Investigating the influence of QoS on personal evaluation behaviour in a mobile context

Multimedia Tools and Applications

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 335-358

  De Pessemier, Toon ^a   De Moor, Katrien ^a   Ketykó, István ^a   Joseph, Wout ^a   De Marez, Lieven ^a   Martens, Luc ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Mobile; Quality of experience; Quality of service; Recommendation; User experience; User feedback

Indexed keywords

LOADING; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

MOBILE; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); RECOMMENDATION; USER EXPERIENCE; USER FEEDBACK;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 84874658221     PISSN: 13807501     EISSN: 15737721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-010-0712-y     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aljukhadar M, Senecal S, Daoust CE (2010) Information overload and usage of recommendations. In: Proceedings of the ACM RecSys 2010 workshop on User-Centric Evaluation of Recommender Systems and Their Interfaces (UCERSTI). CEUR-WS.org
2. Bell RM, Koren Y (2007) Lessons from the netflix prize challenge. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 9(2):75-79. doi:10.1145/1345448.1345465
3. Breese J, Heckerman D, Kadie C (1998) Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 14th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Madison, USA, pp 43-52
4. Cha M, Kwak H, Rodriguez P, Ahn YY, Moon S (2007) I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system. In: IMC '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, New York, pp 1-14. doi: 10.1145/1298306.1298309
5. Chung ET, Du Q, Zou J (2007) Video quality experts group, "Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment, " vqeg, 2000. Available at ftp://ftp.its.bldrdoc.gov/dist/ituvidq. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/ summary?doi=?doi=10.1.1.15.7470
6. Claypool M, Gokhale A, Miranda T, Murnikov P, Netes D, Sartin M (1999) Combining contentbased and collaborative filters in an online newspaper. In: Proceedings ofACMSIGIR workshop on recommender systems
7. De Moor K, Ketyko I, Joseph W, Deryckere T, De Marez L, Martens L, Verleye G (2010) Proposed framework for evaluating quality of experience in a mobile, testbed-oriented living lab setting.Mobile Networks and Applications 15:378-391. doi:10.1007/s11036-010-0223-0. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11036-010-0223-0
8. De Pessemier T, Deryckere T, Martens L (2009) Context aware recommendations for usergenerated content on a social network site. In: EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the seventh european conference on European interactive television conference. ACM, New York, pp 133-136. doi:10.1145/1542084.1542108
9. Følstad A (2008) Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks (Special Issue on Living Labs) 10:99-131
10. Good, N, Schafer JB, Konstan JA, Borchers A, Sarwar B, Herlocker J, Riedl J (1999) Combining collaborative filtering with personal agents for better recommendations. In: Proceedings of the sixteenth national conference on artificial intelligence, pp 439-446
11. Heckerman D, Chickering DM, Meek C, Rounthwaite R, Kadie C (2001) Dependency networks for inference, collaborative filtering, and data visualization. J Mach Learn Res 1:49-75. doi:10.1162/153244301753344614. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/153244301753344614
12. Jacobson V (1989) "tcpdump packet analyzer". The tcpdump manual page
13. Jumisko SH, Ilvonen VP, Vaananen-Vainio-Mattila KA (2005) Effect of tv content in subjective assessment of video quality on mobile devices. SPIE, Bellingham, pp 243-254. doi:10.1117/12. 596503. URL: http://link.aip.org/link/? PSI/5684/243/1
14. Jumisko-Pyykkö S (2008) "I would like to see the subtitles and the face or at least hear the voice": effects of picture ratio and audio-video bitrate ratio on perception of quality in mobile television. Multimedia ToolsAppl 36:167-184. doi:10.1007/s11042-006-0080-9. URL: http://portal. acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1327423.1327428
15. Jumisko-Pyykkö S, Häkkinen J (2005) Evaluation of subjective video quality of mobile devices. In: MULTIMEDIA '05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 535-538. doi:10.1145/1101149.1101270
16. Karypis G (2001) Evaluation of item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. In: CIKM '01: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, New York, pp 247-254. doi:10.1145/502585.502627
17. Knoche H, McCarthy JD, Sasse MA (2005) Can small be beautiful?: assessing image resolution requirements for mobile tv. In: MULTIMEDIA '05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 829-838. doi:10.1145/1101149.1101331
18. Korhonen J, Reiter U, Myakotnykh E (2010) On the relative importance of audio and video in the presence of packet losses. In: 2010 second international workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp 64-69. doi:10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5518112
