Event-related potential correlates of sound organization: Early sensory and late cognitive effects

Biological Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 97-104

  Szalardy O ^a,b   Bohm, T M ^a,b   Bendixen, A ^c   Winkler, I ^a,d  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Early vs. late processes; Event related brain potentials (ERP); Oddball paradigm; Perceptual bistability

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH RECORDING; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SOUND ANALYSIS; SOUND TRANSMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84874705559     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anstis S., Saida S. Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11(3):257-271. 10.1037/0096-1523.11.3.257.
2. Bar M. The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(7):280-289. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005.
3. Bendixen A., Denham S.L., Gyimesi K., Winkler I. Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2010, 128(6):3658-3666. 10.1121/1.3500695.
4. Blake R., Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3(1):13-23. 10.1038/nrn701.
5. Brancucci A., Tommasi L. Binaural rivalry: dichotic listening as a tool for the investigation of the neural correlate of consciousness. Brain and Cognition 2011, 76(2):218-224. 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.007.
6. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Cusack R., Deeks J., Aikman G., Carlyon R.P. Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(4):643-656. 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.643.
8. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.
9. Denham S.L., Gyimesi K., Stefanics G., Winkler I. Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming. The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception 2010, 477-487. Springer, New York. E.A. Lopez-Poveda, A.R. Palmer, R. Meddis (Eds.).
10. Denham, S.L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I., Perceptual bi-stability in auditory streaming: how much do stimulus features matter? Learning and Perception, in press.
11. Denham S.L., Winkler I. The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. Journal of Physiology, Paris 2006, 100(1-3):154-170. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.012.
12. Escera C., Alho K., Schröger E., Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 2000, 5(3/4):151-166. 10.1159/000013877.
13. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2001, 25(4):355-373. 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00019-7.
14. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11(2):127-138. 10.1038/nrn2787.
15. Gutschalk A., Micheyl C., Melcher J.R., Rupp A., Scherg M., Oxenham A.J. Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(22):5382-5388. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 0347-05.2005.
16. Helson H. Adaptation-level Theory 1964, Harper & Row, Oxford, England.
17. Hill K.T., Bishop C.W., Miller L.M. Auditory grouping mechanisms reflect a sound's relative position in a sequence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:158. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00158.
18. Hill K.T., Bishop C.W., Yadav D., Miller L.M. Pattern of BOLD signal in auditory cortex relates acoustic response to perceptual streaming. BMC Neuroscience 2011, 12:85. 10.1186/1471-2202-12-85.
19. Hillyard S.A., Hink R.F., Schwent V.L., Picton T.W. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 1973, 182(108):177-180. 10.1126/science.182.4108.177.
20. Horváth J., Winkler I., Bendixen A. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?. Biological Psychology 2008, 79(2):139-147. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.001.
21. Kilian-Hütten N., Valente G., Vroomen J., Formisano E. Auditory cortex encodes the perceptual interpretation of ambiguous sound. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(5):1715-1720. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4572-10.2011.
22. Leopold D.A., Logothetis N.K. Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(7):254-264. 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7.
23. Leppert D., Goodin D.S., Aminoff M.J. Stimulus recognition and its relationship to the cerebral event-related potential. Neurology 2003, 61(11):1533-1537.
24. Moreno-Bote R., Shpiro A., Rinzel J., Rubin N. Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(11):1-18. 10.1167/10.11.1.
25. Müller D., Widmann A., Schröger E. Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. Psychophysiology 2005, 42(6):668-676. 10.1111/j. 1469-8986.2005.00355.x.
26. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound - a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24(4):375-425. 10.1111/j. 1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x.
27. Picton T.W. Human Auditory Evoked Potentials 2010, Plural Publishing, San Diego.
28. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118(10):2128-2148. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.
29. Pressnitzer D., Hupé J.M. Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology 2006, 16(13):1351-1357. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.054.
30. Purves D., Andrews T.J. The perception of transparent three-dimensional objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94(12):6517-6522. 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6517.
31. Railo H., Koivisto M., Revonsuo A. Tracking the processes behind conscious perception: a review of event-related potential correlates of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20(3):972-983. 10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.019.
32. Ritter W., Ruchkin D.S. A review of event-related potential components discovered in the context of studying P3. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1992, 658:1-32. 10.1111/j. 1749-6632.1992.tb22837.x.
33. Ritter W., Simson R., Vaughan H.G., Friedman D. A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science 1979, 203(4387):1358-1361. 10.1126/science.424760.
34. Roberts B., Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002, 112(5):2074-2085. 10.1121/1.1508784.
35. Roeber U., Widmann A., Trujillo-Barreto N.J., Herrmann C.S., O'Shea R.P., Schröger E. Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: time and place from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(3). 21.1-21.12. 10.1167/8.3.21.
36. Schadwinkel S., Gutschalk A. Transient bold activity locked to perceptual reversals of auditory streaming in human auditory cortex and inferior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 2011, 105(5):1977-1983. 10.1152/jn.00461.2010.
37. Schröger E. A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8(6):527-539. 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.527.
38. Snyder J.S., Alain C., Picton T.W. Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(1):1-13. 10.1162/089892906775250021.
39. Sussman E., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1999, 36(1):22-34. 10.1017/S0048577299971056.
40. Sussman E.S. A new view on the MMN and attention debate - the role of context in processing auditory events. Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 21(3/4):164-175. 10.1027/0269-8803.21.34.164.
41. Valle-Inclan F., Hackley S.A., de Labra C., Alvarez A. Early visual processing during binocular rivalry studied with visual evoked potentials. Neuroreport 1999, 10(1):21-25.
42. van Noorden, L.P.A.S., 1975. Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven.
43. Veser S., O'Shea R.P., Schroger E., Trujillo-Barreto N.J., Roeber U. Early correlates of visual awareness following orientation and colour rivalry. Vision Research 2008, 48(22):2359-2369. 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.024.
44. Wacongne C., Changeux J.P., Dehaene S. A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32(11):3665-3678. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-11.2012.
45. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 21(3/4):147-163. 10.1027/0269-8803.21.34.147.
46. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Nelken I. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13(12):532-540. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003.
47. Winkler I., Takegata R., Sussman E. Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25(1):291-299. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.005.