Agreeing on Validity Arguments

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 99-104

  Sireci, Stephen G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875060131     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: 17453984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12005     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Bennett, R. E. (2010). Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning (CBAL): A preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment. Measurement, 8(2-3), 70-91.
3. Downing, S. M. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Forte, E. (2012, January). A next generation of validity evaluation and technical documentation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Rocky Hill, CT.
5. GED Testing Service (2009). Technical manual: 2002 series GED tests. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
6. Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527-535.
7. Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
8. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-100). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.