Trends in advanced imaging use for women undergoing breast cancer surgery

Cancer

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1251-1256

  Breslin, Tara M ^a   Banerjee, Mousumi ^a   Gust, Cathryn ^a   Birkmeyer, Nancy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; patterns of care; technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE SCINTISCANNING; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREND STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874720285     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27838     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML,. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103: 117-128.
2. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2011-2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2011. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/ acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-030975.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2011.
3. Dinan MA, Curtis LH, Hammill BG, et al. Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1999-2006. JAMA. 2010; 303: 1625-1631.
4. Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM,. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 2697-2704.
5. DeMichele A, Putt M, Zhang Y, Glick JH, Norman S,. Older age predicts a decline in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for patients with breast carcinoma: evidence from a tertiary care cohort of chemotherapy-eligible patients. Cancer. 2003; 97: 2150-2159.
6. Lazovich D, Raab KK, Gurney JG, Chen H,. Knowledge and preference for breast conservation therapy among women without breast cancer. Womens Health Issues. 2000; 10: 210-216.
7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Breast Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Fort Washington, PA: NCCN; 2010. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/PDF/breast.pdf. [Access date.]
8. Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007; 43: 1905-1917.
9. Morrow M,. Magnetic resonance imaging in the breast cancer patient: curb your enthusiasm. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 352-353.
10. Azzone V, Frank RG, Pakes JR, Earle CC, Hassett MJ,. Behavioral health services for women who have breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 706-712.
11. Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD,. Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998-2007. JAMA. 2010; 304: 1465-1471.
12. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB,. Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008; 27: 1491-1502.
13. Mitchell JM,. Utilization trends for advanced imaging procedures: evidence from individuals with private insurance coverage in California. Med Care. 2008; 46: 460-466.
14. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57: 75-89.
15. Houssami N, Hayes DF,. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59: 290-302.
16. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 375: 563-571.
17. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1233-1241.
18. American Society of Breast Surgeons. Position Statement on the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Surgical Oncology. Columbia, MD: American Society of Breast Surgeons; 2010. Available at: http://www.breastsurgeons.org/ statements/PDF-Statements/MRI.pdf. [Access date.]
19. Marcotte-Bloch C, Balu-Maestro C, Chamorey E, et al. MRI for the size assessment of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a prospective study of 33 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 77: 462-467.
20. Baker LC, Atlas SW, Afendulis CC,. Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008; 27: 1467-1478.
21. Government Accounting Office. Medicare pt B Imaging Services: Rapid Spending Growth and Shift to Physician Offices Indicate Need for CMS to Consider Additional Management Practices. Washington, DC: Government Accounting Office; 2008.
22. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute. National Program of Cancer Registries: 1999-2008 Incidence: WONDER [online database]. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2011. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/cancernpcr-v2008.html. Accessed November 2, 2011.
23. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, Virnig BA, Al-Refaie WB, Tuttle TM,. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3437-3441.
24. Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies 5 key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top 5 list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1715-1724.