Manifold-based feature point matching for multi-modal image registration

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hu, Liang ^a,b   Wang, Manning ^a,b   Song, Zhijian ^a,b  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b The Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging   (China)

Author keywords

Image registration; Manifold learning; Scale invariant feature transform

Indexed keywords

IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

ACCURATE REGISTRATION; BACKGROUND IMAGE; FEATURE POINTS MATCHING; IMAGES REGISTRATION; INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORMS; MANIFOLD LEARNING; MULTIMODAL IMAGE REGISTRATION; SCALE INVARIANT FEATURES; SCALE-INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORM; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84874984100     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1465     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, et al. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 29(1): 196-205.
2. Andronache A, Von Siebenthal M, SZ Kely G, et al. Non-rigid registration of multi-modal images using both mutual information and cross-correlation. J Med Image Anal 2008; 12(1): 3-15.
3. Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. A survey of medical image registration. J Med Image Anal 1998; 2(1): 1-36.
4. Hill DLG, Batchelor PG, Holden M, et al. Medical image registration. J Phys Med Biol 2001; 46(3): R1-R45.
5. Gholipour A, Kehtarnavaz N, Briggs R, et al. Brain functional localization: a survey of image registration techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007; 26(4): 427-451.
6. Besl PJ, MCkay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 1992; 14(2): 239-256.
7. Borgefors G. Hierarchical chamfer matching: a parametric edge matching algorithm. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 1988; 10(6): 849-865.
8. Lee JH, Won CH. Topology preserving relaxation labeling for nonrigid point matching. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 2011; 33(2): 427-432.
9. Myronenko A, Song X. Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 2010; 32(12): 2262-2275.
10. Lowe DG. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vision 2004; 60(2): 91-110.
11. Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 2005; 27(10): 1615-1630.
12. Wachinger C, Navab N. Manifold Learning for Multi-modal Image Registration. 21st British Machine Vision Conference. 2010.
13. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, et al. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16(2): 187-198.
14. Pluim JPW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22(8): 986-1004.
15. Chen J, Tian J. Real-time multi-modal rigid registration based on a novel symmetric-SIFT descriptor. Prog Nat Sci 2009; 19(5): 643-651.
16. Roche A, Malandain G, Pennec X, et al. The correlation ratio as a new similarity measure for multimodal image registration. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI'98), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1998; 1496(1): 1115-1124.
17. Pizarro D, Bartoli A. Shadow resistant direct image registration. Proceedings of the Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis 2007.
18. Belkin M, Niyogi P. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. J Neural Comput 2003; 15(6): 1373-1396.
19. Wachinger C, Mateus D, Keil A, et al. Manifold learning for patient position detection in MRI. 7th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2010; 1353-1356.
20. Tenenbaum JB, De Silva V, Langford JC. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. J Sci 2000; 290(5500): 2319-2323.
21. Roweis ST, Saul LK. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. J Sci 2000; 290(5500): 2323-2326.
22. Donoho DL, Grimes C. Hessian eigenmaps: locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(10): 5591-5596.
23. Weinberger KQ, Saul LK. Unsupervised learning of image manifolds by semidefinite programming. Int J Comput Vision 2006; 70(1): 77-90.
24. Coifman RR, Lafon S, Lee AB, et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: diffusion maps. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(21): 7426-74231.
25. Reicher T, MacWilliams A, Brugge B, et al. Results of a study on software architectures for augmented reality systems. Proceedings of Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003; 274-275.
26. Van Der Maaten L, Postma E, Van Den Herik J. Dimensionality reduction: a comparative review. J Machine Learning Res 2009; 10: 1-41.
27. Pawiro S, Markelj P, Pernuš F, et al. Validation for 2D/3D registration I: a new gold standard data set. J Med Phys 2011; 38(3): 1481.