I'd have to vote against you: Issue campaigning via twitter

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 259-262

  Roback, Andrew ^a   Hemphill, Libby ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Congress; Legislation; PIPA; SOPA; Twitter

Indexed keywords

CONGRESS; HASHTAGS; PIPA; SOPA; TWITTER;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84874922461     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2441955.2442016     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Chi, F. and Yang, N. Twitter adoption in Congress. Review of Network Economics 10, 1 (2011).
2. Cohen, J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 1 (1960), 37-46.
3. Domingos, P. and Pazzani, M. On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss. Machine Learning 29, 2-3 (1997), 103-130.
4. Glassman, M.E., Straus, J.B., and Shogan, C.J. Social Networking and Constituent Communication: Member Use of Twitter During a Two-Week Period in the 111th Congress. Washington, D.C., 2009.
5. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J.M., and Rogers, A. Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 8 (2010), 1612-1621.
6. Green, A. Twitter database server. 2011. http://140dev.com/free-twitter- api-source-code-library/twitter-database-server/.
7. Gulati, G.J. and Williams, C.B. Closing the gap, raising the bar: Candidate web site communication in the 2006 campaigns for congress. Social Science Computer Review 25, 4 (2007), 443-465.
8. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., and Witten, I.H. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations 11, 1 (2009).
9. Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J., and Shapiro, M.A. What's Congress Doing on Twitter? CSCW'13, (2013).
10. Larsson, A.O. and Moe, H. Studying political micro blogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society 14, 2 (2011).
11. Mascaro, C.M., Black, A., and Goggins, S. Tweet Recall : Examining Real-time Civic Discourse on Twitter. GROUP'12, (2012).
12. McCallum, A. and Nigam, K. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. AAAI-98 workshop on learning for text ... 752, (1998), 41-48.
13. Munson, S.A. and Resnick, P. The prevalence of political discourse in non-political blogs. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, (2011).
14. Otterbacher, J., Hemphill, L., and Shapiro, M.A. Tweeting vertically? Elected officials' interactions with citizens on Twitter. CeDEM (Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government) Asia 2012, (2012).
15. Parmelee, J.H. and Bichard, S.L. Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship Between Political Leaders and the Public (Google eBook). Lexington Books, 2011.
16. Rainie, L., Aaron Smith, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry Brady, and Sidney Verba. Social Media and Political Engagement. 2012.
17. Shogan, C.J. Blackberries, Tweets, and YouTube: Technology and the Future of Communicating with Congress. PS: Political Science & Politics 43, 2 (2010), 231-233.