Optimum oil production planning using infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm

Evolutionary Computation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 65-82

  Singh, Hemant Kumar ^a   Ray, Tapabrata ^a   Sarker, Ruhul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Evolutionary algorithms; Infeasibility; Integer linear programming; Multi objective; Oil well

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINED OPTIMI-ZATION PROBLEMS; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; INFEASIBILITY; INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI-OBJECTIVE FORMULATION; OIL PRODUCTION PLANNING; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS;

CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; GASES; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; OIL WELLS; PLANNING; PRODUCTION CONTROL; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; PROFITABILITY; WATER INJECTION;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

PETROLEUM;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PETROLEUM;

EID: 84875034488     PISSN: 10636560     EISSN: 15309304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/EVCO_a_00064     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ayatollahi, S., Narimani, M., and Moshfeghian, M. (2004). Intermittent gas lift in Aghajari oil field, a mathematical study. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 42(2-4):245-255.
2. Bandyopadhyay, S., Saha, S., Maulik, U., and Deb, K. (2008). A simulated annealing-based multiobjective optimization algorithm: AMOSA. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 12(3):269-283.
3. Buitrago, S., Rodriguez, E., and Espin, D. (1996). Global optimization techniques in gas allocation for continuous flow gas lift systems. In SPE Gas Technology Conference, Vol. SPE 35616 (pp. 375-383).
4. Camponogara, E., and Nakashima, P. H. (2006). Solving a gas-lift optimization problem by dynamic programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2):1220-1246.
5. Coello Coello, C. A. (1999). A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimization techniques. Knowledge and Information Systems: An International Journal, 1(3):269-308.
6. Deb, K., and Agrawal, S. (1995). Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, 9(2):115-148.
7. Deb, K., and Goyal, M. (1996). A combined genetic adaptive search (geneas) for engineering design. Computer Science and Informatics, 26(4):30-45.
8. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):182-197.
9. Dutta-Roy, K., and Kattapuram, J. (1997). A new approach to gas-lift allocation optimization. In SPE Western Regional Meeting, Vol. SPE 38333 (pp. 685-691).
10. Fang, W., and Lo, K. K. (1996). A generalized well-management scheme for reservoir simulation. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 11(2):116-120.
11. Hedar, A., and Fukushima, M. (2006). Derivative-free filter simulated annealing method for constrained continuous global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 35(4):291-308.
12. Kosmidis, V. D., Perkins, J. D., and Pistikopoulos, E. N. (2005). A mixed integer optimization formulation for the well scheduling problem on petroleum fields. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 29(7):1523-1541.
13. Koziel, S., and Michalewicz, Z. (1999). Evolutionary algorithms, homomorphous mappings, and constrained parameter optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 7(1):19-44.
14. Liu, H., and Li, X. (2009). The multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on determined weight and sub-regional search. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Compution (CEC), pp. 1928-1934.
15. Nishikiori, N., Render, R., Roy, D., and Schmidt, Z. (1989). An improved method for gas lift allocation optimization. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Vol. SPE 18711 (pp. 105-118).
16. Ray, T., and Sarker, R. (2007). Optimum oil production planning using an evolutionary approach. In K. Dahal, K. Tan, and P. Cowling (Eds.), Evolutionary scheduling, Vol. 49 (pp. 273-292). Studies in computational intelligence. Berlin: Springer.
17. Ray, T., Singh, H. K., Isaacs, A., and Smith, W. (2009). Infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization. In E. Mezura-Montes (Ed.), Constraint handling in evolutionary optimization, Vol. 198 (pp. 145-165). Studies in computational intelligence. Berlin: Springer.
18. Sarker, R., Liang, K.-H., and Newton, C. (2002). A new multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(1):12-23.
19. Singh, H. K., Isaacs, A., Ray, T., and Smith, W. (2008). Infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm (IDEA) for engineering design optimization. In Proceedings of the 21st Australiasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence AI-08, pp. 104-115.
20. Zhang, Q., and Li, H. (2007). MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(6):712-731.
21. Zhang, Q., and Suganthan, P. N. (2009). Final report on CEC '09 MOEA competition. Technical report, The School of CS and EE, University of Essex, UK; and School of EEE, Nangyang Technological University, Singapore.
22. Zitzler, E., and Thiele, L. (1998). Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms-A comparitive case study. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN-V (pp. 292-301). Berlin: Springer.