Paraphilic diagnoses in DSM-5

Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 248-254

  Krueger, Richard B ^a   Kaplan, Meg S ^a  

^a New York State Psychiatric Institute ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; SEXUAL DEVIATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; PARAPHILIAS;

EID: 84874966512     PISSN: 03337308     EISSN: 26172402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Overview: The future manual. 2011 [cited May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/about/Pages/DSMVOverview.aspx.
2. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5: The future of psychiatric diagnosis. 2011 [cited May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx.
3. American Psychiatric Association. Frequently asked questions. 2011 [cited May 27th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.DSM-5.org.
4. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5/Home/Proposed Revisions/Paraphilias. 2011 [cited May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/Paraphilias.aspx.
5. Spitzer RL. APA and DSM-V: Empty promises. Psychiatric Times 2009; 26:1.
6. Frances A. Whither DSM-V? Br J Psychiatry 2009;195:391-392.
7. American Psychiatric Association. Sexual dysfunctions. 2011 [citedMay 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/Pages/Paraphilias.aspx.
8. American Psychiatric Association. U 05 Sexual sadism disorder. [cited May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=188.
9. Blanchard R. The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Arch Sex Behav 2010;39:304-316.
10. First MB. The inclusion of child pornography in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for pedophilia: Conceptual and practical problems. J Am Acad. Psychiatry Law 2011;39:250-254.
11. Wright S. Depathologizing consensual sexual sadism, sexual masochism, transvestic fetishism, and fetishism. Arch Sex Behav 2010;39:1229-1230.
12. Wakefield JC. DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: Tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility. Int J Law Psychiatry 2011;34:195-209.
13. Moser C. Problems with ascertainment. Arch Sex Behav 2010;39:1225-1227.
14. Fedoroff JP. Forensic and diagnostic concerns arising from the proposed DSM-5 criteria for sexual praphiic disorder. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2011;39:238-241.
15. O'Donohue W. A critique of the proposed DSM-V diagnosis of pedophilia. Arch Sex Behav 2010: 39:587-590.
16. O'Donohue W, Regev LG, Hagstrom A. Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sex Abuse 2000;12:95-105.
17. Kendler K, Kupfer D, Narrow W, Phillips K, Fawcett J. Guidelines for making changes to DSM-V Revised 10/21/2009. American Psychiatric Association, 2009 [cited May 28th, 2011]. Available from: DSM-5.org.
18. First MB. DSM-5 proposals for paraphilias: Suggestions for reducing false positives related to use of behavioral manifestations. Arch Sex Behav 2010;39:1239-1244.
19. Blanchard R, Klassen P, Dickey R, Kuban ME, Blak T. Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychol Assess 2001;13:118-126.
20. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Text Revision. DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 2000: pp. 1-943.
21. Helzer JE, Wittchen H-U, Krueger RF, Kraemer HC. Dimensional options for DSM-V: The way forward. In: Helzer JE, Kraemer HC, Krueger RF, Wittchen H-U, Sirovatka PJ, Regier DA, editors. Dimensional approaches in diagnostic classification. Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V. American Psychiatric Association; Arlington, VA, 2008: pp. 115-127.
22. Helzer JE, Kraemer HC, Krueger RF, Wittchen H-U, Sirovatka PJ, Regier DA. Dimensional approaches in diagnostic classification. Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. In: Helzer JE, Kraemer HC, Krueger RF, Wittchen H-U, Sirovatka PJ, Regier DA, editors. Dimensional Approaches in Diagnostic Classification. Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, VA, 2008: pp. 1-136.
23. Kraemer HC. DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2007;16:S8-S15.
24. Blanchard R, Lykins AD, Wherrett D, Kuban ME, Cantor JM, Blak T, et al. Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav 2009;38:335-350.
25. Blanchard R. Reply to letters regarding pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav 2009;38:331-334.
26. American Psychiatric Association. U 03 Pedohebephilic Disorder. 2011 [cited 2011 May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=186.
27. Green R. Sexual preference for 14-year-olds as a mental disorder: You can't be serious!! Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39:585-586.
28. Green R. Hebephilia is a mental disorder? Sexual Offender Treat 2010;5:1-7.
29. Frances A, First MB. Hebephilia is not a mental disorder in DSM-IV-TR and should not become one in DSM-5. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2011;39:78-85.
30. Barbaree HEM, W.L. Erectile responses among heterosexual child molesters, father-daughter incest offenders, and matched non-offenders: five distinct age preference profiles. Can J Behav Sci 1989;12:70-82.
