Comparative bibliometric study of the scientific production in Maghreb countries (Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia) in 1996-2009 using Scopus

Journal of Materials and Environmental Science

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 70-77

  Hammouti, B ^a  

^a FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Bibliometric; Citation; H index; Maghreb; Scientometric analysis; Scopus

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874804287     PISSN: 20282508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aksnes, Dag W., Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (2006) 169.
2. Douglas, M.L., Atran, S. (Eds.), 1999. Folk Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Garfield, E., Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 359.
3. Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. A proposal for a dynamic h-type index, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (2008) 1853.
4. Peng, M.W., Zhou, J.Q., Most cited articles and authors in global strategy research, Journal of International Management, 12 (2006) 490.
5. Katz, J.S., Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation, Science and Public Policy, 27 (2000) 23.
6. Yangge Tian, Cheng Wen, Song Hong, Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (2008) 65
7. Zhang, L., Wang, M-H., Hu, J., Ho, Y-S., A review of published wetland research, 1991-2008: Ecological engineering and ecosystem restoration, Ecological Engineering, 36 (2010) 973.
8. Jiang Li, Mark Sanderson, Peter Willett, Michael Norris, Charles Oppenheim, Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (2010) 554
9. Price, D.D.S., A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (1976) 292.
10. Lancaster, F.W. (1982) Publication patterns in Brazil. Science and Culture, 34, 627-634.
11. Meyer, V.R., The h Index - Help or Hype? Chimia, 63 (2009) 66.
12. Hirsch, J.E., An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output, PNAS, 102 (2005) 16569.
13. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields, Journal of Informetrics, 3 (2009) 273.
14. Alexander, W.A. Kellineri, Luiza, Ponciano. C.M.O., H-index in the Brazilian Academy of Sciences - comments and concerns, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 80 (2008) 771.
15. Glanzel, W., On the h-index, A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact, Scientometrics, 67 (2006) 315.
16. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D., Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work, Scientometrics, 65 (2005) 391.
17. Harzing, A.W.K. & Wal, R. van der, Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8 (2008) 62.
18. Marek Kosmulski, Hirsch-type index of international recognition, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (2010) 351
19. Courtault, J.-M., Hayek, N., Rimbaux, E., Zhu, T., Research in economics and management in France: A bibliometric study using the h-index, Journal of Socio-Economics, 39 (2010) 329.
20. Jie Hu, Yuwei Ma, Liang Zhang, Fuxing Gan, Yuh-Shan Ho, A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on lead in drinking water field from 1991 to 2007, Science of The Total Environment, 408 (2010) 1738
21. Jacobs, D. A bibliometric study of the publication patterns of scientists in South Africa 1992-96, with particular reference to status and funding. Information Research, 6 (2001) Available at: http://InformationR.net/6-2/paper104.html
22. Bouabid, H., Martin, B.R., Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: investigation of the validity of the h-index, Scientometrics, 78 (2009) 203.
23. Glänzel, W., On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67 (2006) 315.
24. van Raan A.F.J., Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups, Scientometrics 67 (2006) 491.
25. van Raan, A.F.J., Challenges in the ranking of universities. In: J. Sadlak and N.C. Liu (eds.). The World-Class University and Ranking: Aiming Beyond Status. Bucharest: UNESCO, (2007).
26. L. Bornmann, W. Marx, H. Schier, E. Rahm, A. Thor, H-D. Daniel, Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry-Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts, Journal of Informetrics, 3 (2009) 27.
27. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2119rank.html
28. Costas, R., Bordons, M., The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level, Journal of Informetrics, 1 (2007) 193.
29. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Consistent bibliometric rankings of authors and of journals, Journal of Informetrics 4 (2010) 365.
30. L. Bornmann, L., Mutza, R., Daniela H-D., The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (2010) 407.