Factors influencing the response rate in social question & answering behavior

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1263-1273

  Liu, Zhe ^a   Jansen, Bernard J ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Information seeking; Social network; Social Q A; Social search; Weibo

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; EXTRINSIC FACTORS; INFORMATION SEEKING; SOCIAL INFORMATION; SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; SOCIAL NETWORKS; SOCIAL SEARCH; WEIBO;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INFORMATION USE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SURVEYS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84874828507     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441918     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Twitter.numbers. http://blog.twitter.com/2011/03/numbers.html.
2. Tsang, J. -A., Gratitude and prosocial behaviour: An experimental test of gratitude. Cognition & Emotion (2006), 20, 138-148.
3. Yang, J., & Wei, X. Seeking and offering expertise across categories: A sustainable mechanism works for baidu knows. Proceeding of ICWSM (2009).
4. Slinker, B. K., & Glantz, S. A. Multiple regression for physiological data analysis: The problem of multicollinearity. American Journal of Physiology- Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (1985), 249(1), R1-R12.
5. Sysomos. Replies and Retweets on Twitter. http://sysomos.com/ insidetwitter/engagement/.
6. Dent, K., & Paul, S. Through the twitter glass: Detecting questions in micro-text. In Workshop on Analyzing Microtext at the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011).
7. Efron, M., & Winget, M. Questions are content: A taxonomy of questions in a microblogging environment. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2010), 47(1), 1-10.
8. Evans, B. M., & Chi, E. H. Towards a model of understanding social search. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2008), pp. 485-494. ACM.
9. Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., & Panovich, K. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: A survey study of status message q&a behavior. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (2010), pp. 1739-1748. ACM.
10. Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., & Panovich, K. A comparison of information seeking using search engines and social networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2010).
11. Paul, S. A., Hong, L., & Chi, E. H. Is twitter a good place for asking questions? a characterization study. In Proceedings of ICWSM'11 (2011).
12. Broder, A. A taxonomy of web search. In ACM Sigir forum (2012), 36(2), pp. 3-10. ACM.
13. Teevan, J., Morris, M. R., & Panovich, K. Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked via Social Network Status Messages. In Proceedings of ICWSM'11(2011).
14. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. S. Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (2008), pp. 665-674. ACM.
15. Harper, F. M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., & Konstan, J. A. Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (2008), pp. 865-874. ACM.
16. Kleinberg, J. M. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM) (1999), 46(5), 604-632.
17. Guo, J., Xu, S., Bao, S., & Yu, Y. Tapping on the potential of q&a community by recommending answer providers. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management (2008), pp. 921-930. ACM.
18. Raban, D., & Harper, F. Motivations for answering questions online. New Media and Innovative Technologies (2008).
19. Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management (2008), 45(7), 458-465.
20. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American society for information science and technology (2009), 60(11), 2169-2188.
21. Bentwood, J. Distributed Influence: Quantifying the Impact of Social Media. Hentet den (2008), 15.
22. Lin, M. J. J., Hung, S. W., & Chen, C. J. Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior (2009), 25(4), 929-939.
23. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. P. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceeding of 4th international aaai conference on weblogs and social media (2010), 14(1), p8.
24. Rossi, L., & Magnani, M. Conversation Practices and Network Structure in Twitter. In Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012).
25. Kriplean, T., Toomim, M., Morgan, J., Borning, A., & Ko, A. Is this what you meant?: promoting listening on the web with reflect. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012), pp. 1559-1568. ACM.
26. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. Want to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network. In Proceeding of IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (2010), pp. 177-184. IEEE.
27. Huang, J., Thornton, K. M., & Efthimiadis, E. N..Conversational tagging in twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (2010), pp. 173-178. ACM.
28. Beitzel, S. M., Jensen, E. C., Chowdhury, A., Frieder, O., & Grossman, D. Temporal analysis of a very large topically categorized web query log. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2007), 58(2), 166-178.
29. PCOline, Sina Weibo Statistics http://pcedu.pconline.com.cn/softnews/ yejie/1205/2782402.html.
30. Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology (1973), 1360-1380.
31. Sibona, C., & Walczak, S. Unfriending on Facebook: Friend request and online/offline behavior analysis. In Proceeding of 44th Hawaii International Conference (2011), pp. 1-10. IEEE.
32. Kwak, H., Chun, H., & Moon, S. Fragile online relationship: A first look at unfollow dynamics in twitter. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems (2011), pp. 1091- 1100. ACM.
33. Reynolds, W. N., Weber, M. S., Farber, R. M., Corley, C., Cowell, A. J., & Gregory, M. Social media and social reality. In Proceeding of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (2010), pp. 221-226. IEEE.
34. Gelter, H. Friluftsliv as slow and peak experiences in the transmodern society. In Proceedings from Ibsen Jubliee Friluftsliv Conference (2009). North Trøndelag University College.
35. Oulasvirta, A., Lehtonen, E., Kurvinen, E., & Raento, M. Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and ubiquitous computing (2010), 14(3), 237-249.
36. Vega, E., Parthasarathy, R., & Torres, J. Where are my tweeps?: Twitter Usage at Conferences. Paper, Personal Information Management class, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2010).
37. Yang, J., & Counts, S. Predicting the speed, scale, and range of information diffusion in twitter. In Proceeding of ICWSM (201).
38. Comarela, G., Crovella, M., Almeida, V., & Benevenuto, F. Understanding factors that affect response rates in twitter. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM conference on Hypertext and social media (2012) pp. 123-132. ACM.
39. de Souza, C., de Magalhães, J., de Costa, E., & Fechine, J. Predicting potential responders in twitter: A query routing algorithm. Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA (2012), pp714-729.
40. Lumbreras, A., and Gavalda, R. Applying trust metrics based on user interactions to recommendation in social networks. In Social Knowledge Discovery and Utilization Workshop (2012).
41. Lo, S. K. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(5), 595-597.
42. Walther, J. B., & D'Addario, K. P. The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computermediated communication. Social Science Computer Review (2001), 19(3), 324-347.
43. Kalman, Y. M., & Gergle, D., CMC Cues Enrich Lean Online Communication: The Case of Letter and Punctuation Mark Repetitions, (2010).
44. Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior Helping When It Costs You. Psychological Science, 17(4), 319-325.
45. Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1). (2008).
46. Demirbas, M., Bayir, M. A., Akcora, C. G., Yilmaz, Y. S., & Ferhatosmanoglu, H. Crowd-sourced sensing and collaboration using twitter. In Proceeding of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (2010), pp. 1-9. IEEE.
47. Wakamiya, S., Lee, R., & Sumiya, K. Crowd-based urban characterization: extracting crowd behavioral patterns in urban areas from twitter. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks (2011), p10. ACM.