Familiarity Perception Call Elicited under Restricted Sensory Cues in Peer-Social Interactions of the Domestic Chick

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Koshiba, Mamiko ^a,b   Shirakawa, Yuka ^a   Mimura, Koki ^a   Senoo, Aya ^a   Karino, Genta ^a   Nakamura, Shun ^a,b  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; FEMALE; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RECOGNITION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIALIZATION;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHICKENS; COGNITION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84874764405     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058847     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Morton J, Johnson MH, (1991) CONSPEC and CONLERN: A Two-Process Theory of Infant Face Recognition. Psychological Review 98: 164-181.
2. Salva OR, Farroni T, Regolin L, Vallortigara G, (2011) The Evolution of Social Orienting: Evidence from Chicks (Gallus gallus) and Human Newborns. PLoS ONE 6: e18802.
3. Mascalzonia E, Regolina L, Vallortigara G, (2010) Innate sensitivity for self-propelled causal agency in newly hatched chicks. PNAS 107: 4483-4485.
4. Vallortigara G, Regolin L, Marconato F, (2005) Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns. PLoS Biology 3: e208.
5. Simion F, Regolin L, Bulf H, (2008) A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. PNAS 105: 809-813.
6. Klin A, Lin DJ, Gorrindo P, Ramsay G, Jones W, (2009) Two-year-olds with autism orient to nonsocial contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature 459: 257-261.
7. Brown J, Kaplan G, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G, (2010) Perception of biological motion in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): by females only. Anim Cogn 13: 555-564.
8. Vallortigara G, (1988) Chicks in a Novel Environment: Effects of Conspecific Calls. Ethology 78: 241-345.
9. Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ, (1994) Olfactory lateralization in the chick. Neuropsychologia 32: 417-423.
10. Johnson MH, (2005) Subcortical face processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 766-774.
11. Andrew RJ, (1969) Intracranial self-stimulation in the chick and the causation of emotional behavior. Annals New York Academy of Sciences 159: 625-639.
12. MacKay DM (1972) Formal analysis of communicative processes. In: Hinde RA eds. Non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3-25.
13. Kondo N, Watanabe S, (2009) Contact calls: Information and social function. Japanese Psychological Research 51: 197-208.
14. Braune P, Schmidt S, Zimmermann E, (2008) Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.). BMC Biol 6: 19.
15. Boughman JW, (1998) Vocal learning by greater spear-nosed bats. Proc Biol Sci 265: 227-233.
16. Lemasson A, Ouattara K, Petit EJ, Zuberbuhler K, (2011) Social learning of vocal structure in a nonhuman primate? BMC Evol Biol 11: 362.
17. Kondo N, Izawa E, Watanabe S, (2012) Crows cross-modally recognize group members but not non-group members. Proc Biol Sci 279: 1937-1942.
18. Collias N, Joos M, (1953) The Spectrographic analysis of sound signals of the domestic fowl. Behavior 5: 175-188.
19. Koshiba M, Mimura K, Sugiura Y, Okuya T, Senoo A, et al. (2011) Reading marmoset behavior 'semantics' under particular social context by multi-parameters correlation analysis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35: 1499-1504.
20. Tchernichovski O, Lints TJ, Deregnaucourt S, Cimenser A, Mitra PP, (2004) Studying the song development process: rationale and methods. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1016: 348-363.
21. Morton ES, (1977) On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. The American Naturalist 111: 855-869.
22. Muir DW, Abraham W, Forbes B, Harris LS, (1979) The ontogenesis of an auditory localization response from birth to four months of age. Canadian Journal of Psychology 33: 320-333.
23. Feltenstein MW, Sufka KJ, (2005) Screening antidepressants in the chick separation-stress paradigm. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 181: 153-159.
24. Kikusui T, Winslow JT, Mori Y, (2006) Social buffering: relief from stress and anxiety. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361: 2215-2228.
25. Bouchet H, Blois-Heulin C, Pellier AS, Zuberbühler K, Lemasson A, (2012) Acoustic variability and individual distinctiveness in the vocal repertoire of red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus). J Comp Psychol 126: 45-56.
26. Konishi M, (1963) The role of auditory feedback in the vocal behavior of the domestic fowl. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 20: 349-367.
27. Field SE, Rickard NS, Toukhsati SR, Gibbs ME, (2007) Maternal hen calls modulate memory formation in the day-old chick: the role of noradrenaline. Neurobiol Learn Mem 88: 321-330.
28. Bolhuis JJ, (1999) Early learning and the development of filial preferences in the chick. Behav Brain Res 98: 245-252.
29. Ellis JM, Riters LV, (2012) Vocal parameters that indicate threat level correlate with FOS immunolabeling in social and vocal control brain regions. Brain Behav Evol 79: 128-140.
30. Kent JP, (1989) On the Acoustic Basis of Recognition of the Mother Hen by the Chick in the Domestic-Fowl (Gallus-Gallus). Behaviour 108: 1-9.
31. Marx G, Leppelt J, Ellendorff F, (2001) Vocalisation in chicks (Gallus gallus dom.) during stepwise social isolation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75: 61-74.
32. Yazaki Y, Matsushima T, Aoki K, (1999) Testosterone modulates stimulation-induced calling behavior in Japanese quails. J Comp Physiol A 184: 13-19.
33. Panksepp J, (2011) Cross-species affective neuroscience decoding of the primal affective experiences of humans and related animals. PlosOne 6: e21236.
34. Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E, (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435: 673-676.
35. Ellis JM, Riters LV, (2012) Vocal parameters that indicate threat level correlate with FOS immunolabeling in social and vocal control brain regions. Brain Behav Evol 79: 128-140.
36. Bolhuis JJ (1999) Development of perceptual mechanisms in birds: predispositions and imprinting. In: Bolhuis JJ, Hogan JA eds. The development of animal behavior, A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. pp. 176-191.