19. Kortum P (2004) Content is king: the effect of content on the perception of video quality. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 48(5):1910-1914. URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hfes/ hfproc/2004/00000048/00000016/art00025
20. Kortum P (2010) The effect of content desirability on subjective video quality ratings. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52(14):105-118. URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hfes/hf/2010/ 00000052/00000001/art00009
21. Linden G, Smith B, York J (2003) Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. Internet Computing, IEEE 7(1):76-80. doi:10.1109/MIC.2003.1167344
22. Miller BN, Albert I, Lam SK, Konstan JA, Riedl J, Miller BN, Albert I, Lam SK, Riedl JAKJ (2003) Movielens unplugged: experiences with a recommender system on four mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on intelligent user interfaces
23. Mooney RJ, Roy L (2000) Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on digital libraries, DL '00. ACM, New York, pp 195-204. doi:10.1145/336597.336662. URL: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/336597.336662
24. Oard D, Kim J (1998) Implicit feedback for recommender systems. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu. edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.49.3097
25. Pennock DM, Lawrence S, Popescul R, Ungar LH (2001) Probabilistic models for unified collaborative and content-based recommendation in sparse-data environments
26. Pfeiffer S, SrinivasanU(2000) Tv anytime as an application scenario for mpeg-7. In:MULTIMEDIA '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM workshops on multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 89-92. doi:10.1145/357744.357885
27. Resnick P, Varian HR (1997) Recommender systems. Commun ACM 40:56-58. doi:10.1145/ 245108.245121. URL: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/245108.245121
28. Sarwar BM, Karypis G, Konstan JA, Riedl JT (2000) Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system-a case study. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? doi=?doi=10.1.1.38.744
29. Schein AI, Popescul A, Ungar LH, Pennock DM (2002) Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In: SIGIR '02: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, New York, pp 253-260. doi:10.1145/564376.564421
30. Schumacher J, Feurstein K, Pitkänen O, Niitamo VP (2008) European living labs: a new approach for human centric regional innovation. Wissenschaftlicher, Berlin
31. Schuurman D, Evens T, De Marez L (2009) A living lab research approach for mobile tv. In: EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the seventh European conference on European interactive television conference. ACM, New York, pp 189-196. doi:10.1145/1542084.1542122
32. Senter HF (2008) Applied linear statistical models, 5th edn. In: Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, Li W (eds) Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol 103, pp 880-880. URL: http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes: jnlasa:v:103:y:2008:m:june:p:880-880
33. Sullivan M, Pratt J, Kortum P (2008) Practical issues in subjective video quality evaluation: human factors vs. psychophysical image quality evaluation. In: UXTV '08: Proceeding of the 1st international conference on designing interactive user experiences for TV and video. ACM, New York, pp 1-4. doi:10.1145/1453805.1453807
34. Tseng BL, Yung Lin C, Smith JR (2002) Video summarization and personalization for pervasive mobile devices. In: SPIE electronic imaging-storage & retrieval for media databases, pp 359-370
35. Ungar LH, Foster DP (1998) Clustering methods for collaborative filtering. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=?doi=10.1.1.44. 7783
36. Wang HC, Lee CS, Ho TH (2007) Combining subjective and objective qos factors for personalized web service selection. Expert Syst Appl 32(2):571-584. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.034. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/B6V03-4J84RXD-4/2/0ec2a61005d6175e995650b2d6968ab1
37. Yu Z, Lin N, Nakamura Y, Kajita S, Mase K (2007) Fuzzy recommendation towards qos-aware pervasive learning. In: 21st international conference on advanced information networking and applications, 2007. AINA '07, pp 604-610. doi:10.1109/AINA.2007.73
38. Yu Z, Zhou X (2004) Tv3p: an adaptive assistant for personalized tv. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 50(1):393-399. doi:10.1109/TCE.2004.1277889
39. Yu Z, Zhou X, Hao Y, Gu J (2006) Tv program recommendation for multiple viewers based on user profile merging. User Model User-Adapt Interact 16:63-82. doi:10.1007/s11257-006-9005-6. URL: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id= 1146521.1146531
40. Zhang H, Zheng S, Yuan J (2005) A personalized tv guide system compliant with mhp. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 51(2):731-737. doi:10.1109/TCE.2005.1468026