The e-research on media and communications: Attitudes, tools and practices in Latin America researchers

Comunicar

Volumn 20, Issue 40, 2013, Pages 111-118

  Arcila Calderón, Carlos ^a   Piñuel Raigada, José Luis ^b   Calderín Cruz, Mabel ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DEL NORTE   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA ANDRÉS BELLO   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Communication; E Research; E Science; ICTs; Research; Science 2.0; Scientific collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874789875     PISSN: 11343478     EISSN: 19883293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3916/C40-2013-03-01     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ARCILA, C. (2011). La difusión digital de la investigación y las resistencias del mundo científico. In E. SAID (Ed.), Migración, desarrollo humano, internacionalización y digitalización. Retos del siglo XXI. (pp. 325-334). Barranquilla: UniNorte.
2. ARROYAVE, M., VELÁSQUEZ, A., et AL. (2011). Laboratorios remotos: diversos escenarios de trabajo. Disertaciones, Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación Social, 4, 2, 83-94.
3. ATKINS, D.E., DROEGEMEIR, K.K., et AL. (2003). Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Washington, DC: National Science Foun dation.
4. BERNIUS, S. (2010). The Impact of Open Access on the Management of Scientific Knowledge. Online Information Review, 34, 4, 583-603. (DOI: 10.1108/14684521011072990).
5. BORGMAN, C. (2007). Scholarship in the Digital Age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
6. BRICEÑO, Y., ARCILA, C., SAID, E. (2012). Colaboración y comunicación científica en la comunidad latinoamericana de físicos de altas energías. E-Colabora, 2, 4, 131-144.
7. CODINA, L. (2009). Ciencia 2.0: Redes sociales y aplicaciones en línea para académicos. Hipertext.net, 7.
8. CUADROS, A., MARTÍNEZ, A., TORRES, F. (2009). Determinantes de éxito en la participación de los grupos de investigación latinoamericanos en programas de cooperación científica internacional. In terciencia, 33, 11, 821-828.
9. CUEL, R., PONTE, D., ROSSI, A. (2009). Towards an Open/Web 2.0 Scientific Publishing Industry? Preliminary Findings and Open Issues. Informe Técnico de la University de Trento. (http://wiki.li-quidpub.org/mediawiki/upload/b/b3/CuelPonteRossi09.pdf) (05/10/2012).
10. DE FILIPPO, D., MORILLO, F., FERNÁNDEZ, M.T. (2008). Indicadores de colaboración científica del CSIC con Latinoamérica en bases de datos internacionales. Revista Española de Documen tación Científica, 31, 1, 66-84.
11. DUTTON, W.H., MEYER, E.T. (2008). e-Social Science as an Experience Technology: Distance From, and Attitudes Toward, e-Research. 4th International Conference on e-Social Science. Man hester (UK), 18-06-2008. (www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference/programme/thurs/1bMeyerb.pdf) (01/10/2011).
12. DUTTON, W., JEFFREYS, P. (Eds.) (2010). World Wide Re search. Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities. Cambridge, Massa chu setts: MIT Press.
13. GENTIL-BECCOT, A., MELE, S. & AL. (2009). Information Resources in High-Energy Physics: Surveying the Present Landscape and Charting the Future Course. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1, 150-160.
14. HEY, T., TANSLEY, S., TOLLE, K. (Eds.) (2009). The Fourth Para digm. Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond Was hington: Microsoft Research.
15. JANKOWSKI, N., CALDAS, A. (2004). e-Science: Principles, Projects and Possibilities for Communication and Internet Studies. Etmaal van Communicatiewetenschap Day of Communication Science. Holland: Universidad de Twente.
16. JENSEN, K.B., JANKOWSKI, N.W. (1993). Metodologías cualitativas de investigación en comunicación de masas. Barcelona: Bosch.
17. LIAO, C. (2010). How to Improve Research Quality? Examining the Impacts of Collaboration Intensity and Member Diversity in Collaboration Networks. Scientometrics, 86, 747-761.
18. NENTWICH, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
19. NEYLON, C., WU, S. (2009). Open Science: Tools, Approaches, and Implications. XIV Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Hawaii (USA), 09-01-2009. (http://psb.stanford.edu/psb-online/pro-ceedings/psb09/workshop-opensci.pdf) (05/10/2012).
20. PERROTT, R., HARMER, T., LEVIS, R. (2008). e-Science Infra structure for Digital Media Broadcasting. Computer, November, 67-72.
21. PONTE, D., SIMON, J. (2011). Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination. Serials Review, 37, 3, 149-156.
22. PROCTER, R., WILLIAMS, R. et AL.(2010). Adoption and Use of Web 2.0 in Scholarly Communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical, 368, 4.029-4.056.
23. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
24. STEWART, J. (2007). Local Experts in the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies, Information. Communication & Society, 10, 4, 547-569.
25. WALDROP, M. (2008). Science 2.0. Is Open Access Science the Future? Is Posting Raw Results Online, for all to See, a Great Tool or a Great Risk? Scientific American Magazine, 21 de abril. (www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=products.viewissuepreview&articleid_char=3e5a5fd7-3048-8a5e-106a58838caf9bf7) (01-11-2009).