The Utility of Micro-CT and MRI in the Assessment of Longitudinal Growth of Liver Metastases in a Preclinical Model of Colon Carcinoma

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 430-439

  Pandit, Prachi ^a   Johnston, Samuel M ^a   Qi, Yi ^a   Story, Jennifer ^b   Nelson, Rendon ^a   Johnson, G Allan ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Piedmont Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

CT; Liver metastases; Mice; MR; PROPELLER

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER MODEL; COLON CARCINOMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER METASTASIS; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PERIODICALLY ROTATED OVERLAPPING PARALLEL LINES WITH ENHANCED RECONSTRUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

ANIMALS; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, NUDE; MICRORADIOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84875078605     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.09.030     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225-249.
2. Zhao S., Moore J.V., Waller M.L., et al. Positron emission tomography of murine liver metastases and the effects of treatment by combretastatin A-4. Eur J Nucl Med 1999, 26:231-238.
3. Inoue Y., Izawa K., Tojo A., et al. Monitoring of disease progression by bioluminescence imaging and magnetic resonance imaging in an animal model of hematologic malignancy. Exp Hematol 2007, 35:407-415.
4. Smakman N., Martens A., Kranenburg O., et al. Validation of bioluminescence imaging of colorectal liver metastases in the mouse. J Surg Res 2004, 122:225-230.
5. Martiniova L., Schimel D., Lai E.W., et al. In vivo micro-CT imaging of liver lesions in small animal models. Methods 2009, 50:20-25.
6. Baboi L., Pilleul F., Milot L., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of liver growth of neuroendocrine tumors in an experimental mouse model. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 28:264-272.
7. Cai S.R., Garbow J.R., Culverhouse R., et al. A mouse model for developing treatment for secondary liver tumors. Int J Oncol 2005, 27:113-120.
8. Kalber T.L., Waterton J.C., Griffiths J.R., et al. Longitudinal in vivo susceptibility contrast MRI measurements of LS174T colorectal liver metastasis in nude mice. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28:1451-1458.
9. Badea C.T., Hedlund L.W., Johnson G.A. Micro-CT with respiratory and cardiac gating. Med Phys 2004, 31:3324-3329.
10. Pandit P., Qi Y., Story J., et al. Multi-shot PROPELLER for high-field MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010, 64:47-53.
11. Pandit P., Qi Y., King K.F., et al. Reduction of artifacts in T2 -weighted PROPELLER in high-field preclinical imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011, 65:538-543.
12. Pipe J.G. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999, 42:963-969.
13. Badea C., Fubara B., Hedlund L., et al. 4D micro-CT of the mouse heart. Mol Imaging 2005, 4:110-116.
14. Mukundan S., Ghaghada K.B., Badea C.T., et al. A liposomal nanoscale contrast agent for preclincal CT in mice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:300-307.
15. Hergan K., Doringer W., Langle M., et al. Effects of iodinated contrast agents in MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 1995, 21:11-17.
16. Howles G.P., Nouls J.C., Qi Y., et al. Rapid production of specialized animal handling devices using computer-aided design and solid freeform fabrication. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 30:466-471.
17. Lin M., Toncheva G., Nguyen G., et al. Application of MOSFET detectors in small animal digital subtraction angiography (DSA) dosimetry. Radiat Res 2008, 170:260-263.
18. Berns G.S., Howell S.M., Farley T.E. The accuracy of signal intensity measurements in magnetic resonance imaging as evaluated with the knee. Mag Reson Imaging 1992, 10:573-578.
19. Ford N.L., Thornton M.M., Holdsworth D.W. Fundamental image quality limits for microcomputed tomography in small animals. Med Phys 2003, 30:2869-2877.
20. Martiniova L., Kotys M.S., Thomasson D., et al. Noninvasive monitoring of a murine model of metastatic pheochromocytoma: a comparison of contrast-enhanced microCT and nonenhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 29:685-691.