Addressing public risks: Extreme events and critical infrastructures

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 139-159

  May, Peter J ^a   Koski, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b REED COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Governance; Partnerships; Risks

Indexed keywords

EXTREME EVENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84874685353     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12012     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Berke, P., & Beatley, T. (1992). Planning for earthquakes: Risk, politics and policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4. Brown, K. A. (2006). Critical path: A brief history of critical infrastructure protection in the United States. Fairfax, VA: Spectrum Publishing Group, Inc.
5. Burby, R. J. (Ed.). (1998). Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry/National Academy Press.
6. Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter, citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33-49.
7. Burby, R. J., & May, P. J. (1998). Intergovernmental environmental planning: Addressing the commitment conundrum. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(1), 95-110.
8. Camerer, C. F., & Kunreuther, H. (1989). Decision processes for low probability risks: Policy implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8(Fall), 565-592.
9. Chisholm, D. (1989). Coordination without hierarchy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. Derthick, M. (1972). New towns in town. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
11. Gregory, R., Bostrom, A., Rix, G., & Harstone, M. (2012). Seismic risk mitigation decisions at ports: Multiple challenges, multiple perspectives. Natural Hazards Review, 13(1), 88-95.
12. Hayes, J. K., & Ebinger, C. K. (2011). The private sector and the role of risk and responsibility in securing the nation's infrastructure. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1), 1-25.
13. Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87-124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
14. Huber, P. W. (1986). The Bhopalization of American tort law. In National Academy of Engineering (Ed.), Hazards: Technology and fairness (pp. 89-110). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. Kunreuther, H. (2006). Disaster mitigation and insurance: Learning from Katrina. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(March), 208-227.
16. Kunreuther, H., & Heal, G. (2003). Interdependent security. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(2/3), 231-249.
17. Linder, S. H. (2000). Coming to terms with the public-private partnership. In P. V. Rosenau (Ed.), Public-private policy partnerships (pp. 19-35). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. May, P. J. (1991). Addressing public risks: Federal earthquake policy design. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(Spring), 263-285.
19. May, P. J., & Birkland, T. A. (1994). Earthquake risk reduction: An examination of local regulatory efforts. Environmental Management, 18(6), 923-937.
20. May, P. J., & Williams, W. (1986). Disaster policy implementation: Management strategies under shared governance. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
21. McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 33-42.
22. Meszaros, J. R. (1999). Preventative choices: Organizations' heuristics, decision processes and catastrophic risks. Journal of Management Studies, 36(7), 977-998.
23. Moss, D. A. (2002). When all else fails, government as the ultimate risk manager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Moteff, J. (2010). Critical infrastructures: Background, policy, and implementation (CRS Report RL 30153). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
25. Moynihan, D. P., Fernandez, S., Kim, S., LeRoux, K. M., Pitrowski, S. J., Wright, B. E., & Yang, K. (2011). Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 1), i141-i155.
26. National Research Council. (2011). Building community disaster resilience through public-private collaboration (Committee on Private-Public Sector Collaboration to Enhance Community Disaster Resilience, Geographical Science Committee). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
27. O'Toole, L. J., Jr. (2003). Interorganizational relations in implementation. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 234-244). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of co-ordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295-311.
29. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2005). Governing complex societies, trajectories and scenarios. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
30. Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2008). Policy network analysis. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Godin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 425-447). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Stoker, R. P. (1991). Reluctant partners: Implementing federal policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
33. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2006). National infrastructure protection plan. Washington, DC: DHS.
34. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2009). National infrastructure protection plan. Washington, DC: DHS.
35. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2010). Critical infrastructure partnership advisory council annual. Washington, DC: DHS.
36. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2006). Critical infrastructure protection: Progress coordinating government and private sector efforts varies by sectors' characteristics (GAO-07-39). Washington, DC: U.S. GAO.
37. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Critical infrastructure: Sector plans complete and sector councils evolving (GAO-07-1075T). Washington, DC: U.S. GAO.
38. U.S. Office of the President. (2003). National strategy for the protection of infrastructures and key assets. Washington, DC: White House.
39. Weiss, J. A. (2002). Public information. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 217-254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Vedlitz, A., Grover, H., & Miller, C. (2008). Explaining local commitment to climate change policy in the United States. Environment and Planning. C, 26(3), 544-562.