Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses

Biological Invasions

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 837-846

  Dick, Jaimie T A ^a   Gallagher, Kevin ^a   Avlijas, Suncica ^b   Clarke, Hazel C ^a   Lewis, Susan E ^c   Leung, Sally ^a   Minchin, Dan ^d   Caffrey, Joe ^e   Alexander, Mhairi E ^a   Maguire, Cathy ^a   Harrod, Chris ^a,f   Reid, Neil ^a   Haddaway, Neal R ^g   Farnsworth, Keith D ^a   Penk, Marcin ^h   Ricciardi, Anthony ^b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c CARROLL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d KLAIPEDA UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^e INLAND FISHERIES IRELAND   (Ireland)

^f UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTOFAGASTA   (Chile)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^h TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Ecological impact; Functional response; Prediction; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BIVALVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOOD WEB; FORECASTING METHOD; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; INVASIVE SPECIES; MAGNITUDE; NATIVE SPECIES; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PREDICTION; RESOURCE DEPLETION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TAXONOMY;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); FARFANTEPENAEUS AZTECUS; HEMIMYSIS ANOMALA; MYSIS; MYSIS DILUVIANA; MYSIS RELICTA; MYSIS SALEMAAI;

EID: 84874948438     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0332-8     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Akre BG, Johnson DM (1979) Switching and sigmoid functional response curves by damselfly naiads with alternative prey available. J Anim Ecol 48: 703-720.
2. Alexander ME, Dick JTA, O'Connor N, Haddaway N, Farnsworth KD (2012) Functional responses of the intertidal amphipod Echinogammarus marinus: effects of prey supply, model selection and habitat complexity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (in press).
3. Andersen MC, Adams H, Hope B, Powell M (2004) Risk analysis for invasive species: general framework and research needs. Risk Anal 24: 893-900.
4. Bolker BM (2010) Emdbook: ecological models and data in R. R PackageVersion 121.
5. Bollache L, Dick JTA, Farnsworth KD, Montgomery WI (2008) Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biol Lett 4: 166-169.
6. Borcherding J, Murawski S, Arndt H (2006) Population ecology, vertical migration and feeding of the Ponto-Caspian invader Hemimysis anomala in a gravel-pit lake connected to the River Rhine. Freshwat Biol 51: 2376-2387.
7. Byers JE, Reichard S, Randall JM, Parker IM, Smith CS, Lonsdale WM et al (2002) Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conserv Biol 16: 630-640.
8. Caldow RW, Furness RW (2001) Does Holling's disc equation explain the functional response of a kleptoparasite? J Anim Ecol 70: 650-662.
9. Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species. Divers Distrib 10: 135-141.
10. Colbourne JK, Crease TJ, Weider LJ, Hebert PDN, Dufresne F, Hobæk A (1998) Phylogenetics and evolution of a circumarctic species complex (Cladocera: Daphnia pulex). Biol J Linn Soc 65: 347-365.
11. Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (1995) Plant invaders, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
12. Davis MA (2009) Invasion biology, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Dick JTA, Armstrong M, Clarke HC, Farnsworth KD, Hatcher MJ, Ennis M, Kelly A, Dunn AM (2010) Parasitism may enhance rather than reduce the predatory impact of an invader. Biol Lett 6: 636-638.
14. Farnsworth KD, Focardi S, Beecham JA (2002) Grassland-herbivore interactions: how do grazers coexist? Am Nat 159: 24-39.
15. Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low resource systems. Nature 446: 1079-1081.
16. Haddaway NR, Wilcox RH, Heptonstall REA, Griffiths HM, Mortimer RJG, Christmas M, Dunn AM (2012) Predatory functional response and prey choice identify predation differences between native/invasive and parasitised/unparasitised crayfish. PLoS ONE 7(2): e32229.
17. Hayes KR, Barry SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol Inv 10: 483-506.
18. Holdich D, Gallagher S, Rippon L, Harding P, Stubbington R (2006) The invasive Ponto-Caspian mysid, Hemimysis anomala, reaches the UK. Aq Inv 1: 4-6.
19. Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91: 385-398.
20. Hoof RC, Bollens SM (2004) Functional response and potential predatory impact of Tortanus dextrilobatus, a carnivorous copepod recently introduced to the San Francisco Estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 277: 167-179.
21. Jeschke JM, Hohberg K (2008) Predicting and testing functional responses: an example from a tardigrade-nematode system. Bas App Ecol 9: 145-151.
22. Jeschke JM, Kopp M, Tollrian R (2002) Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecol Monog 72: 95-112.
23. Johnson BM, Martinez PJ, Hawkins JA, Bestgen KR (2008) Ranking predatory threats by nonnative fishes in the Yampa River, Colorado via bioenergetics modeling. N Am J Fish Man 28: 1941-1953.
