Sources of information influencing decision-making in orthopaedic surgery - An international online survey of 1147 orthopaedic surgeons

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Schulz, Arndt P ^a   Jönsson, Anders ^b   Kasch, Richard ^c   Prithee, Jettoo ^d   Bhandari, Mohit ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^d Northern Deanery   (United Kingdom)

^e MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision making process; Evidence based medicine; Internet based; Online evaluation; Opinion; Orthopaedics; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PEER REVIEW; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84874942388     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-96     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Synthes Audited Full Year 2011 Financial Statements http://www.synthes. com/sites/intl/InvestorsMedia/FinancialReports/Pages/2009-10.aspx
2. Orthopaedic Product Development: Steps to Success. Lissy DA, OrthoTec. vol. Volume 2 Fairfield, NJ: UBM Canon 2011
3. Overcoming the funding challenge: the cost of randomized controlled trials in the next decade. Shore BJ, Nasreddine AY, Kocher MS, J Bone Joint Surg 2012 94 Suppl 1(E) 101 106 10.2106/JBJS.L.00193 22810458
4. The impact of direct-to-consumer advertising in orthopaedics. Bozic KJ, Smith AR, Hariri S, Adeoye S, Gourville J, Maloney WJ, Parsley B, Rubash HE, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 458 202 219 17353799
5. Orthopaedic surgeons and the medical device industry: the threat to scientific integrity and the public trust. Gelberman RH, Samson D, Mirza SK, Callaghan JJ, Pellegrini VD Jr, J Bone Joint Surg 2010 92 3 765 10.2106/JBJS.I.01164 20194337
6. Executive summary: value-based purchasing and technology assessment in orthopaedics. Ranawat A, Nunley R, Bozic K, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009 467 10 2556 2560 10.1007/s11999-009-0908-5 19495897
7. The effect of patients sex on physicians recommendations for total knee arthroplasty. Borkhoff CM, Hawker GA, Kreder HJ, Glazier RH, Mahomed NN, Wright JG, CMAJ 2008 178 6 681 687 18332383 (Pubitemid 351441469)
8. Orthopaedic surgeons prefer to participate in expertise-based randomized trials. Bednarska E, Bryant D, Devereaux PJ, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008 466 7 1734 1744 10.1007/s11999-008-0273-9 18446421
9. Resident work-hour rules: a survey of residents and program directors opinions and attitudes. Immerman I, Kubiak EN, Zuckerman JD, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2007 36 12 172 E179 discussion E179
10. Perception of Gardens classification for femoral neck fractures: an international survey of 298 orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Keel M, Hanson BP, Schemitsch E, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005 125 7 503 505 10.1007/s00402-005-0022-4 16075274
11. Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine. Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, McLain R, Shaffer W, Myers M, Glaser J, Hart RA, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 30 19 2208 2213 10.1097/01.brs.0000181057.60012.08 (Pubitemid 41429202)
12. Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, Swiontkowski MF, Berry DJ, Haidukewych G, Schemitsch EH, Hanson BP, Koval K, Dirschl D, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 87 9 2122 2130 10.2106/JBJS.E.00535 16140828 (Pubitemid 41279145)
13. Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Marx RG, Jones EC, Angel M, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, Arthroscopy 2003 19 7 762 770 10.1016/S0749-8063(03)00398-0 12966385 (Pubitemid 37108234)
14. Secondary prevention following fractured neck of femur: a survey of orthopaedic surgeons practice. Sheehan J, Mohamed F, Reilly M, Perry IJ, Ir Med J 2000 93 4 105 107 11037567
15. A randomized trial of opinion leader endorsement in a survey of orthopaedic surgeons: effect on primary response rates. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Shankardass K, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Int J Epidemiol 2003 32 4 634 636 10.1093/ije/dyg112 12913042 (Pubitemid 37039021)
16. The need for education in evidence-based orthopedics: an international survey of AO course participants. Hanson BP, Bhandari M, Audige L, Helfet D, Acta Orthop Scand 2004 75 3 328 332 10.1080/00016470410001277 15260426
17. Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond. Sprague S, Quigley L, Bhandari M, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009 91 Supplement-3 27 34 19411497
18. Effects of various methodologic strategies. Grava-Gubins I, Scott S, Can Fam Physician 2008 54 10 1424 1430 18854472
19. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL, Educ Psychol Meas 2000 60 6 821 836 10.1177/00131640021970934
20. A review of how to conduct a surgical survey using a questionnaire. Hing CB, Smith TO, Hooper L, Song F, Donell ST, Knee 2011 18 4 209 213 10.1016/j.knee.2010.10.003 21115354
21. A resident survey study of orthopedic fellowship specialty decision making and views on arthroplasty as a career. Hariri S, York SC, OConnor MI, Parsley BS, McCarthy JC, J Arthroplasty 2011 26 6 961 968 e961 10.1016/j.arth.2010.09.012 21130602
22. Complications in spinal surgery: comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery. Ratliff JK, Lebude B, Albert T, Anene-Maidoh T, Anderson G, Dagostino P, Maltenfort M, Hilibrand A, Sharan A, Vaccaro AR, J Neurosurg Spine 2009 10 6 578 584 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE0935 19558291
23. Opinion survey regarding pediatric orthopaedic trauma call and emergency trauma management. Scherl SA, Rathjen KE, Gerardi J, Kiefer G, Georgopoulos G, Murphy-Zane MS, Blasier RD, Schoenecker PL, Epps H, J Pediatr Orthop 2008 28 4 393 396 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318173f76c 18520272
24. The current practice of orthopaedic oncology in North America. White J, Toy P, Gibbs P, Enneking W, Scarborough M, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010 468 11 2840 2853 10.1007/s11999-010-1413-6 20532714
25. Blood conservation and pain control in scoliosis corrective surgery: an online survey of UK practice. Bird S, McGill N, Paediatr Anaesth 2011 21 1 50 53 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03443.x 21155926
26. American Orthopaedic Association symposium: Evaluating the flood of orthopaedic media and marketing information. Purvis JM, Alexander AH, Einhorn TA, Griffin LY, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 87 6 1392 1398 10.2106/JBJS.E.00191 15930553 (Pubitemid 40756646)
27. Regional orthopaedic courses-rationale and practice. Harvey JR, Thomas NP, Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004 86 6 451 454 10.1308/147870804759 15527587 (Pubitemid 39462278)
28. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N, J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 2 107 112 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004. 09.002 15680740 (Pubitemid 40174916)
29. The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M, BMC Public Health 2012 12 1 751 10.1186/1471-2458-12-751 22958371
30. The NHS White Paper: licence for radical cultural reform of the NHS? Halligan A, J R Soc Med 2011 104 4 146 148 10.1258/jrsm.2011.11k008 21502212
31. Bogg D, The NHS white paper and GP consortia offer opportunities for positive change Brighton, England: Mental health today 2010 21
32. White paper. Conflicting messages from the hint at growing resistance. McLellan A, Health Serv J 2010 120 6224 3 21344708
33. White paper whiteout. Aitken M, J R Soc Med 2010 103 11 467 468 10.1258/jrsm.2010.100275 21037337
34. Limited access to the international medical literature in Russia. Jargin SV, Wien Med Wochenschr 2012 162 11-12 272 275 22688620
35. A new example of scientific bias of the English language: the American guide to stopping smoking treatment. de Granda-Orive JI, Solano-Reina S, Jimenez-Ruiz C, Arch Bronconeumol 2010 46 2 104 105 19926382
36. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM, J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011 39 2 91 92 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001 21145753
37. Challenging the reported disadvantages of e-questionnaires and addressing methodological issues of online data collection. Hunter L, Nurse Res 2012 20 1 11 20 23061269
38. Web-based data collection yielded an additional response bias-but had no direct effect on outcome scales. Mayr A, Gefeller O, Prokosch HU, Pirkl A, Frohlich A, de Zwaan M, J Clin Epidemiol 2012 65 9 970 977 10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2012.03.005 22742911
39. Questionnaire surveys of dentists on radiology. Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K, Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012 41 4 267 275 10.1259/dmfr/58627082 22517994
40. Comparability of Internet and telephone data in a survey on the respiratory health of children. Plante C, Jacques L, Chevalier S, Fournier M, Can Respir J 2012 19 1 13 18 22332126
41. Perceptions of conflict of interest disclosures among peer reviewers. Lippert S, Callaham ML, Lo B, PLoS One 2011 6 11 26900 10.1371/journal.pone. 0026900 22073216
42. Data quality assurance: an analysis of patient non-response. Derby DC, Haan A, Wood K, Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2011 24 3 198 210 10.1108/09526861111116642 21938966