메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 480-485

Preferences for the normative basis of health care priority setting: Some evidence from two countries

Author keywords

equity; health maximisation; priority preferences; rule of rescue

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; NORWAY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERSONAL NEEDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 84874944857     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: 10991050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.2805     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (7)

References (8)
  • 1
    • 85047690988 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion
    • Anderson CJ,. 2003. The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion, Psychological Bulletin 129: 139-166.
    • (2003) Psychological Bulletin , vol.129 , pp. 139-166
    • Anderson, C.J.1
  • 3
    • 79954618043 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments
    • Lancsar E, Wildman J, Donaldson C, Ryan M, Baker R,. 2011. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. Journal of Health Economics 30 (2): 466-478.
    • (2011) Journal of Health Economics , vol.30 , Issue.2 , pp. 466-478
    • Lancsar, E.1    Wildman, J.2    Donaldson, C.3    Ryan, M.4    Baker, R.5
  • 4
    • 0038184187 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Threats to the estimation of benefit: Are preference elicitation methods accurate?
    • Lloyd AJ,. 2003. Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate? Health Economics 12: 393-402.
    • (2003) Health Economics , vol.12 , pp. 393-402
    • Lloyd, A.J.1
  • 6
    • 0035057054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: A systematic review of techniques
    • Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al,. 2001. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technology Assessment 5 (5): 1-186.
    • (2001) Health Technology Assessment , vol.5 , Issue.5 , pp. 1-186
    • Ryan, M.1    Scott, D.A.2    Reeves, C.3
  • 7
    • 0041924826 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care: A critical assessment
    • Smith R,. 2003. Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care: a critical assessment. Health Economics 12: 609-628.
    • (2003) Health Economics , vol.12 , pp. 609-628
    • Smith, R.1
  • 8
    • 0023754221 scopus 로고
    • Priority setting in public and private health care: A guide through the ideological jungle
    • Williams A,. 1988. Priority setting in public and private health care: a guide through the ideological jungle. Journal of Health Economics 7: 173-183.
    • (1988) Journal of Health Economics , vol.7 , pp. 173-183
    • Williams, A.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.