Damage potential of near-fault records: Sliding displacement against conventional "Intensity Measures"

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 455-480

  Garini, Evangelia ^a   Gazetas, George ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Arias Intensity; Damage potential; Directivity; Fling; Housner Intensity; Intensity measures; Near fault motions; Sliding displacement; Tohoku earthquake

Indexed keywords

ARIAS INTENSITIES; DAMAGE POTENTIAL; DIRECTIVITY; FLING; HOUSNER INTENSITY; INTENSITY MEASURE; NEAR-FAULT MOTIONS; SLIDING DISPLACEMENTS; TOHOKU EARTHQUAKES;

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; GEOPHYSICS;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

ASYMMETRY; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GROUND MOTION; SLIDING; SLIP; TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE 2011;

ANAS;

EID: 84874945683     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9397-0     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abrahamson NA (2000) Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In: Proceedings, 6th international conference on seismic zonation, palm springs, California, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
2. Abrahamson NA (2001) Incorporating effects of near fault tectonic deformation into design ground motions. University at Buffalo MCEER: Friedman F. V. Professional Program, webcast: http://mceer: buffalo. edu/outreach/pr/Abrahamson. asp.
3. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. In: Proceedings of the 12th world earthquake conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand.
4. Ambraseys NN, Menu JM (1988) Earthquake-induced ground displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16: 985-1006.
5. Ambraseys NN, Sarma SK (1967) The response of earth dams to strong earthquakes. Géotechnique 17: 181-213.
6. Ambraseys NN, Srbulov M (1994) Attenuation of earthquake-induced ground displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 23: 467-487.
7. Araya R, Saragoni G (1984) Earthquake accelerogram destructiveness potential factor. In: Proceedings of 8th world conference on earthquake engineering, pp 835-842.
8. Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity, In: Hansen RJ (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 438-483.
9. Bertero VV (1976) Establishment of design earthquakes: evaluation of present methods. In: Proceedings, international symposium of earthquake structural engineering, vol 1, University of Missouri-Rolla, St. Louis, pp 551-580.
10. Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA (1978) Aseismic design implications of near-fault san fernando earthquake records. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6: 31-42.
11. Bray JD, Rathje EM (1998) Earthquake-induced displacements of solid-waste landfills. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124: 242-253.
12. Cai Z, Bathurst RJ (1996) Deterministic sliding block methods for estimating seismic displacements of earth structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng Elsevier 15: 255-268.
13. Changhai Z, Shuang L, Xie LL, Yamin S (2007) Study on inelastic displacement ratio spectra for near-fault pulse-type ground motions. Earthq Eng Eng Vib Springer 6(4): 351-356.
14. Constantinou MC, Gazetas G (1987) Probabilistic seismic sliding deformations of earth dams and slopes. In: Proceedings of the specialty conference on probabilistic mechanics and structural reliability, ASCE, pp 318-321.
15. Constantinou MC, Gazetas G, Tadjbakhsh I (1984) Stochastic seismic sliding of rigid mass against asymmetric coulomb friction. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 12: 777-793.
16. Crespellani T, Madiai C, Vannucchi G (1998) Earthquake destructiveness potential factor and slope stability. Geotechnique 48: 411-420.
17. Franklin A, Chang FK (1977) Earthquake resistance of earth and rock-fill dams, report 5: permanent displacements of earth embankments by Newmark sliding block analysis. Miscellaneous paper S-71-17, soils and pavements laboratory, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg.
18. Garini E, Gazetas G (2012) Destructiveness of earthquake ground motions: "Intensity Measures" versus sliding displacement. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Taormina, Italy, Paper No. 7. 07, pp 886-899.
19. Garini E, Gazetas G, Anastasopoulos I (2011) Asymmetric 'Newmark' sliding caused by motions containing severe 'directivity' and 'fling' pulses. Géotechnique 61(9): 733-756.
20. Gazetas G, Garini E, Anastasopoulos I, Georgarakos T (2009) Effects of near-fault ground shaking on sliding systems. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(12): 1906-1921.
21. Gazetas G, Uddin N (1994) Permanent deformation on pre-existing sliding surfaces in dams. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120(11): 2041-2061.
22. Gazetas G, Debchaudhury A, Gasparini DA (1981) Random vibration analysis for the seismic response of earth dams. Géotechnique 31(2): 261-277.
23. Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq Spectra 11(4): 569-605.
24. Harp EL, Jibson RW (1995) Seismic instrumentation of landslides: building a better model of dynamic landslide behaviour. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85: 93-99.
25. Hisada Y, Bielak J (2003) A theoretical method for computing near-fault ground motions in layered half-spaces considering static offset due to surface faulting, with a physical interpretation of fling step and rupture directivity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3): 1154-1168.
26. Housner GW (1952) Spectrum intensities of strong motion earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the symposium on earthquake and blast effects on structures, EERI, Oakland California, pp 20-36.
27. Iwan WD, Huang CT, Guyader AC (2000) Important features of the response of inelastic structures to near-fault ground motion. In: Proceedings of the 12th world earthquake conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand, Paper No. 1740.
