A comparison of hedonic price and stated preference methods to derive monetary values for aircraft noise disturbance and annoyance

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 20, Issue , 2013, Pages 40-47

  Matos, Joan Carles Blanco ^a   Flindell, Ian ^a   Le Masurier, Paul ^b   Pownall, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b MVA House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Air transportation; Contingent valuation method; Hedonic price indices; Noise pollution

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION; ECONOMICS; HOUSING; NOISE POLLUTION;

AIRCRAFT NOISE; CONTINGENT VALUATION METHODS; HEDONIC PRICES; HOUSE PRICES; HOUSING STOCK; MONETARY VALUE; NOISE METRICS; ONE-TIME; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; RESIDENTIAL AREAS; SAMPLE AREAS; SAMPLING TIME; SOUND LEVEL; STATED PREFERENCE METHOD; STATED PREFERENCES; STATISTICAL POWER; WEIGHTED AVERAGES;

COSTS;

AIR TRANSPORTATION; CONTINGENT VALUATION; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; NOISE POLLUTION; PRICE DYNAMICS;

EID: 84874697938     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Berry, B., Flindell, I., 2009. Estimating Dose-Response Relationships Between Noise Exposure and Human Health Impacts in the UK. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, London.
2. Bjørner T.B. Combining socio-acoustic and contingent valuation surveys to value noise reduction. Transportation Research Part D 2004, 9:341-356.
3. Eliasson, J., Lindqvist, D.J., Widell, J., Transek, A.B., 2002. Measuring Intrusion Trough Stated Preferences and Hedonic Prices - A Comparative Study. Association for European Transport. European Transport Proceedings, Homerton College, Cambridge.
4. Malpezzi, S., 2002. Hedonic pricing models: a selective and applied review. In: Gibb, K., O'Sullivan (Eds.), Housing Economics: Essays in Honor of Duncan Maclennan. The Center for Urban Land Economic Research, University of Wisconsin.
5. McMillen D. Airport expansions and property values: the case of Chicago O'Hare Airport. Journal of Urban Economics 2004, 55:627-640.
6. National Statistics UK. National Statistics website: 1998. Crown Copyright Material is reproduced with the Permission of the Controller of HMSO, 2001. UK, National Statistics. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/index.html.
7. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 1974, 82:34-55.
8. Soguel N. Contingent valuation of traffic noise reduction benefits. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 1996, 132:109-123.
9. Tomkins J., Topham N., Twomey J., Ward R. Noise versus access: the impact of an airport in an urban property market. Urban Studies 1998, 35:243-258.
10. UK Department for Transport, 2007. Attitudes to Noise from Aviation Sources in England (ANASE). http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/.
11. Vainio, M., 2001. Comparison of Hedonic Price and Contingent Valuation Methods in Urban Traffic Noise Context. Inter.noise 2001, The Hague.
12. Wilhelmsson M. The impact of traffic noise on the values of single-family houses. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2000, 43:799-815.