Aortobiiliac bypass to the distal external iliac artery versus aortobifemoral bypass: A matched cohort study

American Surgeon

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 61-66

  York, John W ^a   Johnson, Brent L ^a   Cicchillo, Michael ^a   Taylor, Spence M ^a   Cull, David L ^a   Kalbaugh, Corey ^a  

^a GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL INJURY; ADULT; AORTOBIFEMORAL BYPASS; AORTOBIILIAC BYPASS; ARTERY BYPASS; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLAUDICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRAFT INFECTION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; ILEUS; ILIAC ARTERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL WOUND; TREATMENT INDICATION; VASCULAR PATENCY; ABDOMINAL AORTA; AGED; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMORAL ARTERY; FOLLOW UP; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR GRAFTING;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875073805     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Rutherford RB. Aortobifemoral bypass, the gold standard: technical considerations. Semin Vasc Surg 1994;7:11-6.
2. Brewster DC, Darling MD. Optimal methods of aortoiliac reconstruction. Surgery 1978;84:739-48.
3. Malone JM, Moore WS, Goldstone J. The natural history of bilateral aortofemoral bypass grafts for ischemia of the lower extremities. Arch Surg 1975;110:1300-6.
4. Nevelsteen A, Wouters L, Suy R. Aortofemoral Dacron reconstruction for aorto-iliac occlusive disease: a 25-year survey. Eur J Vasc Surg 1991;5:179-86.
5. Moore WS, Cafferata HT, Hall AD, et al. In defense of grafts across the inguinal ligament. Ann Surg 1968;168:207-14.
6. Szilagyi DE, Hageman JH, Smith RF, et al. A thirty-year survey of the reconstructive surgical treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:421-36.
7. Brewster DC, Cooke JC. Longevity of aortofemoral bypass grafts. In: Yao JST, Pearce WH, eds. Long-term Results in Vascular Surgery. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1993:149-61.
8. Crawford ES, Manning LG, Kelly TF. 'Redo' surgery after operations for aneurysm and occlusion of the abdominal aorta. Surgery 1977;81:41-52.
9. Crawford ES, Bomberger RA, Glaeser DH, et al. Aortoiliac occlusive disease: factors influencing survival and function following reconstructive operation over a twenty-five year period. Surgery 1981;90:1055-66.
10. Baird RJ, Feldman P, Miles JT, et al. Subsequent downstream repair after aorta-iliac and aorta-femoral bypass operations. Surgery 1977;82:785-93.
11. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010; 303:235-41.
12. Brewster DC. Current controversies in the management of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:365-79.