Commentary on "Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores"

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 74-83

  Brennan, Robert L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875082997     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: 17453984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12001     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. American Psychological Association (APA) (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. APA Committee on Test Standards (1952). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: Preliminary proposal. American Psychologist, 7, 461-475.
3. Brennan, R. L. (2001a). An essay on the history and future of reliability from the perspective of replications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 295-317.
4. Brennan, R. L. (2001b). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
5. Brennan, R. L. (2006). Perspectives on the evolution and future of educational measurement. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 1-16). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 292-334.
7. Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 443-507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
8. Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In R. E. Linn (Ed.), Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy (pp. 147-171). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418.
12. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York, NY: Wiley.
13. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
14. Cureton, E. E. (1951). Validity. In E. F. Lindquist (Ed. ), Educational measurement (pp. 621-694). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
15. Ebel, R. (1961). Must all tests be valid? American Psychologist, 16, 640-647.
16. Guion, R. M. (1980). On trinitarian conceptions of validity. Professional Psychology, 11, 385-398.
17. House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Kane, M. T. (1982a). A sampling model for validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 125-160.
19. Kane, M. T. (1982b). The validity of licensure examinations. American Psychologist, 37, 911-918.
20. Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validation. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527-535.
21. Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17-64), Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
22. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
23. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
24. Shepard, L. A. (1993). Evaluating test validity. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 405-450). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.