eds.).
6. Asmus ML, Kitzmann D, Laydner C. Tagliani CRA. Gestão Costeira no Brasil: instrumentos, fragilidades e potencialidades. Gerenciamento Costeiro Integrado 2006, 4:52-57.
7. Holling CS, Meffe GK. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 1996, 10(2):328-337.
8. Holling CS, Berkes F, Folke C. Science, sustainability and resource management. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience 1998, 342-362. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. F. Berkes, C. Folke (Eds.).
9. Degnbol P, Gislason H, Hanna S, Jentoft S, Raakjar Nielsen J, Sverdrup-Jensen S, et al. Painting the floor with a hammer: technical fixes in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2006, 30(5):534-543.
10. Sen S, Nielsen JR. Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis. Mar Policy 1996, 20(5):405-418.
11. Berkes F, George P, Preston R. Co-management: the evolution of the theory and practice of joint administration of living resources. Alternatives 1991, 18(2):12-18.
12. Pomeroy RS, Berkes F. Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Mar Policy 1997, 21(5):465-480.
13. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institution for collective action 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 298.
14. Ostrom E. Understanding institutional diversity 2005, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p. 355.
15. Garcia S., Charles A. Fishery systems and linkages: implications for science and governance. Ocean Coast Manage 2008, 51(7):505-527.
16. Gunderson LH, Holling CS. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems 2002, Island Press, Washington, p. 532.
17. Hughes TP, Gunderson LH, Folke C, et al. Adaptive management of the great barrier reef and the grand canyon world heritage areas. AMBIO J Hum Environ 2007, 36(7):586-592.
18. Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N. Introduction: moving beyond co-management. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance 2007, 1-18. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver. D. Armitage, F. Berkes, N. Doubleday (Eds.).
19. Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environ Change 2008, 18(1):86-98.
20. Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 2009, 90(5):1692-1702.
21. Berkes F, Mahon R, McConney P, Pollnac R, Pomeroy R. Managing small-scale fisheries: alternative directions and methods 2001, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, p. 261.
22. Wilson DC, Nielsen JR, Degnbol P. The fisheries co-management experience: accomplishments, challenges, and prospects 2003, 26. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Fish and Fisheries, p. 348.
23. Kaplan I, McCay BJ. Cooperative research, co-management and the social dimension of fisheries science and management. Mar Policy 2004, 28(3):257-258.
24. Carlsson L, Berkes F. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. J Environ Manage 2005, 75:65-76.
25. Berkes F. Implementing ecosystem-based management: evolution or revolution?. Fish Fish 2012, 13(4):465-476.
26. Fennell D, Plummer R, Marschke M. Is adaptive co-management ethical?. J Environ Manage 2008, 88(1):62-75.
27. Kalikoski DC, Seixas CS, Almundi T. Gestão compartilhada e comunitária da pesca no Brasil: Avanços e Desafios. Ambiente e Sociedade 2009, 12(1):151-172.
28. Seixas CS, Kalikoski DC. Gestão participativa da pesca no Brasil: levantamento das iniciativas e documentação dos processos. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 2009, 20:119-139.
29. Scherer MEG, Asmus M, Filet M, Sanches M, Poleti AE. El manejo costero en Brasil: análisis de la situación y propuestas para una posible mejora. La gestión integrada de zonas costeras. Algo más que una ordenación del litoral revisada? 2011, 161-173. IIDL/Publicaciones de la Universitad de Valencia, Valĉncia. J. Farinós (Ed.).
30. Seixas CS, Kalikoski DC, Almudi T., et al. Gestão compartilhada do uso de recursos pesqueiros no Brasil: elementos para um programa nacional. Ambiente e Sociedade 2011, 14:23-44.
31. Diegues AC. Pescadores, Camponeses e Trabalhadores do Mar 1983, Editora Ática, São Paulo, p. 287.
32. CEMBRA-Centro de Excelĉncia para o Mar Brasileiro. O mar no século XXI: relatório aos tomadores de decisão. Base Hidrográfica da Marinha, Niterói, 2012, p. 540.
33. Abdallah PR. Bacha CJC. Evolução da atividade pesqueira no brasil: 1960-1994. Teoria e Evidĉncia EconÔmica 1999, 7(13):9-24.
34. UNIVALI Boletim estatística da pesca industrial de Santa Catarina-Ano 2009 e panorama 2000-2009: programa de monitoramento e avaliação da atividade pesqueira industrial no sudeste e sul do Brasil 2010, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, Itajaí, p. 97.
35. Dias Neto J. Proposta de plano nacional de gestão para o uso sustentável de camarões marinhos do Brasil 2011, MMA/IBAMA, Brasília, p. 1-243.
36. Viana JP, Castello L, Damasceno JMB., et al. Manejo comunitário do Pirarucu Arapaima gigas na reserva de desenvolvimento sustentável Mamirauá-Amazonas, Brasil. Áreas aquáticas protegidas como instrumentos de gestão pesqueira 2007, 249-271. Série Áreas Naturais Protegidas 4. MMA/SBF, Brasília. A.P. Prates, D. Blanc (Eds.).
37. UNCED. Agenda 21: Earth Summit-The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. In: United Nations conference on environment and development: Rio de Janeiro; 1993. p. 300.
38. Avritzer L. Sociedade civil, instituições participativas e representação: da autorização à legitimidade da ação. Dados 2007, 50(3):443-464.
39. Borba J, Sell CE. Movimentos sociais, participacão e democracia: contexto e perspectivas de debate no Brasil. Poliótica e Sociedade 2007, 6(11):7-18.
40. MPA Boletim Estatístico da Pesca e Aquicultura, Brasil 2010 2012, Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura, Brasília, p. 128.
41. Gillett R. Global study of shrimp fisheries. FAO fisheries technical paper no. 475; 2008. p. 359.
42. Andriguetto-Filho JM, Krul R, Feitosa S. Analysis of natural and social dynamics of fishery production systems in Paraná, Brazil: implications for management and sustainability. J Appl Ichthyol 2009, 25:277-286.
43. Simões SM, Costa RC, Fransozo A, Castilho AL. Diel variation in abundance and size of the seabob shrimp Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (Crustacea, Penaeoidea) in the Ubatuba region, Southeastern Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciĉncias 2010, 82(2):369-378.
44. Silva CNS, Broadhurst MK, Schwingel A, Dias JH, Cattani AP, Spach HL. Refining a Nordmøre-grid for a Brazilian artisanal penaeid-trawl fishery. Fish Res 2011, 109:168-178.
45. Silva CNS, Broadhurst MK, Dias JH, Cattani AP, Spach HL. The effects of Nordmøre-grid bar spacings on catches in a Brazilian artisanal shrimp fishery. Fish Res 2012, 127-128:188-193.
46. Silva CNS, Dias JH, Cattani AP, Spach HL. Selectivity of square-mesh codends in an artisanal fishery in southern Brazil. Lat Am J Aquat Res 2012, 40(1):124-133.
47. Andrew NL, Pepperell JG. The by-catch of shrimp trawl fisheries. Oceanogr Mar Biol 1992, 30:527-565.
48. Alverson DL, Freeberg MH, Murawski SA, Pope JG. A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards 1994, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 339, p. 233.
49. Kelleher K. Discards in the world's marine fisheries. An update 2005, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 470, p. 131.
50. Carniel VL. Interação de aves costeiras com descartes oriundos da pesca artesanal no litoral centro-sul paranaense. Master thesis in Zoology, Setor de Ciĉncias Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba; 2008. p. 80.
51. Cattani AP. Avaliação de dispositivos de redução de captura incidental na pesca de arrasto do município de Pontal do Paraná-PR. Master thesis in coastal and oceanic systems, Setor de Ciĉncias Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba; 2010. p. 147.
52. Cattani AP, Santos L de O, Spach HL, Budel BR. Guanais JHDG. Avaliação da ictiofauna da fauna acompanhante da pesca do camarão sete-barbas do município de Pontal do Paraná, litoral do Paraná. Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 2011, 37:247-260.
53. Hall MA. On bycatches. Rev Fish Biol Fish 1996, 6:319-352.
54. Lewison RL, Soykan CU, Cox T, et al. Ingredients for addressing the challenges of fisheries bycatch. Bull Mar Sci 2011, 87(2):235-250.
55. Kaiser MJ, de Groot SJ. The effects of fishing on non-target species and habitats: biological conservation and socio-economic issues 2000, Blackwell Science, Oxford, p. 399.
56. Valdemarsen JW, Suuronen P. Modifying fishing gear to achieve ecosystem objectives. Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem 2003, 321-341. FAO, Rome. M. Sinclair, G. Valdimarsson (Eds.).
57. Priour D. Numerical optimisation of trawls design to improve their energy efficiency. Fish Res 2009, 98:40-50.
58. Suuronen P, Chopin F, Glass C, Løkkeborg S, Matsushita Y, Queirolo D, et al. Low impact and fuel efficient fishing: looking beyond the horizon. Fish Res 2012, 119-120:135-146.
59. Tucker AD, Robbins JB, McPhee DP. Adopting turtle excluder devices in Australia and the United States: what are the differences in technology transfer, promotion and acceptance?. Coast Manage 1997, 25:405-421.
