The psychological impact of anal cancer screening on HIV-infected men

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 614-620

  Landstra, Jodie M B ^a,b   Ciarrochi, Joseph ^c   Deane, Frank Patrick ^a   Botes, Leon P ^b,d   Hillman, Richard J ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

anal cancer screening; HIV; oncology; worry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANUS CANCER; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS SYNDROME; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTED PATIENT; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIMISM; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; STRESS;

ADULT; AGED; ANUS NEOPLASMS; ANXIETY; AUSTRALIA; DEPRESSION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84874712954     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3040     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Darragh TM, Winkler B,. Anal cancer and cervical cancer screening: key differences. Cancer Cytopathol 2011; 119 (1): 5-19.
2. Guidelines SNY,. Human Papillomavirus: HIV Clinical Resource. Primary care approach to the HIV-infected patient. Preventative Medicine. [HIV Guidelines Website] 2007 Published March 2007; Available from: http://www.hivguidelines.org/clinical-guidelines/adults/management-of-stis-in- hiv-infected-patients/human-papillomavirus-hpv/.
3. Stewart-Brown S, Farmer A,. Screening could seriously damage your health. Br Med J 1997; 314 (7080): 533-534.
4. McNaughton-Collins M, et al., Psychological effects of a suspicious prostate cancer screening test followed by a benign biopsy result. Am J Med 2004; 117 (10): 719-725.
5. Shaw C, Abrams K, Marteau TM,. Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med (1982), 1999; 49 (12): 1571-1598.
6. McCaffery, KJ, Barratt AL,. Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better? J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58 (12): 968-970.
7. Barratt A, et al., Cancer screening. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56 (12): 899-902.
8. French DP, E Maissi, Marteau TM, Psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results. Br J Cancer 2004; 91 (11): 1887-1892.
9. Gray NM, et al., Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: anxiety and associated factors. Br J Cancer 2006; 94 (9): 1253-1262.
10. Wardle J, Pernet A, Stephens D, Psychological consequences of positive results in cervical cancer screening. Psychol Heal 1995; 10 (3): 185-194.
11. Brett J, et al., The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 2005; 14 (11): 917-938.
12. Lerman C, et al., Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol: Off J Div Health Psychol, Am Psychol Assoc 1991; 10 (4): 259-267.
13. Lerman C, et al., Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114 (8): 657-661.
14. Pickles T, et al., Psychosocial barriers to active surveillance for the management of early prostate cancer and a strategy for increased acceptance. Br J Urol Int 2007; 100 (3): 544-551.
15. Fowler FJ, et al., The impact of a suspicious prostate biopsy on patients' psychological, socio-behavioral, and medical care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (7): 715-721.
16. Herat A, Whitfeld M, Hillman R,. Anal intraepithelial neoplasia and anal cancer in dermatological practice. Australas J Dermatol 2007; 48 (3): 143-155.
17. Palefsky J,. Human papillomavirus infection in HIV-infected persons. Topics in HIV Medicine: a Publication of the International AIDS Society, USA 2007; 15 (4): 130-133.
18. Chin-Hong PV, et al., Comparison of patient- and clinician-collected anal cytology samples to screen for human papillomavirus-associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia in men who have sex with men. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149 (5): 300-63.
19. Tinmouth J, et al., The psychological impact of being screened for anal cancer in HIV-infected men who have sex with men. Dis Colon Rectum 2011. 54 (3): 352-359.
20. Newman PA, et al., Anal cancer screening: barriers and facilitators among ethnically diverse gay, bisexual, transgender, and other men who have sex with men. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv 2008; 20 (4): 328-353.
21. Pitts MK, et al., What do gay men know about human papillomavirus? Australian gay men's knowledge and experience of anal cancer screening and human papillomavirus. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 (3): 170-173.
22. Truesdale MD, Goldstone SE,. The fear factor: drivers and barriers to follow-up screening for human papillomavirus-related anal cancer in men who have sex with men. Int J STD AIDS 2010; 21 (7): 482-488.
23. Jacobsen PB, et al., Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 2005; 103 (7): 1494-1502.
24. Andrews G,. A brief integer scorer for the SF-12: validity of the brief scorer in Australian community and clinic settings. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002. 26 (6): 508-10.
25. Sanderson K, Andrews G,. The SF-12 in the Australian population: cross-validation of item selection. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002; 26 (4): 343-5.
26. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH, The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 1995; 33 (3): 335-343.
27. Henry JD, Crawford JR,. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol/ Br Psychol Soc 2005; 44 (Pt 2): 227-239.
28. Taupin D, et al., Colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer improves quality of life measures: a population-based screening study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 82-82.
29. Cantor SB, et al., Psychological benefits of prostate cancer screening: the role of reassurance. Heal Expect 2002; 5 (2): 104-113.
30. Barnoy S, Bar-Tal Y, Treister L,. Effect of unrealistic optimism, perceived control over disease, and experience with female cancer on behavioral intentions of Israeli women to undergo screening tests. Cancer Nurs 2003. 26 (5): 363-369.
31. Dillard AJ, McCaul KD, Klein WMP,. Unrealistic optimism in smokers: implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation. J Heal Commun 2006; 11 (SUPPL. 1): 93-102.
32. Larsen IK, et al., Impact of colorectal cancer screening on future lifestyle choices: a three-year randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 2007; 5 (4): 477-483.
33. Essink-Bot M, et al., Short-term effects of population-based screening for prostate cancer on health-related quality of life. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90 (12): 925-931.
34. Botes LP, et al., Participants' perspectives of self-collected anal cytological swabs. Sex Heal 2011; 8 (2): 257-258.
35. Palefsky J,. Human papillomavirus and anal neoplasia. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2008; 5 (2): 78-85.
36. Wilson JD, Hines B,. Nurse counselling for women with abnormal cervical cytology improves colposcopy and cytology follow up attendance rates. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76 (4): 322-322.
37. Wilkinson C, Jones JM, McBride J,. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1990; 300 (6722): 440-440.
38. Sharp L, et al., After-effects reported by women following colposcopy, cervical biopsies and LLETZ: results from the TOMBOLA trial. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 116 (11): 1506-1514.
39. Hounsgaard L, Petersen LK, Pedersen BD,. Facing possible illness detected through screening-experiences of healthy women with pathological cervical smears. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2007; 11 (5): 417-423.