Imaging specificity of MR-optical imaging agents following the masking of surface charge by poly(ethylene glycol)

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 16, 2013, Pages 4118-4127

  Wu, Shou Cheng ^a   Lin, Kun Liang ^a   Wang, Tzu Pin ^b   Tzou, Shey Cherng ^a   Singh, Gyan ^a   Chen, Ming Hung ^a   Cheng, Tian Lu ^b   Chen, Chiao Yun ^c   Liu, Gin Chung ^c   Lee, Te Wei ^d   Hu, Shao Hwa ^e   Wang, Yun Ming ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

^e CHUNG SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

EGFR; Erbitux; MnMEIO; MRI; Nanocarrier

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EGFR; ERBITUX; FLOW-CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS; IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; MNMEIO; NANOCARRIERS; NON-SPECIFIC BINDING;

ANTIBODIES; ENZYME INHIBITION; GEOMETRICAL OPTICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL IMAGE STORAGE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; TUMORS;

MOTION PICTURE EXPERTS GROUP STANDARDS;

CETUXIMAB; CONTRAST MEDIUM; COPOLYMER; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; FLUORESCENT DYE; MACROGOL; MANGANESE DOPED IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; NANOCARRIER; NANOPARTICLE; SILANE AND AMINE FUNCTIONALIZED POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) NANOPARTICLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONJUGATE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOCYTOSIS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SURFACE CHARGE;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, NUDE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NANOPARTICLES; NEOPLASMS; OPTICAL IMAGING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RECEPTOR, EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; SILANES; STATIC ELECTRICITY; XENOGRAFT MODEL ANTITUMOR ASSAYS;

CITRUS MACROPHYLLA; MUS MUSCULUS;

EID: 84874961020     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.025     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jennings L.E., Long N.J. 'Two is better than one'-probes for dual-modality molecular imaging. Chem Commun 2009, 24:3511-3524.
2. She H., Chen Y., Chen X., Zhang K., Wang Z., Peng D.L. Structure, optical and magnetic properties of NiAu and AuNi nanoparticles synthesized via non-aqueous approaches. J Mater Chem 2012, 22:2757-2765.
3. Yang L., Peng X.H., Wang Y.A., Wang X., Cao Z., Ni C., et al. Receptor-targeted nanoparticles for in vivo imaging of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009, 15:4722-4732.
4. Lee C.M., Jang D., Kim J., Cheong S.J., Kim E.M., Jeong M.H., et al. Oleyl-chitosan nanoparticles based on a dual probe for optical/MR Imaging in vivo. Bioconjug Chem 2011, 22:186-192.
5. Foy S.P., Manthe R.L., Foy S.T., Dimitrijevic S., Krishnamurthy N., Labhasetwar V. Optical imaging and magnetic field targeting of magnetic nanoparticles in tumors. ACS Nano 2010, 4:5217-5224.
6. Liu F., Laurent S., Fattahi H., Vander Elst L., Müller R.N. Superparamagnetic nanosystems based on iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical imaging. Nanomed 2011, 6:519-528.
7. Hadjipanayis C.G., Machaidze R., Kaluzova M., Wang L., Schuette A.J., Chen H., et al. EGFRvIII antibody-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging-guided convection-enhanced delivery and targeted therapy of glioblastoma. Cancer Res 2010, 70:6303-6312.
8. Sun C., Du K., Fang C., Bhattarai N., Veiseh O., Kievit F., et al. PEG-mediated synthesis of highly dispersive multifunctional superparamagnetic nanoparticles: their physicochemical properties and function in vivo. ACS Nano 2010, 4:2402-2410.
9. Veiseh O., Sun C., Gunn J., Kohler N., Gabikian P., Lee D., et al. Optical and MRI multifunctional nanoprobe for targeting gliomas. Nano Lett 2005, 5:1003-1008.
10. Chen C.L., Zhang H., Ye Q., Hsieh W.Y., Hitchens T.K., Shen H.H., et al. A new nano-sized iron oxide particle with high sensitivity for cellular magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Imaging Biol 2011, 13:825-839.
11. Salvador-Morales C., Zhang L., Langer R., Farokhzad O.C. Immunocompatibility properties of lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles with heterogeneous surface functional groups. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2231-2240.
12. Chen H., Wang L., Yeh J., Wu X., Cao Z., Wang Y.A., et al. Reducing non-specific binding and uptake of nanoparticles and improving cell targeting with an antifouling PEO-b-PgammaMPS copolymer coating. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5397-5407.
13. Boutry S., Brunin S., Mahieu I., Laurent S., Vander Elst L., Müller R.N. Magnetic labeling of non-phagocytic adherent cells with iron oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive study. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2008, 3:223-232.
14. Cao Z., Yu Q., Xue H., Cheng G., Jiang S. Nanoparticles for drug delivery prepared from amphiphilic PLGA zwitterionic block copolymers with sharp contrast in polarity between two blocks. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 122:3859-3864.
15. Lin R.Y., Dayananda K., Chen T.J., Chen C.Y., Liu G.C., Lin K.L., et al. Targeted RGD-nanoparticles for high sensitive in vivo integrin receptor imaging. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2012, 7:7-18.
16. Cho E.C., Xie J., Wurm P.A., Xia Y. Understanding the role of surface charges in cellular adsorption versus internalization by selectively removing gold nanoparticles on the cell surface with a I2/KI etchant. Nano Lett 2009, 9:1080-1084.
17. Wang B., Zhang L., Bae S.C., Granick S. Nanoparticle-induced surface reconstruction of phospholipid membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008, 105:18171-18175.
18. + surfaces for magnetic manipulations of biomolecules and MRI contrast agents. Biomaterials 2005, 26:7183-7191.
19. Carpenter A.W., Slomberg D.L., Rao K.S., Schoenfisch M.H. Influence of scaffold size on bactericidal activity of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5:7235-7244.
20. Soonthornthum T., Arias-Pulido H., Joste N., Lomo L., Muller C., Rutledge T., et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor as a biomarker for cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 2011, 22:2166-2178.