60. Broadhurst MK, Kennelly SJ, Gray CA. Strategies for improving the selectivity of fishing gears. By-catch reduction in the world's fisheries 2007, 1-18. Springer-Verlag Inc, Dordrecht. S.J. Kennelly (Ed.).
61. Hall MA, Nakano H, Clarke S, et al. Working with fishers to reduce bycatches. By-catch reduction in the world's fisheries 2007, 235-288. Springer-Verlag Inc, Dordrecht. S.J. Kennelly (Ed.).
62. Hauzer M, Dearden P, Murray G. The effectiveness of community-based governance of small-scale fisheries, Ngazidja island, Comoros. Mar Policy 2013, 38:346-354.
63. Broadhurst M.K. Modifications to reduce bycatch in prawn trawls: a review and framework for development. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2000, 10:27-60.
64. Broadhurst MK, Suuronen P, Hulme A. Estimating collateral mortality from towed fishing gear. Fish Fish 2006, 7:180-218.
65. Kennelly SJ, Broadhurst MK. Bycatch begone: changes in the philosophy of fishing technology. Fish Fish 2002, 3:340-355.
66. Sumpton WD, Smith PJ, Robotham BG. The influence on catch of monofilament and multifilament netting in otter prawn-trawls. Fish Res 1989, 8:35-44.
67. Broadhurst MK, McShane PE, Larsen RB. Effects of twine diameter and mesh size in the body of prawn trawls on bycatch in Gulf St. Vincent, Australia. Fish B-NOAA 2000, 98:463-473.
68. Sterling D, Eayrs S. Trawl-gear innovations to improve the efficiency of Australian prawn trawling. In: First international symposium on fishing vessel energy efficiency E-fishing: Vigo; 2010. p. 5.
69. Foster SJ, Vincent ACJ. Tropical shrimp trawl fisheries: fishers' knowledge of and attitudes about a doomed fishery. Mar Policy 2010, 34:437-446.
70. Conolly PC. Bycatch activities in Brazil. International conference on shrimp bycatch 1922, 291-302. Southeastern Fisheries Association, Tallahassee. R.P. Jones (Ed.).
71. Harrington D, Vendetti RA. Shrimp trawl bycatch reduction in the Southeastern United States. In: Solving bycatch: considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program report no. 96-03, University of Alaska Fairbanks: 1995. p. 129-136.
72. Watson JW. Summary report on the status of bycatch reduction devices development 1996, NOAA, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi.
73. Rogers DR, Rogers BD, de Silva JA, Wright VL. Effectiveness of four industry-developed bycatch reduction devices in Louisiana's inshore waters. Fish Bull 1997, 95:552-565.
74. Pettovello AD. By-catch in the Patagonian red shrimp (Pleoticus muelleri) fishery. Mar Freshwater Res 1999, 50:123-127.
75. Broadhurst MK, Millar RB. Square-mesh codend circumference and selectivity. ICES J Mar Sci 2009, 66:566-572.
76. Brewer D, Rawlinson N, Eayrs S, Burridge C. An assessment of bycatch reduction devices in a tropical Australian prawn trawl fishery. Fish Res 1998, 36:195-215.
77. Broadhurst MK, Sterling DJ, Cullis BR. Effects of otter boards on catches of an Australian penaeid trawl. Fish Res 2012, 131-133:67-75.
78. Brabeck S. SkySails-new energy for fishing trawlers. In: first international symposium on fishing vessel energy efficiency E-fishing: Vigo; 2010. p. 8.
79. De Moura RL, Minte-Vera CV, Curado IB, et al. Challenges and prospects of fisheries co-management under a marine extractive reserve framework in Northeastern Brazil. Coast Manage 2009, 37(6):617-632.
80. Seixas CS, Minte-Vera CV, Ferreira RG, et al. Co-managing commons: advancing aquatic resource management in Brazil. Current trends in human ecology 2009, 156-182. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge. P.F. Lopes, A. Begossi (Eds.).
81. Medeiros RP. Possibilidades e obstáculos à co-gestão adaptativa de sistemas pesqueiros artesanais: estudo de caso na área da Baía de Tijucas, litoral centro-norte do Estado de Santa Catarina, no período de 2004 a 2008. Doctoral thesis in political sociology, Centro de Filosofia e Ciĉncias Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis; 2009. p. 330.
82. Tallis H, Levin PS, Ruckelshaus M, Lester SE, McLeod KL, Fluharty DL, et al. The many faces of ecosystem-based management: making the process work today in real places. Mar Policy 2010, 34:340-348.
83. Garaway CJ, Arthur RI. Adaptive learning: a practical framework for the implementation of adaptive co-management-lessons from selected experiences in South and Southeast Asia 2004, MRAG Ltd, London, p. 44.