Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Young, Carmen ^a   von Dadelszen, Peter ^b   Alfirevic, Zarko ^c  

^a Lois Hole Hospital for Women   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SAFETY; SAMPLING; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VAGINA BLEEDING; WEIGHT; CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CATHETERIZATION; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84874815991     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000114.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Barkai G, Rabinovici, Chaki R, Shalev J, Katznelson MBM, Mashiach S, et al.Transcervical chorionic villi sampling: a comparison between the silver cannula and the portex catheter. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 1989;27:70-3.
2. Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Maschiach S, Chaki R, Goldman B. Transcervical CVS. A comparison between the Portex canula and the silver needle. Proceedings of 11th European Congress of Perinatal Medicine; 1988 April 10-13; Rome, Italy. 1988:143.
3. Battagliarin G, Lanna M, Coviello D, Tassis B, Quarenghi A, Nicolini U. A randomized study to assess two different techniques of aspiration while performing transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;33(2):169-72.
4. Buyukkurt S, Seydaoglu G, Demir C, Ozgunen FT, Evruke C, Guzel AB, et al.Evaluation of the feasibility of a new method for performing chorion villus sampling. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 2010;37(3):190-2.
5. Chalkiadakis G, Menton M, Wiest E, Schrage R. Catheter guided chorionic villus sampling technique. A prospective randomised study [Sondergesteurte Choriozottenbiopsietechnik - eine prospektive randomisierte Studie]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1993;254(1-4):1243-4.
6. MacKenzie WE, Holmes DS, Webb T, Whitehouse C, Newton JR. A randomized study of three cannulas for transcervical chorionic villus sampling. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1986;154:34-9.
7. Pons JC, Fernandez H, Eydoux P, Diallo A, Doumerc S, Frydman R, et al.Chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Randomized study of efficacy of two transcervical biopsy methods: aspiration cannulas and small forceps. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1989;32:187-94.
8. von Dadelszen P, Sermer M, Hillier J, Allen L, Fernandes B, Johnson J, et al.Randomised-controlled trial (RCT) of instruments for transcervical chorionic villus sampling (CVS). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;182(1 Pt 2):S187.
9. von Dadelszen P, Sermer M, Hillier J, Allen L, Fernandes B, Johnson J, et al.A randomised controlled trial of biopsy forceps and cannula aspiration for transcervical chorionic villus sampling. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005;112:559-66.
10. Cochrane L, Ainscough M, Alfirevic Z. The influence of needle and syringe size on chorionic villus sampling of term placentae: a randomised trial. Prenatal Diagnosis 2003;23:1049-51.
11. Alfirevic Z. Early amniocentesis versus transabdominal chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000077]
12. Buyukkurt S, Evruke C, Demir C, Ozgunen FT, Kadayifci O. A new device to facilitate the chorion villus sampling. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2009;37:425.
13. CEMAT Group. Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis. The Canadian Early and Mid-trimester Amniocentesis Trial (CEMAT) Group. Lancet 1998;351(9098):242-7.
14. Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.1 [updated June 2000]. In: Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 4.1 for Windows. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2000.
15. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
16. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 4.1 for Windows. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2000.
17. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
18. Smidt-Jensen S, Permin M, Philip J, Lundsteen C, Zachary JM, Fowler SE, et al.Randomised comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 1992;340:1237-44.
19. Alfirevic Z, von Dadelszen P. Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000114]