Uncertainty quantification in CO2 sequestration using surrogate models from polynomial chaos expansion

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 52, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 3121-3132

  Zhang, Yan ^a,b   Sahinidis, Nikolaos V ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION (PCE); POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS; UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS;

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUNCTIONS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; ITERATIVE METHODS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84874831254     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie300856p     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pacala, S.; Socolow, R. Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies Science 2004, 305, 968-972
2. Metz, B.; Davidson, O.; de Coninck, H.; Loos, M.; Meyer, L., Eds. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; Cambridge University Press: New York, 2005.
3. 2 plume during and after injection in deep saline aquifer systems Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 3429-3436
4. LeNeveu, D. M. CQUESTRA-A risk and performance assessment code for geological sequestration of carbon dioxide Energy Conversion Manage. 2008, 49, 32-46
5. 2 plume evolution during injection Transport Porous Media 2005, 58, 339-360
6. Schlumberger. http://www.slb.com/services/software/reseng/compositional. aspx (Accessed June 12, 2012).
7. Pruess, K. The TOUGH codes-A family of simulation tools for multiphase flow and transport processes in permeable media Vadose Zone J. 2004, 3, 738-746
8. Class, H. A benchmark study on problems related to storage in geologic formations Comput. Geosci. 2009, 13, 409-434
9. Webster, M.; Tatang, M. A.; McRae Application of the probabilistic collocation method for an uncertainty analysis of a simple ocean model; MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, 1996.
10. Isukapalli, S. S.; Roy, A.; Georgopoulos, P. G. Stochastic response surface methods (SRSMs) for uncertainty propagation: Application to environmental and biological systems Risk Anal. 1998, 18, 351-363
11. Ghiocel, D. M.; Ghanem, R. G. Stochastic finite element analysis of seismic soil structure interaction J. Eng. Mech. 2002, 128, 66-77
12. Xiu, D.; Karniadakis, G. E. Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos J. Comput. Phys. 2003, 187, 137-167
13. Li, H.; Zhang, D. Probabilistic collocation method for flow in porous media: Comparisons with other stochastic methods Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43, 44-56
14. Eldred, E. S.; Burkardt, J. Comparison of non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty quantification. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, January 5-8, 2009; AIAA paper 2009-0976.
15. Blatman, G.; Sudret, B. An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis Probabil. Eng. Mech. 2010, 25, 183-197
16. Oladyshkin, S.; Class, H.; Helmig, R.; Nowak, W. An integrative approach to robust design and probabilistic risk assessment for storage in geological formations Comput. Geosci. 2011, 15, 565-577
17. Villadsen, J.; Michelsen, M. L. Solution of differential equation models by polynomial approximation; Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1978.
18. Oladyshkin, S.; Class, H.; Helmig, R.; Nowak, W. A concept for data-driven uncertainty quantification and its application to carbon dioxide storage in geological formations Adv. Water Resourc. 2011, 34, 1508-1518
19. Kopp, A.; Binning, P.; Johannsen, K.; Helmig, R.; Class, H. A contribution to risk analysis for leakage through abandoned wells in geological storage Adv. Water Resourc. 2010, 33, 867-879
20. Wiener, N. The homogeneous chaos Am. J. Math. 1938, 60, 897-936
21. Askey, R.; Wilson, J. Some basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials that generalize Jacobi polynomials; American Mathematical Society: Providence, 1985.
22. Gautschi, W. Algorithm 726: ORTHPOL-A package of routines for generating orthogonal polynomials and Gauss-type quadrature rules ACM Trans. Math. Software 1994, 20, 21-62
23. Kiureghian, A. D.; Liu, P. Structural reliability under incomplete probability information J. Eng. Mech. 1986, 112, 85-114
24. Hosder, S.; Walters, R. W.; Balch, M. Efficient sampling for non-intrusive polynomial chaos applications with multiple uncertain input variables. 9th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, 2007
25. Weisberg, S. Applied linear regression, 3 rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New Jersey, 2005.
26. Sahinidis, N. V. Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 971-983
27. Kumar, D. Optimization of well settings to maximize residually trapped in geologic carbon sequestration. M.Sc. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, MA, 2007.
28. 2; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, 2005.
29. National Petroleum Council Public Database, http://www.netl.doe.gov/ technologies/oil-gas/software/database.html (Accessed June 13, 2012).
30. Sahinidis, N. V. BARON: A general purpose global optimization software package J. Global Optim. 1996, 8, 201-205
31. Tawarmalani, M.; Sahinidis, N. V. A polyhedral branch-and-cut approach to global optimization Math. Programming 2005, 103, 225-249
32. Dvoretzky, A.; Kiefer, J.; Wolfowitz, J. Asymptotic minimax character of the sample distribution function and of the classical multinomial estimator Ann. Math. Stat. 1958, 27, 642-669