Septorhinoplasty by disarticulation: Early assessment of a new technique for morphological correction of crooked noses

Rhinology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Boulanger, N ^a   Baumann, C ^b   Beurton, R ^c   Elueque, H ^a   Gallet, P ^a   Grosjean, R ^a   Lindas, P ^c   Lorentz, C ^a   Jankowski, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

^b CHU NANCY BRABOIS   (France)

^c Hôpital Belle Isle   (France)

Author keywords

Nasal bones; Nasal cartilages; Nose deformities; Rhinoplasty; Septum nasal surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NASAL BONE; NOSE CARTILAGE; NOSE INJURY; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; DISARTICULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NASAL BONE; NASAL CARTILAGES; NOSE DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84874717617     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4193/Rhino12.147     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Joseph J. Intranasale Nasenhöckerabtragung. Berl. Klin. Wochenschr. 1904; 650.
2. Cottle MH, Loring RM. Corrective surgery of the external nasal pyramid and the nasal septum for restoration of normal physiology. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon. 1947; 26: 207-212.
3. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001; 3: 7.
4. Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 469-480.
5. E.Dale Collins. Measuring Outcomes in Aesthetic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 481-482.
6. Anderson JR. A scale for evaluating results of rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985; 111: 520-523.
7. Rhee JS, McMullin BT. Measuring outcomes in facial plastic surgery: a decade of progress. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 16: 387-393.
8. Koch GG, Landis JR, Freeman JL, Freeman DH, Lehnen RC. A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 133-158.
9. Sjödén GO, Movin T, Güntner P, Aspelin P, Ahrengart L, Ersmark H, Sperber A. Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997; 68: 239-242.
10. Okur E, Yildirim I, Aydogan B, Akif Kilic M. Outcome of surgery for crooked nose: an objective method of evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004;28(4):203-207.
11. Stepnick D, Guyuron B. Surgical treatment of the crooked nose. Clin Plast Surg. 2010; 37: 313-325.
12. Constantian MB. An algorithm for correcting the asymmetrical nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83: 801-811.
13. Byrd HS, Salomon J, Flood J. Correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102: 2148-2157.
14. Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams WP. The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110: 1509-1525.
15. Pontius AT, Leach JL. New techniques for management of the crooked nose. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6: 263-266.
16. Fettman N, Sanford T, Sindwani R. Surgical management of the deviated septum: techniques in septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009; 42: 241-252.
17. Dinis PB, Haider H. Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002; 23: 85-90.
18. Jankowski R. The evo-devo origin of the nose, anterior skull base and midface. Paris: Springer Verlag, 2013. ISBN 978-2-8178- 0421-7.
19. Gubisch W. Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005; 7: 218-226.