An evaluation of medication review reports across different settings

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 5-13

  Freeman, Christopher R ^a   Cottrell, W Neil ^a   Kyle, Greg ^b   Williams, Ian D ^a   Nissen, Lisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Drug related problems; General Practice; HMR; Medication review; Pharmacist

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADD ON THERAPY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG INDUCED DISEASE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PHARMACIST; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AUSTRALIA; DRUG TOXICITY; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HUMANS; MEDICATION ERRORS; PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES; PHARMACISTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84874664122     PISSN: 22107703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-012-9701-8     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. The Pharmacy Guild of Australia. Home Medicines Reviews. [Internet] Canberra: The Pharmacy Guild of Australia; 2011 [28 May 2011]; Available from: http://www.guild.org.au/The-Guild/tab-Pharmacy-Services-and-Programs/ Medications-Management/Home-Medicines-Review/Home+Medicines+Reviews.page?.
2. Campbell Research and Consulting Pty Ltd. Home medicines review program qualitative research project final report. Canberra, Department of Health & Ageing; 2008.
3. Ackermann E, Williams I, Freeman C. Pharmacists in general practice-a proposed role in the multidisciplinary team. Aust Fam Physician. 2010;39(3):163-4.
4. Stafford L, Peterson GM, Bereznicki LR, Jackson SL, van Tienen EC, Angley MT, et al. Clinical outcomes of a collaborative, home-based post discharge warfarin management service. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(3):325-34.
5. Roughead EE, Barratt JD, Ramsay E, Pratt N, Ryan P, Peck R, et al. The effectiveness of collaborative medicine reviews in delaying time to next hospitalization for patients with heart failure in the practice setting: results of a cohort study. Circ Heart Fail. 2009;2(5):424-8.
6. Stafford A, Tenni P, Peterson G, Doran C, Kelly W. VALMER (the Economic Value of Home Medication Reviews). Canberra, The Pharmacy Guild of Australia;2010. Report No.: IIG-021.
7. Holland R, Desborough J, Goodyer L, Hall S, Wright D, Loke YK. Does pharmacist-led medication review help to reduce hospital admissions and deaths in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(3):303-16.
8. Niquille A, Bugnon O. Relationship between drug-related problems and health outcomes: a cross-sectional study among cardiovascular patients. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32(4):512-9.
9. Castelino RL, Bajorek BV, Chen TF. Retrospective evaluation of home medicines review by pharmacists in older australian patients using the medication appropriateness index. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(12):1922-9.
10. Sorensen L, Stokes JA, Purdie DM, Woodward M, Elliott R, Roberts MS. Medication reviews in the community: results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58(6):648-64.
11. Vinks TH, Egberts TC, de Lange TM, de Koning FH. Pharmacist-based medication review reduces potential drug-related problems in the elderly: the SMOG controlled trial. Drugs Aging. 2009;26(2):123-33.
12. Krska J, Cromarty JA, Arris F, Jamieson D, Hansford D, Duffus PR, et al. Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care. Age Ageing. 2001;30(3):205-11.
13. The Pharmacy Guild of Australia. Program specific guidelines: home medicines review. [Online] Canberra2011 [09/11/2011]; Available from: http://www.5cpa.com.au/iwov-resources/documents/5CPA/Initiatives/ Medication-Management/Home-Medicines-Review/HMRProgramSpecificGuidelinesOct2011. pdf.
14. Freeman C, Cottrell WN, Kyle G, Williams I, Nissen L. does a primary care practice pharmacist improve the timeliness and completion of medication management reviews? International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2012;(in Press).
15. Mitchell G, Senior H, Foster M, Williams I, Chaffey J, Chambers R, et al. The role of allied health in the management of complex conditions in a comprehensive primary care setting. Canberra: Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute; 2012.
16. Bennett A, Smith C, Chen T, Johnson S, R H. A comparative study of two collaborative models for the provision of domiciliary medication review: St George Canterbury Medico/Pharmacy Project - Executive Report. Sydney, Australia University of Sydney and St George Division of General Practice; 2000; Available from: http://beta.guild.org.au/uploadedfiles/Medication-Management-Reviews/ Overview/St-George-Executive-summary-report-2000.doc.
17. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe. The PCNE Classification V 6.2. [Online]: Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Foundation; 2010 [07/11/2011]; Available from: http://www.pcne.org/sig/drp/documents/ PCNE%20classification%20V6-2.pdf.
18. Stafford AC, Tenni PC, Peterson GM, Jackson SL, Hejlesen A, Villesen C, et al. Drug-related problems identified in medication reviews by Australian pharmacists. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(2):216-23.
19. Castelino RL, Bajorek BV, Chen TF. Are interventions recommended by pharmacists during Home Medicines Review evidence-based? J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(1):104-10.
20. Uribis Keys Young. Evaluation of the Home Medicines Review program (Pharmacy Component). [Online] Canberra: Pharmacy Guild of Australia; 2005 [15/11/2011]; Available from: http://beta.guild.org.au/uploadedfiles/Medication- Management-Reviews/Overview/Urbis%20Keys%20Young%20evaluation.pdf.