28. Jibson RW (2007) Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol 91: 209-218.
29. Jibson RW (1994) Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark's sliding block analysis. Transportation Research Record, No. 1411, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 9-17.
30. Kramer SL, Lindwall NW (2002) Dimensionality and directionality effects of Newmark stability analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130: 303-315.
31. Kramer SL, Smith M (1997) Modified Newmark model for seismic displacements of compliant slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Engin ASCE 123: 635-644.
32. Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4: 415-443.
33. Lin JS, Whitman RV (1983) Decoupling approximation to the evaluation of earthquake-induced plastic slip in earth dams. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 11: 667-678.
34. Ling H (2001) Recent applications of sliding block theory to geotechnical design. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng ASCE 21(3): 189-197.
35. Makdisi FI, Seed HB (1978) Simplified procedure For estimating dam and embankment earthquake induced deformations. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 104: 849-867.
36. Makris N, Roussos YS (2000) Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions. Géotechnique 50(3): 243-262.
37. Makris N, Chang S (2000) Effect of viscous, visco-plastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29: 85-107.
38. Mavroeidis PG, Dong G, Papageorgiou SA (2004) Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-Of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33: 1023-1049.
39. Nuttli OW (1979) The relation of sustained maximum ground acceleration and velocity to earthquake intensity and magnitude. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Miscellaneous Paper S-76-1, Report 16, p 74.
40. Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Géotechnique 15(2): 139-160.
41. Pavlou EA, Constantinou MC (2004) Response of elastic and inelastic structures with damping systems to near-field and soft-soil ground motions. Eng Struct 26: 1217-1230.
42. Pitilakis K (2004) Site effects. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Springer, New York, pp 139-197.
43. Richards R, Elms DG (1979) Seismic behaviour of gravity retaining walls. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 105: 449-464.
44. Richards R, Elms DG, Budhu M (1993) Seismic bearing capacity and settlement of foundations. J Geotech Eng ASCE 119: 662-674.
45. Sarma SK (1975) Seismic stability of earth dams and embankments. Géotechnique 2(4): 743-761.
46. Sarma SK (1981) Seismic displacement analysis of earth dams. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 107: 1735-1739.
47. Sarma SK, Yang KS (1987) An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95. Earthq Eng & Struct Dyn 15(1): 119-132.
48. Sarma SK, Kourkoulis R (2004) Investigation into the prediction of sliding block displacements in seismic analysis of earth dams. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, paper no 1957.
49. Sasani M, Bertero VV (2000) Importance of severe pulse-type ground motions in performance-based engineering: historical and critical review. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand, Paper No 1302.
50. Sawada T, Chen WF, Nomachi SG (1993) Assessment of seismic displacements of slopes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 12: 357-362.
51. Seed HB, Martin GR (1966) The seismic coefficient in earth dam design. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 92: 25-58.
52. Seyedi M, Gehl P, Davenne L, Ghavamian S, Mezher N, De Douglas, J., Martin F, Modaressi H (2007) Numerical modelling of the influence of earthquake strong-motion characteristics on the damage level of a reinforced concrete structure. 7ème Colloque National AFPS, Ecole Centrale Paris, ID: A095.
53. Shen J, Tsai MH, Chang KC, Lee GC (2004) Performance of a Seismically Isolated Bridge under Near-Fault Earthquake Ground Motions. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 130: 861-868.
54. Singh JP (1985) Earthquake ground motions: implications for designing structures and reconciling structural damage. Earthq Spectra 1: 239-270.
55. Somerville P (2000) Seismic hazard evaluation, 12th WCEE 2000. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 33: 325-346, 484-491.
56. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68: 199-222.
57. Stamatopoulos CA, Velgaki EG, Modaressi A, Lopez-Caballero F (2006) Seismic displacement of gravity walls by a two-body model. Bull Earthq Eng 4: 295-318.
58. Stamatopoulos CA (1996) Sliding system predicting large permanent co-seismic movements of slopes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25: 1075-1093.
59. Von Thun JL, Rochim LH, Scott GA, Wilson JA (1988) Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams. Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics II-recent advances in ground-motion evaluation. Geotechnical Special Publication 20, ASCE, pp 463-481.
60. Whitman RV, Liao S (1984) Seismic design of gravity retaining walls. In: Proceedings of the 8th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 3, San Francisco, pp 533-540.
61. Wartman J, Bray JD, Seed RB (2003) Inclined plane studies of the Newmark sliding block procedure. J Geotech Geo-environ Eng ASCE 129(8): 673-684.
62. Xu LJ, Rondriguez-Marek A, Xie LL (2006) Design spectra including effect of rupture directivity in near-fault region. Earthq Eng Eng Vib Springer 5(2): 159-170.
63. Yegian MK, Marciano EA, Ghahraman VG (1991) Earthquake induced permanent deformations: a probabilistic approach. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117: 35-50.
64. Yegian MK, Harb JN, Kadakal U (1998) Dynamic response analysis procedure for landfills and geosynthetic liners. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(10): 1027-1033.