Bulked segregant analysis for relative water content to detect quantitative trait loci in wheat under drought stress

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 3882-3888

  Naroui Rad, M R ^a,b   Abdul Kadir, M ^a   Rafii, M Y ^a   Jaafar, H Z E ^a   Naghavi, M R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b Agriculture and Natural Resource Research Center   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Bulked segregant analysis; Drought tolerance; QTL; SSR markers; Wheat

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BREEDING METHOD; CHROMOSOME 5A; CHROMOSOME 5D; CULTIVAR; DROUGHT STRESS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT STRESS; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT; WATER CONTENT; WHEAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROUGHTS; GENETIC MARKERS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TRITICUM; WATER;

EID: 84874764911     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/2012.November.12.5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barrs HD and Watherley PE (1962). A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit inleaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 15: 413-428.
2. Blum A (1989). Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. Crop Sci. 29: 230-233.
3. Farquhar GD and Richards RA (1984). Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11: 539-552.
4. Govindaraj P, Arumugachamy S and Maheswaran M (2005). Bulked segregant analysis to detect main effect QTL associated with grain quality parameters in Basmati 370/ASD 16 cross in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using SSR markers. Euphytica 144: 61-68.
5. Liu BH (1998). Statistical Genomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 387-416.
6. Merah O (2001). Potential importance of water status traits for durum wheat improvement under Mediterranean conditions. J. Agric. Sci. 137: 139-145.
7. Michelmore RW, Paran I and Kesseli RV (1991). Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88: 9828-9832.
8. Peltonen-Sainio P and Mäkelä P (1995). Comparison of physiological methods to assess drought tolerance in oats. Acta Agric. Scand. 45: 32-38.
9. Price A and Courtois B (1999). Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in rice: progress, problems and prospects. Plant Growth Reg. 29: 123-133.
10. Röder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, et al. (1998). A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149: 2007-2023.
11. SAS Statistical Analysis Software (2001). Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary.
12. Schonfeld MA, Johnson RC, Carver BF and Mornhinweg DW (1988). Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci. 28: 526-531.
13. Sinclair TR and Ludlow MM (1985). Who taught plants thermodynamics? The unfulfilled potential of plant water potential. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 12: 213-217.
14. Singh J and Patel AL (1996). Water-status, gas exchange, proline accumulation and yield of wheat in response to water deficit. Ann. Biol. 12: 77-81.
15. Tahara M, Carver BF, Johnson RC and Smith EL (1990). Relationship between relative water content during reproductive development and winter wheat grain yield. Euphytica 49: 255-262.
16. Tanksley SD (1993). Mapping polygenes. Ann. Rev. Genet. 27: 205-233.
17. Teulat B, This D, Khairallah M, Borries C, et al. (1998). Several QTLs involved in osmotic-adjustment trait variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 688-698.
18. Tuberosa R and Salvi S (2006). Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 11: 405-412.