Enhanced processing of 1-km spatial resolution fAPAR time series for sugarcane yield forecasting and monitoring

Remote Sensing

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1091-1116

  Duveiller, Grégory ^a   López Lozano, Raúl ^a   Baruth, Bettina ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

FAPAR; Regional scale; S o Paulo; SPOT VEGETATION; Sugarcane; Thermal time; Yield

Indexed keywords

FAPAR; REGIONAL SCALE; SPOT-VEGETATION; THERMAL TIME; YIELD;

IMAGE RESOLUTION; SUGAR CANE; TIME SERIES;

FORECASTING;

EID: 84874777876     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs5031091     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Atzberger, C. Advances in remote sensing of agriculture: Context description, existing operational monitoring systems and major information needs. Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 949-981.
2. Rembold, F.; Atzberger, C.; Rojas, O.; Savin, I. Using low resolution satellite imagery for yield prediction and yield anomaly detection. Remote Sens. 2013, under review.
3. Galvão, L.S.; Formaggio, A.R.; Tisot, D.A. Discrimination of sugarcane varieties in Southeastern Brazil with EO-1 Hyperion data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 94, 523-534.
4. Fortes, C.; Demattê, J.A.M. Discrimination of sugarcane varieties using Landsat 7 ETM+ spectral data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27, 1395-1412.
5. Rudorff, B.F.T.; De Aguiar, D.A.; Da Silva, W.F.; Sugawara, L.M.; Adami, M.; Moreira, M.A. Studies on the rapid expansion of sugarcane for ethanol production in São Paulo State (Brazil) using Landsat data. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1057-1076.
6. Romani, L.A.S.; Goncalves, R.R.V.; Amaral, B.F.; Chino, D.Y.T.; Zullo, J.; Traina, C.; Sousa, E.P.M.; Traina, A.J.M. Clustering Analysis Applied to NDVI/NOAA Multitemporal Images to Improve the Monitoring Process of Sugarcane Crops. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-temporal Remote Sensing Images (Multi-Temp), Trento, Italy, 12-14 July 2011; pp. 33-36.
7. Xavier, A.C.; Rudorff, B.F.T.; Shimabukuro, Y.E.; Berka, L.M.S.; Moreira, M.A. Multi-temporal analysis of MODIS data to classify sugarcane crop. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27, 755-768.
8. de Aguiar, D.A.; Rudorff, B.F.T.; Adami, M.; Shimabukuro, Y.E. Imagens de sensoriamento remoto no monitoramento da colheita da cana-de-açúcar. Engenharia Agrícola 2009, 29, 440-451.
9. Mobasheri, M.R.; Chahardoli, M.; Farajzadeh, M. Introducing PASAVI and PANDVI methods for sugarcane physiological date estimation, using ASTER images. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 2010, 12, 309-320.
10. Gonçalves, R.R.V.; Zullo, J.; Romani, L.A.S.; Nascimento, C.R.; Traina, A.J.M. Analysis of NDVI time series using cross-correlation and forecasting methods for monitoring sugarcane fields in Brazil. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2012, 33, 4653-4672.
11. Almeida, T.I.R.; De Souza Filho, C.R.; Rossetto, R. ASTER and Landsat ETM+ images applied to sugarcane yield forecast. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27, 4057-4069.
12. Picoli, M.C.A.; Rudorff, B.F.T.; Rizzi, R.; Giarolla, A. Índice de vegetação do sensor MODIS na estimativa da produtividade agrícola da cana-de-açúcar. Bragantia 2009, 68, 789-795.
13. Lofton, J.; Tubana, B.S.; Kanke, Y.; Teboh, J.; Viator, H.; Dalen, M. Estimating sugarcane yield potential using an in-season determination of normalized difference vegetative index. Sensors 2012, 12, 7529-7547.
14. Bégué, A.; Todoroff, P.; Pater, J. Multi-time scale analysis of sugarcane within-field variability: improved crop diagnosis using satellite time series? Precision Agr. 2008, 9, 161-171.
15. Fernandes, J.L.; Rocha, J.V.; Lamparelli, R.A.C. Sugarcane yield estimates using time series analysis of spot vegetation images. Sci. Agr. 2011, 68, 139-146.
16. Cheavegatti-Gianotto, A.; De Abreu, H.M.C.; Arruda, P.; Bespalhok Filho, J.C.; Burnquist, W.L.; Creste, S.; Di Ciero, L.; Ferro, J.A.; De Oliveira Figueira, A.V.; De Sousa Filgueiras, T.; et al. Sugarcane (Saccharum X officinarum): A reference study for the regulation of genetically modified cultivars in Brazil. Trop. Plant Biol. 2011, 4, 62-89.
17. Mello, M.; Adami, M.; Rudorff, B.; Aguiar, D. Canasat Project Accuracy Assessment of Sugarcane Thematic Maps. In Proceeding of the 10th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Florianopolis, Brazil, 10-13 July 2012; pp. 281-286.
18. Weiss, M.; Baret, F.; Eerens, H.; Swinnen, E. FAPAR over Europe for the Past 29 Years: A Temporally Consistent Product Derived from AVHRR and VEGETATION Sensor. In Proceeding of the third RAQRS Workshop, Valencia, Spain, 27 September-1 October 2010; pp. 428-433.
19. Baret, F.; Hagolle, O.; Geiger, B.; Bicheron, P.; Miras, B.; Huc, M.; Berthelot, B.; Nino, F.; Weiss, M.; Samain, O.; et al. LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 110, 275-286.
20. Baruth, B.; Royer, A.; Klisch, A.; Genovese, G. The use of remote sensing within the MARS crop yield monitoring system of the European Commission. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. Spat. Inform. Sci. 2008, 37, 935-940.
21. Holben, B.N. Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1986, 7, 1417-1434.
22. Cracknell, A.P. Synergy in remote sensing-What's in a pixel? Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19, 2025-2047.
23. Duveiller, G.; Defourny, P. A conceptual framework to define the spatial resolution requirements for agricultural monitoring using remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 2637-2650.
24. Duveiller, G.; Baret, F.; Defourny, P. Crop specific green area index retrieval from MODIS data at regional scale by controlling pixel-target adequacy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 2686-2701.
25. Duveiller, G.; Baret, F.; Defourny, P. Using thermal time and pixel purity for enhancing biophysical variable time series: an inter-product comparison. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, in press.
26. Réaumur, R.A. Observations du thermomètre faites pendant l'année MDCCXXXV comparées à celles qui ont été faites sous la ligne à Isle-de-France, à Alger et en quelques-unes de nos Isles de l'Amérique. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences 1735, 545-576.
27. Bonhomme, R. Bases and limits to using 'degree.day' units. Eur. J. Agron. 2000, 13, 1-10.
28. Trudgill, D.L.; Honek, A.; Li, D.; Van Straalen, N.M. Thermal time-Concepts and utility. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2005, 146, 1-14.
29. Purcell, L.C. Comparison of thermal units derived from daily and hourly temperatures. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 1874-1879.
30. Atwell, B.J.; Kriedemann, P.E.; Turnbull, C.G.N. Plants in Action: Adaptation in Nature, Performance in Cultivation; Palgrave MacMillan: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 1999.
31. Whittaker, E.T. On a new method of graduation. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 1923, 41, 63-75.
32. Eilers, P.H.C. A perfect smoother. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 3631-3636.
33. Atzberger, C.; Eilers, P.H.C. Evaluating the effectiveness of smoothing algorithms in the absence of ground reference measurements. Inter. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 3689-3709.
34. Atzberger, C.; Eilers, P.H.C. A time series for monitoring vegetation activity and phenology at 10-daily time steps covering large parts of South America. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2011, 4, 365-386.
35. Atkinson, P.M.; Jeganathan, C.; Dash, J.; Atzberger, C. Inter-comparison of four models for smoothing satellite sensor time-series data to estimate vegetation phenology. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 123, 400-417.
36. Marin, F.R.; Carvalho, G.L. de Spatio-temporal variability of sugarcane yield efficiency in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2012, 47, 149-156.
37. Yin, X.; Kropff, M.J.; McLaren, G.; Visperas, R.M. A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 1995, 77, 1-16.
38. Yan, W.; Hunt, L.A. An equation for modelling the temperature response of plants using only the cardinal temperatures. Ann. Bot. 1999, 84, 607-614.
39. Mulianga, B.; Begue, A.; Simoes, M.; Todoroff, P. Forecasting regional sugarcane yield based on time integral and spatial aggregation of MODIS NDVI. Remote Sens. 2013, under review.
40. Wolfe, R.E.; Roy, D.P.; Vermote, E. MODIS land data storage, gridding, and compositing methodology: Level 2 grid. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1998, 36, 1324-1338.
41. Tan, B.; Woodcock, C.E.; Hu, J.; Zhang, P.; Ozdogan, M.; Huang, D.; Yang, W.; Knyazikhin, Y.; Myneni, R.B. The impact of gridding artifacts on the local spatial properties of MODIS data: Implications for validation, compositing, and band-to-band registration across resolutions. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 105, 98-114.
42. Duveiller, G. Caveats in calculating crop specific pixel purity for agricultural monitoring using MODIS time series. Proc. SPIE 2012, 8531, 85310J-1.
43. Baret, F.; Weiss, M.; Verger, A.; Kandasamy, S. BioPar Methods Compendium LAI, FAPAR and FCOVER from VEGETATION P Product Series. In Geoland 2-Towards an Operational GMES Land Monitoring Core Service. g2-BP-RP-BP038. Version 3.0.; Geoland2 Consortium, 2012.
44. Meroni, M.; Marinho, E.; Sghaier, N.; Verstrate, M.; Leo, O. Remote sensing based yield estimation in a stochastic framework-Case study of durum wheat in Tunisia. Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 539-557.