Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients values in the prostate: Comparison among normal tissue, prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 222-232

  Liu, Xiaohang ^a,b   Peng, Weijun ^a,b   Zhou, Liangping ^a,b   Wang, He ^c  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY SHANGHAI CANCER CENTER   (China)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c GE HEALTHCARE   (China)

Author keywords

Biexponential decay; Diffusion weighted imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BIEXPONENTIAL APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATITIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIEXPONENTIAL DECAY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROSTATITIS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84874763576     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.222     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association. Clinicopathological statistics on registered prostate cancer patients in Japan: 2000 report from the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 2005;12:46-61.
2. Quinn M, Babb P. Patterns and trends in prostate cancer incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality. Part II: individual countries. BJU Int 2002;90:174-184.
3. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer 1999;80:827-841.
4. Wilkinson BA, Hamdy FC. State-of-the-art staging in prostate cancer. BJU Int 2001;87:423-430.
5. Quint LE, Van Erp JS, Bland PH, Del Buono EA, Mandell SH, Grossman HB, et al. Prostate cancer: correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. Radiology 1991;179:837-842.
6. Ikonen S, Kivisaari L, Tervahartiala P, Vehmas T, Taari K, Rannikko S. Prostatic MR imaging. Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders. Acta Radiol 2001;42:348-354.
7. Kim JK, Jang YJ, Cho G. Multidisciplinary functional MR imaging for prostate cancer. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:535-551.
8. Miao H, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T. Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007;61:297-302.
9. Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM, Kwon GY. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2007;42:842-847.
10. Jung DC, Lee HJ, Seo JW, Park SY, Lee SJ, Lee JH, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of a prostate cancer xenograft model seen on a 7 tesla animal MR scanner: comparison of ADC values and pathologic findings. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:82-89.
11. Mulkern RV, Vajapeyam S, Robertson RL, Caruso PA, Rivkin MJ, Maier SE. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficient parametrization in adult vs newborn brain. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:659-668.
12. Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen RM, Norris DG, van Lookeren Campagne M, Nicolay K. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:847-857.
13. Maier SE, Bogner P, Bajzik G, Mamata H, Mamata Y, Repa I, et al. Normal brain and brain tumor: multicomponent apparent diffusion coefficient line scan imaging. Radiology 2001;219:842-849.
14. Brugières P, Thomas P, Maraval A, Hosseini H, Combes C, Chafiq A, et al. Water diffusion compartmentation at high b values in ischemic human brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:692-698.
15. Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, Hung YP, Rybicki FJ, Maier SE, et al. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:563-568.
16. Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tanimoto A, Higuchi N, Okuda S, Kuribayashi S, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:355-359.
17. Villeirs GM, De Meerleer GO. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anatomy of the prostate and application of MRI in radiotherapy planning. Eur J Radiol 2007;63:361-368.
18. Gilbert G. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in sum-of-squares MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1678; author reply 1679.
19. Ren J, Huan Y, Wang H, Zhao H, Ge Y, Chang Y, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal prostate and differential diagnosis of prostate diseases. Abdom Imaging 2008;33:724-728.
20. Le Bihan D. The 'wet mind': water and functional neuroimaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:R57-R90.
21. McNeal JE. Normal histology of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12:619-633.
22. Nickel JC, True LD, Krieger JN, Berger RE, Boag AH, Young ID. Consensus development of a histopathological classification system for chronic prostatic inflammation. BJU Int 2001;87:797-805.
23. Chagas MA, Babinski MA, Costa WS, Sampaio FJ. Stromal and acinar components of the transition zone in normal and hyperplastic human prostate. BJU Int 2002;89:699-702.
24. Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S, Arihiro K, Fujimoto T, Yamada T, et al. Comparisons of multi b-value DWI signal analysis with pathological specimen of breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
25. Riches SF, Hawtin K, Charles-Edwards EM, de Souza NM. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients. NMR Biomed 2009;22:318-325