31. Freund K, Costell R. The structure of erotic preference in the nondeviant male. Behav Res Ther 1970;8:15-20.
32. Quinsey VL, Steinman CM, Bergersen SG, Holmes TF. Penile circumference, skin conductance, and ranking responses of child molesters and "normals" to sexual and nonsexual visual stimuli. Behav Ther 1975;6:213-219.
33. Franklin K. The public policy implications of "hebephilia": A response to Blanchard et al. (2008). Arch Sex Behav 2009;38:319-320.
34. Blanchard R. Reply to letters regarding pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav 2009; 38; 331-334.
35. Seto MC, Cantor JM, Blanchard R. Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2006;115:610-615.
36. Seto MC. Child pornography use and internet solicitation in the diagnosis of pedophilia. Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39:591-593.
37. Krueger RB, Kaplan MS, First MB. Sexual and other Axis 1 diagnoses of 60 males arrested for crimes against children involving the internet. CNS Spectrums 2009;14:623-631.
38. Krueger RBK, Kaplan MS. Non-contact sexual offenses: Exhibitionism, voyeurism, possession of child pornography, and interacting with children over the internet. In: Hoberman HP, Phoenix A, editors. Sex Offenders: Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, & Management. New York: Springer, 2012. In press.
39. Fedoroff JP. Personal communication. July 1st, 2011.
40. Thornton D. Personal communication. Study under the guidance of Robin Wilson (Florida), David Thornton (Wisconsin) and David Thornton & Deirdre D'Orazio (California) August 1st, 2011.
41. Blanchard R. A brief history of field trials of the DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilias. Arch Sex Behav 2011; 40:1-2.
42. American Psychiatric Association. Paraphilic coercive disorder. [cited 2011 May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=416.
43. Fuller AK, Fuller AE, Blashfield RK. Paraphilic coercive disorder. J Sex Educ Ther 1990;16:164-171.
44. Zander TK. Inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2008;36:459-469.
45. Franklin K. Letter to the Editor. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2011;39:137.
46. Stern P. Paraphilic coercive disorder in the DSM: The right diagnosis for the right reasons. Arch Sex Behav 2010;39:1443-1447.
47. Yoon J, Knight RA. Sexual material perception in sexually coercive men: Disattending deficit and its covariates. Sex Abuse 2011;23:275-291.
48. Kafka MP. Hypersexual disorder: A proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav 2009; 39:377-400
49. American Psychiatric Association. Hypersexual disorder. [cited May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=415.
50. Zonana H. Sexual disorders: New and expanded proposals for the DSM-5: Do we need them? J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2011;39:245-249.
51. Halpern AL. The proposed diagnosis of hypersexual disorder for inclusion in DSM-5: Unnecessary and harmful. Arch Sex Behav 2011; 40:487-488.
52. Moser C. Hypersexual disorder: Just more muddled thinking. Arch Sex Behav 2011;40:227-229.
53. American Psychiatic Association. U 06 Transvestic disorder. [cited 2011 May 28th, 2011]. Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=189
54. The Associated Press. Sweden says transvestism is not a disease. The Associated Press Archive. 2008, November 19, 2008, Sect. 1.
55. Reiersol O, Skeid S. The ICD diagnoses of fetishism and sadomasochism. J Homosex 2006;50:243-262.
56. Gijs L. Carroll RA. the Should transvestic fetishism be classified in DSM-5? Recommendations from WPATH consensus process for revision of the diagnosis of transvestic fetishism. Int J Transgenderism 2010;12:189-197.
57. Kafka MP. The DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism. Arch Sex Behav 2009; 39:357-362
58. American Psychiatric Association. U 01 Fetishistic disorder. [cited May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=63.
59. Reiersol O, Skeid S. The ICD diagnoses of fetishism and sadomasochism. In: Kleinplatz PJ, Moser C, editors. Sadomasochism: Powerful pleasures. Binghamton, N.y.: Harrington Park Press, 2006: pp. 243-262.
60. American Psychiatric Association. U 04 Sexual masochism disorder. [cited May 28th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=187.
61. Hucker SJ. Hypoxyphilia. Arch Sex Behav 2011; 40:1323-1326.
62. Krueger RB. The DSM diagnostic criteria for sexual masochism. Arch Sex Behav 2010;39:346-356.
63. Money J. Lovemaps. Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology, paraphilia, and gender transposition in childhood, adolescence, and maturity. New York, N.y.: Irvington, 1986: pp. 1-331.
64. Shindel AW, Moser CA. Why are the paraphilias mental disorders? J Sex Med 2011; 8:2955-2956.
65. Zucker KJ. Introduction to the special section on pedophilia: Concepts and controversy. Arch Sex Behav 2002;31:465.
66. American Psychiatric Association. [cited June 15th, 2011]; Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx.