Performance testing of LiDAR exploitation software

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 54, Issue , 2013, Pages 122-129

  Varela Gonzalez M ^a   Gonzalez Jorge H ^a   Riveiro, B ^a   Arias, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

LiDAR software; Mobile LiDAR; Software stress test

Indexed keywords

AUTOCAD; CARLSON; COMPUTATIONAL REQUIREMENTS; GEOSCIENCES; LARGE DATASETS; LOADING TIME; MOBILE LIDAR; MOBILE LIDAR SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE TESTING; POINT CLOUD; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE TESTING; SOFTWARE SOLUTION; STRESS TEST;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA PROCESSING; OPTICAL RADAR; SOFTWARE TESTING; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

LOADING;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA PROCESSING; DATA SET; GIS; LIDAR; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84874755085     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. AutoCAD Civil 3D Webpage. 2012. http://usa.autodesk.com/civil-3d/Barber.
2. Barber D., Mills J., Smith-Voysey S. Geometric validation of a ground-based mobile laser scanning system. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2008, 63(1):128-141.
3. Bater C.W., Coops N. Evaluating error associated with LiDAR-derived DEM interpolation. Computers and Geoscience 2009, 35:289-300.
4. Bitenc M., Lindenbergh R., Khoshelham K., van A.P. Evaluation of a LiDAR land-based mobile mapping system for monitoring sandy coasts. Remote Sensing 2011, 3:1472-1491.
5. Carlson Webpage. 2012. http://www.carlsonsw.com/PL_CS_PointCloud.html.
6. Coveney S., Fotheringham A.S., Charlton M., McCarthy T. Dual-scale validation of a medium-resolution coastal DEM with terrestrial LiDAR DSM and GPS. Computers and Geosciences 2004, 36(4):489-499.
7. Denning P.J. The working set model for program behavior. Communications of the ACM 1968, 11(5):323-333.
8. El-Halawany, S.I., Lichti, D.D., 2011. Detection of rad poles from mobile terrestrial laser scanner point cloud. International Workshop on Multi-Platform/ Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing and Mapping, Art. no. 5697364.
9. Filin S. Surface classification from airborne laser scanning data. Computers and Geosciences 2004, 30(9-10):1033-1041.
10. Fledermaus Webpage. 2012. http://www.qps.nl/display/fledermaus/main;jsessionid=8712DAE9D3013FF1C114D31A988154DF.
11. Glennie C., Lichti D.D. Static calibration and analysis of the velodyne HDL-64E S2 for high accuracy mobile scanning. Remote Sensing 2010, 2(6):1610-1624.
12. González-Jorge H.-I., González-Aguilera D., Rodríguez-Gonzalvez P., Arias P. Monitoring of biological crusts in civil engineering structures using intensity data form terrestrial laser scanners. Construction and Building Materials 2012, 31:119-128.
13. González-Jorge H.-I.I., Solla M., Armesto J., Arias P. Novel method to determine laser scanner accuracy for applications in civil engineering. Optica Applicata 2012, 42(1):43-53.
14. Jones K.L., Poole G.C., O'Daniel S.J., Mertes L.A.K., Stanford J.A. Surface hydrology of low relief landscapes: assessing surface water flow impedance using LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. Remote Sensing of Environment 2008, 112(11):4148-4158.
15. Lato M., Kemeny J., Harrap R.M., Bevan G. Rock bench: establishing a common repository and standards for assessing rockmass characteristics using LiDAR and photogrammetry. Computers and Geosciences 2013, 50:106-114.
16. Mars Webpage. 2012. http://www.merrick.com/Geospatial/Services/MARS-Software.
17. Miranskyy A.V., Davison M., Reesor R.M., Murtaza S.S. Using entropy measures for comparison of software traces. Information Sciences 2012, 203:59-72.
18. Murray S., Haughey S., Brogan M., Fitzgerald C., McLoughlin S., Deegan C. Mobile mapping system for the automated detection and analysis of road delineation. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2011, 5(4):221-230.
19. Puente, I., González-Jorge, H., Riveiro, B., Arias, P. Accuracy verification of the Lynx Mobile Mapper system. Optics and Laser Technology, in press.
20. Oliveira M.V.N., Retouch S.E., McGaughey R.J., Andersen H.E. Estimating forest biomass and identifying low-intensity logging areas using airborne scanning LiDAR in Antimary State Forest, Acre State, Western Brazilian Amazon. Remote Sensing and Environment 2012, 124:479-491.
21. QT Modeler Webpage. 2012. http://www.appliedimagery.com.
22. Shahrokni A., Feldt R. A systematic review of software robustness. Information and Software Technology 2013, 55:1-17.
23. Singh O., Kapur P.K., Anand A. A multi-attribute approach for release time and reliability trend analysis of a software. International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management 2012, 3(2):246-254.
24. Studnicka N., Zach G. Mobile laser scanning in Venice: grand canal in scan and image data. GIM International 2011, 25(4):20-23.
25. Studnicka N., Zach G., Sevcik C., Milev I. Riding the rails. Geo Connexion 2011, 10(8):48-50.
26. TopoDOT Webpage. 2012. http://www.certainty3d.com/products/TopoDOT/.
27. Van Veenendaal E. Standard glossary of terms used in software testing. International Software Testing Qualifications Board, pp. 1-51 2010.
28. Wen H., Ma J., Zhang M., Ma.G. The comparison research of nonlinear curve fitting in Matlab and Labview. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Electrical and Electronics Engineering 2012, 74-77. article number 6258591.
29. Yang B., Fang L., Li Q., Li.J. Automated extraction of road markings from mobile LiDAR point clouds. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2012, 78(4):331-338.
30. Zhou G., Song C., Simmers J., Cheng P. Urban 3D GIS from LiDAR and digital aerial images. Computers and Geosciences 2004, 30(4):345-353.
31. Zhou K., Wang X., Hou G., Wang J., Shanbin Ai. Software reliability test based on Markov usage model. Journal of Software 2012, 7(9):2061-2068.