Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 11-38

  Rogers, Wendy ^a   MacKenzie, Catriona ^a   Dodds, Susan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875020551     PISSN: 19374585     EISSN: 19374577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/ijfab.5.2.11     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Agich, George J. 1990. Reassessing autonomy in long-term care. Hastings Center Report 20 (6): 12-7.
2. Anderson, Joel, and Axel Honneth. 2005. Autonomy, vulnerability, recognition, and justice. In Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, ed. John Christman and Joel Anderson, 127-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Australian Human Rights Commission. 1997. Bringing them home: Report of the national inquiry into the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
4. Australian Indigenous Doctors' Association (AIDA) and Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation, UNSW. 2010. Health impact assessment of the Northern Territory emergency response. Canberra: Australian Indigenous Doctors' Association.
5. Baume, Fran. 1998. The new public health: An Australian perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bayer, Ronald, and Amy L. Fairchild. 2004. Genesis of public health ethics. Bioethics 18 (6): 473-92.
7. Baylis, Françoise, Nuala Kenny, and Susan Sherwin. 2008. A relational account of public health ethics. Public Health Ethics 1 (3): 196-209.
8. Beauchamp, Dan E., and Bonnie Steinbock. 1999. New ethics for the public's health. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Bielby, Phil. 2008. Competence and vulnerability in biomedical research. New York: Springer.
10. Brock, Dan. 2002a. Health resource allocation for vulnerable populations. In Ethical Dimensions of Health Policy, ed. Marion Danis, Carolyn Clancy, and Larry R. Churchill, 283-309. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. - 2002b. Priority to the worse off in health-care resource allocation. In Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care, ed. Rosamond Rhodes, Margaret P. Battin, and Anita Silvers, 362-72. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Dodds, Susan. 2007. Depending on care: Recognition of vulnerability. Bioethics 21 (9): 500-510.
13. Dunn, Michael C., Isabel C. H. Clare, and Anthony J. Holland. 2008. To empower or to protect? Constructing the "vulnerable adult" in English law and public policy. Legal Studies 28 (2): 234-53.
14. Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and Other Legislation Amendment (Northern Territory National Emergency Response and Other Measures) Act. 2007. (Commonwealth of Australia)
15. Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1 (20): 1-23.
16. Flaskerud, Jacquelyn H., and Betty J. Winslow. 1998. Conceptualizing vulnerable populations' health-related research. Nursing Research 47 (2): 69-78. (Pubitemid 128456470)
17. Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Struggle over needs. In Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, ed. Nancy Fraser, 161-90. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Goodin, Robert. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Ho, Anita. 2008. The individualist model of autonomy and the challenge of disability. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3): 193-207.
20. Hoffmaster, Barry. 2006. What does vulnerability mean? Hastings Center Report 36 (2): 38-45.
21. Hurst, Samia A. 2008. Vulnerability in research and health care; Describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 22 (4):191-202.
22. Jennings, Bruce, Jeffrey Kahn, Anna Mastroianni, and Lisa S. Parker. 2003. Ethics and public health: Model curriculum. New York: Hastings Center.
23. Kipnis, Kenneth. 2003. Seven vulnerabilities in the pediatric research subject. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2): 107-20.
24. Kittay, Eva F. 1999. Love's labour: Essays on women, equality and dependency. London: Routledge.
25. Kittay, Eva F., Bruce Jennings, and Angela A. Wasunna. 2005. Dependency, difference and the global ethics of longterm care. The Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (4): 443-69. (Pubitemid 41807055)
26. Levine, Carol, Ruth Faden, Christine Grady, Dale Hammerschmidt, Lisa Eckenwiler, Jeremy Sugarman, and the Consortium to Examine Clinical Research Ethics. 2004. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3): 44-49.
27. Luna, Florencia. 2009. Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1): 121-39.
28. Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, Margaret O. Little, and Ruth Faden. 2008. The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2): 5-22.
29. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.
30. Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar, eds. 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Macklin, Ruth. 2003. Bioethics, vulnerability and protection. Bioethics 17: 472-86.
32. Meyers, Diana T. 1989. Self, society and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
33. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. 1979. Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. U.S. Government Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
34. Nickel, Philip J. 2006. Vulnerable populations in research: The case of the seriously ill. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27: 245-64.
35. Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) Review Board. 2008. Northern Territory emergency response: Report of the NTER review board. Canberra: Government of Australia
36. Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act. 2007. (Commonwealth of Australia)
37. Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. - 2011. Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. O'Neill, John. 2005. Need, humiliation and independence. In The Philosophy of Need, ed. Soran Reader, 73-97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Powers, Madison, and Ruth Faden. 2006. Social justice: The moral foundations of health and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Productivity Commission. 2011. Disability care and support. Report no. 54. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
42. Racial Discrimination Act. 1975. (Commonwealth of Australia) Reader, Soran. 2005. The philosophy of need. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. - 2006. Does a basic needs approach need capabilities? Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3): 337-50.
44. - 2007. Needs and moral necessity. London: Routledge.
45. Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl. 2002. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability - Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 5: 235-44.
46. Ricoeur, Paul. 2007. Autonomy and vulnerability. In Reflections on the Just, trans. Dave Pellauer, 72-90. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Rogers, Wendy A. 2006. Feminism and public health ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 351-54.
48. Rogers, Wendy, and Angela J. Ballantyne. 2008. Special populations: Vulnerability and protection. RECIIS: Electronic Journal of Communication, Information and Innovation in Health 2 (Supplement 1): S30-S40.
49. - 2009. Justice in health research: What is the role of evidence-based medicine? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (2): 188-202.
50. Schroeder, Doris, and Eugenijus Gefenas. 2009. Vulnerability: Too vague and too broad? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18: 113-21.
51. Sellman, Derek. 2005. Towards an understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability. Nursing Philosophy 6: 2-10.
52. Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. - 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Welfare Payment Reform) Act. 2007. (Commonwealth of Australia)
55. Spiers, Judith. 2000. New perspectives on vulnerability using emic and etic approaches. Journal of Advanced Nursing 31 (3): 715-21.
56. Thomas, James C., Michael Sage, Jack Dillenberg, and V. James Guillory. 2002. A code of ethics for public health. American Journal of Public Health 92 (7): 1057-59.
57. Turner, Bryan S. 2006. Vulnerability and human rights. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
58. Walker, Margaret Urban. 1998. Moral understandings: A feminist study of ethics. New York: Routledge.
59. Wiggins, David. 1991. Claims of need. In Needs, Values, Truth, 1-57. Oxford: Blackwell.
60. - 2005. An idea we cannot do without. In The Philosophy of Need, ed. Soran Reader, 25-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Wild, Rex, and Patricia Anderson. 2007. Ampe akelyernemane meke mekarle: "Little children are sacred." Report of the Northern Territory board of inquiry into the protection of Aboriginal children from sexual abuse. Darwin: Northern Territory Government. Wood
62. Allen W. 1995. Exploitation. Social Philosophy and Policy 12: 136-58.