Breast cancer screening update

American Family Physician

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 274-278

  Tirona, Maria Tria ^a  

^a Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SELF EXAMINATION; CANCER MORTALITY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAMMOGRAPHY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCINTIMAMMOGRAPHY; TEACHING; THERMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84874923761     PISSN: 0002838X     EISSN: 15320650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, et al. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):212-236.
2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics [published correction appears in CA Cancer J Clin. 2 0 11; 6 1 (2): 1 3 4]. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61 (2):69-90.
3. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17): 1784-1792.
4. Tho ma s D B, Gao DL, Ray R M, e t al. Randomized trial of breast self examination in Shanghai: fnal results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(19):1445-1457.
5. Semiglazov VF, Moiseyenko VM, Bavli JL, et al. The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad). Eur J Epidemiol. 1992;8(4):498-502.
6. Baxter N; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast selfexamination to screen for breast cancer? CMAJ. 2001;164(13):1837-1846.
7. McCready T, Littlewood D, Jenkinson J. Breast self-examination and breast awareness: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14 (5):570-578.
8. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis, version 1.2011. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf [registration required]. Accessed July 14, 2012.
9. American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 122: breast cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 pt 1):372-382.
10. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(1):27-41.
11. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years [published correction appears in CMAJ. 1993;14 8 (5):718]. CMAJ. 1992;147(10):1477-1488.
12. Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(18):1490-1499.
13. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA. 1999;282 (13):1270-1280.
14. Chiarelli AM, Majpruz V, Brown P, et al. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(18):1236-1243.
15. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(10):727-737, W237-W242.
16. Kerlikowske K. Effcacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute beneft. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):79-86.
17. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials [published correction appears in Lancet. 2002;360(9334):724]. Lancet. 2002; 359(9310):909-919.
18. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer. http:// www.ahrq.gov/clinic/USpstf/uspsbrca.htm. Accessed August 14, 2011.
19. Hellquist BN, Duffy SW, Abdsaleh S, et al. Effectiveness of populationbased service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort. Cancer. 2011; 11 7 (4): 714-722.
20. American Academy of Family Physicians. Breast cancer. http://www.aafp. org/online/en/home/clinical/exam/breastcancer.html. Accessed August 28, 2011.
21. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Screening for breast cancer. http://www.canadiantaskforce.ca/recommendations/2011_01_eng.html. Accessed July 18, 2012.
22. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging and intervention guidelines. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Standards-Guidelines/PracticeGuidelines-by-Modality/Breast-Imaging. Accessed June 29, 2012.
23. Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, et al. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefts and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(1):10-20.
24. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus flm mammography for breast-cancer screening [published corrrection appears in N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1840]. N Engl J Med. 2005;353 (17):1773-1783.
25. Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD001877.
26. Welch HG. Screening mammography-a long run for a short slide? N Engl J Med. 2010;363 (13):1276-1278.
27. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer [published correction appears in JAMA. 2010;303(15):1482]. JAMA. 2008;299 (18):2151-2163.
28. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Recht A, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(4):586-597.
29. Tillman GF, Orel SG, Schnall MD, et al. Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(16):3413-3423.
30. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(5):427-437.
31. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) [published correction appears in Lancet. 2005;365(9473):1848]. Lancet. 2005;365(9473):1769-1778.
32. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103(9):1898-1905.
33. Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology. 2007;244(2):381-388.
34. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(9):671-679.
35. Hede K. Breast MRI scans need standards, experts say. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99 (14):1066-1067.
36. Brenner RJ, Parisky Y. Alternative breast-imaging approaches. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(5):907-923.
37. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer risk assessment tool. http:// www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/Default.aspx. Accessed September 1, 2011.