24. Jones DB, Giles KL, Berberet RC, Royer TA, Elliot NC, Payton ME (2003) Functional responses of an introduced parasitoid and an indigenous parasitoid on greenbug at four temperatures. Environ Entomol 32: 425-432.
25. Jones C, Pech R, Forrester G, King CM, Murphy EC (2011) Functional responses of an invasive top predator Mustela erminea to invasive meso-predators Rattus rattus and Mus musculus, in New Zealand forests. Wildl Res 38: 131-140.
26. Juliano SA (2001) Non-linear curve fitting: Predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 178-196.
27. Keller RP, Kocev D, Dzeroski S (2011) Trait-based risk assessment for invasive species: high performance across diverse taxonomic groups, geographic ranges and machine learning/statistical tools. Divers Distrib 17: 451-461.
28. Kestrup AM, Dick JTA, Ricciardi A (2011) Interactions between invasive and native crustaceans: differential functional responses of intraguild predators towards juvenile hetero-specifics. Biol Inv 13: 731-737.
29. Ketelaars HAM, Lambreqts-van de Clundert FE, Carpentier CJ, Waqenvoort AJ, Hooqenboezem W (1999) Ecological effects of the mass occurrence of the Ponto-Caspian invader, Hemimysis anomala G. O. Sars, 1907 (Crustacea: Mysidacea), in a freshwater storage reservoir in the Netherlands, with notes on its autecology and new records. Hydrobiologia 394: 233-248.
30. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. TREE 16: 199-204.
31. Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis M, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc Roy Soc B 269: 2407-2413.
32. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2007) Invasion ecology, 1st edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
33. McIntyre S, Martin TG, Heard KM, Kinloch J (2005) Plant traits predict impact of invading species: an analysis of herbaceous vegetation in the subtropics. Austral J Bot 53: 757-770.
34. Middlemas SJ, Barton TR, Armstrong JD, Thompson PM (2006) Functional and aggregative responses of harbour seals to changes in salmonid abundance. Proc Roy Soc B 273: 193-198.
35. Minchin D, Holmes JMC (2008) The Ponto-Caspian mysid, Hemimysis anomala G. O. Sars 1907 (Crustacea), arrives in Ireland. Aq Inv 3: 257-259.
36. Morrison ME, Hay ME (2011) Feeding and growth of native, invasive and non-invasive alien apple snails (Ampullariidae) in the United States: invasives eat more and grow more. Biol Inv 13: 945-955.
37. Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9: 1-131.
38. National Research Council (2002) Predicting invasions of nonindigenous plants and plant pests. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
39. Nentwig W, Kuhnel E, Bacher S (2009) A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe. Conserv Biol 24: 302-311.
40. Nero RW, Sprules WG (1986) Zooplankton species abundance and biomass in relation to occurrence of Mysis relicta (Malacostraca: Mysidacea). Can J Fish Aq Sci 43: 420-434.
41. Nesler TP, Bergersen EP (1991) Mysids in fisheries: hard lessons from headlong introductions. American Fisheries Society Symposium no. 9, Bethesda, Maryland.
42. Pysek P, Krivanek M, Jarosik V (2009) Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90: 2734-2744.
43. Ricciardi A (2003) Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshwat Biol 48: 972-981.
44. Ricciardi A, Avlijas S, Marty J (2012) Forecasting the ecological impacts of the Hemimysis anomala invasion in North America: lessons from other freshwater mysid introductions. J Gr Lakes Res 38(Suppl 2): 7-13.
45. Rogers DJ (1972) Random search and insect population models. J Anim Ecol 41: 369-383.
46. Schenk D, Bacher S (2002) Functional response of a generalist insect predator to one of its prey species in the field. J Anim Ecol 71: 524-531.
47. Smout S, Asseburg C, Mattiopoulos J, Fernandez C, Redpath S, Thirgood S, Harwood J (2010) The functional response of a generalist predator. PLoS ONE 5(5): e10761. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0010761.
48. Strayer DL, Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Findlay S, Pace ML (1999) Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves: a case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River. BioScience 49: 19-27.
49. Tecco PA, Diaz S, Cabido M, Urcelay C (2010) Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land-use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them? J Ecol 98: 17-27.
50. Trexler JC, McCullough CE, Travis J (1988) How can the functional response best be determined? Oecologia 76: 206-214.
51. Twardochleb LA, Novak M, Moore JW (2012) Using the functional response of a consumer to predict biotic resistance to invasive prey. Ecol Appl 22: 1162-1171.
52. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M (2010) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol Lett 13: 947-958.
53. Whall JD, Lasenby DC (2009) Differences in the trophic role of Mysis diluviana in two intermontane lakes. Aq Biol 5: 281-292.
54. Williams F, Eschen R, Harris A, Djeddour D, Pratt C, Shaw RH, Varia S, Lamontagne-Godwin J, Thomas SE, Murphy ST (2010) The economic cost of invasive non-native species to Great Britain. CABI Proj No VM10066, pp 1-99.