Revised system to evaluate measurement of blood chemistry data from the Japanese National health and nutrition survey and prefectural health and nutrition surveys

Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 28-34

  Nakamura, Masakazu ^a   Kiyama, Masahiko ^b   Kitamura, Akihiko ^b   Ishikawa, Yoshinori ^b   Sato, Shinichi ^c   Noda, Hiroyuki ^d,e   Yoshiike, Nobuo ^f  

^a NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

^b Osaka Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention   (Japan)

^c CHIBA PREFECTURAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

^d OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e Japan Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare   (Japan)

^f AOMORI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND WELFARE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Monitoring system; Precision; Total error

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; JAPAN; NUTRITION; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; JAPAN; NUTRITION SURVEYS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84874695834     PISSN: 09175040     EISSN: 13499092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20120032     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Westgard JO, Carey RN, Wold S. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation. Clin Chem. 1974;20:825-33.
2. Westgard JO, de Vos DJ, Hunt MR, Quam EF, Carey RN, Garber CC. Concepts and practices in the evaluation of clinical chemistry methods. V. Applications. Am J Med Technol. 1978;44:803-13.
3. Nakamura M, Sato S, Shimamoto T, Konishi M, Yoshiike N. Establishment of long-term monitoring system for blood chemistry data by the National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2008;15:244-9.
4. Teramoto T, Sasaki J, Ueshima H, Egusa G, Kinoshita M, Shimamoto K, et al. Metabolic syndrome. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2008;15:1-5.
5. Annual report on the external quality assessment of clinical laboratory by Japan Medical Association, 2010
6. NCCLS. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline. NCCLS document EP9-A (ISBN 1-56238-283-7). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087 USA, 1995.
7. NCCLS. Precision performance of clinical chemistry devicessecond editions; Tentative guideline, EP5-T2, 1992.
8. NCCLS. Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods-second edition; Tentative guideline, EP10-T2, 1993.
9. Bachorik PS, Ross JW. National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: executive summary. The National Cholesterol Education Program Working Group on Lipoprotein Measurement. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1414-20.
10. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci. 1986;1:54-75.
11. CAP Surveys 2010, Participant summary, Chemistry/ Therapeutic drug monitoring
12. Nakamura M, Koyama I, Iso H, Sato S, Okazaki M, Kayamori Y, et al. Ten-year evaluation of homogeneous low-density lipoprotein cholesterol methods developed by Japanese manufacturers-Application of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network lipid standardization protocol-. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010;17:1275-81.
13. Yoshiike N, Udagawa K, Sumikura T. Current situations of prefectural health and nutrition surveys. In the research report on risk factors for lifestyle-related diseases in 47 prefectures- analysis on diversity and methodology for monitoring surveys. 2008:104-9.
14. Klee GG, Killeen AA. College of American Pathologies 2003 fresh frozen serum proficiency testing studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:292-3.
15. Gurr E, Koller U, Blaton V, Lund E, Harmoinen A, Zerah S, et al. The European register for specialists in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: guide to the register version 2-2003 and procedure for re-registration. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003 Feb;41:238-47.
16. Nauck M, Graziani MS, Jarausch J, Bruton D, Cobbaert C, Cole TG, et al. A new liquid homogeneous assay for HDL cholesterol determination evaluated in seven laboratories in Europe and the United States. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:1067-76.
17. Nauck M, Neumann I, März W, Wieland H. A new liquid homogeneous assay for the determination of HDL-cholesterol. A comparison to precipitation with phosphotungstic acid/MgCl2 and a lyophilized homogeneous assay. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:537-43.
18. Miller WG, Myers GL, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann LM, Caudill SP, Dziekonski A, et al. Seven direct methods for measuring HDL and LDL cholesterol compared with ultracentrifugation reference measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2010;56: 977-86.
19. van Deventer HE, Miller WG, Myers GL, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann LM, Caudill SP, et al. Non-HDL cholesterol shows improved accuracy for cardiovascular risk score classification compared to direct or calculated LDL cholesterol in a dyslipidemic population. Clin Chem. 2011;57:490-501.
20. Weber JA, van Zanten AP. Interferences in current methods for measurements of creatinine. Clin Chem. 1991 May;37:695-700.
21. Panteghini M. Enzymatic assays for creatinine: time for action. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2008;241:84-8.