Remote ischemic preconditioning: The surgeon's perspective

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 187-192

  Thielmann, Matthias ^a   Wendt, Daniel ^a   Tsagakis, Konstantinos ^a   Price, Vivien ^a   Dohle, Daniel Sebastian ^a   Pasa, Susanne ^a   Kottenberg, Eva ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac surgery; Ischemia reperfusion injury; Preconditioning; Remote ischemic

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE MB; TROPONIN I; TROPONIN T;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART MUSCLE INJURY; HEART MUSCLE NECROSIS; HEART PROTECTION; HEART SURGERY; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; KIDNEY INJURY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURGEON; SURGICAL INJURY;

CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING, MYOCARDIAL; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY;

EID: 84874657155     PISSN: 15582027     EISSN: 15582035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283590df6     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Vinten-Johansen J, Thourani VH. Myocardial protection: an overview. J Extra Corpor Technol 2000; 32:38-48.
2. Buckberg GD, Brazier JR, Nelson RL, et al. Studies of the effects of hypothermia on regional myocardial blood flow and metabolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. I. The adequately perfused beating, fibrillating, and arrested heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73:87-94.
3. Rosenkranz ER. Myocardial protection during surgical coronary reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1:1235-1246.
4. Hearse DJ. Cardioplegia: the protection of the myocardium during open heart surgery: a review. J Physiol (Paris) 1980; 76:751-768.
5. Heusch G. Postconditioning: old wine in a new bottle? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:1111-1112.
6. Musiolik J, van Caster P, Skyschally A, et al. Reduction of infarct size by gentle reperfusion without activation of reperfusion injury salvage kinases in pigs. Cardiovasc Res 2010; 85:110-117.
7. Skyschally A, Schulz R, Heusch G. Pathophysiology of myocardial infarction: protection by ischemic pre and postconditioning. Herz 2008; 33:88-100.
8. Heusch G. Nitroglycerin and delayed preconditioning in humans: yet another new mechanism for an old drug? Circulation 2001; 103:2876-2878.
9. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986; 74:1124-1136.
10. Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M, Kloner RA, Whittaker P. Regional ischemic 'preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation 1993; 87:893-899.
11. Birnbaum Y, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Ischemic preconditioning at a distance: reduction of myocardial infarct size by partial reduction of blood supply combined with rapid stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle in the rabbit. Circulation 1997; 96:1641-1646.
12. Kharbanda RK, Peters M, Walton B, et al. Ischemic preconditioning prevents endothelial injury and systemic neutrophil activation during ischemia-reperfusion in humans in vivo. Circulation 2001; 103:1624-1630.
13. Weinbrenner C, Nelles M, Herzog N, Sárváry L, Strasser RH. Remote preconditioning by infrarenal occlusion of the aorta protects the heart from infarction: a newly identified nonneuronal but PKC-dependent pathway. Cardiovasc Res 2002; 55:590-601.
14. Heusch G, Schulz R. Remote preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2002; 34:1279-1281.
15. Ren C, Gao X, Steinberg GK, Zhao H. Limb remote-preconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats and contradicts the dogma of therapeutic time windows for preconditioning. Neuroscience 2008; 151:1099-1103.
16. Waldow T, Alexiou K, Witt W, et al. Protection against acute porcine lung ischemia/reperfusion injury by systemic preconditioning via hind limb ischemia. Transpl Int 2005; 18:198-205.
17. Cheung MMH, Kharbanda RK, Konstantinov IE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:2277-2282.
18. Kanoria S, Jalan R, Davies NA, Seifalian AM, Williams R, Davidson BR. Remote ischaemic preconditioning of the hind limb reduces experimental liver warm ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Br J Surg 2006; 93:762-768.
19. Ateş E, Genç E, Erkasap N, et al. Renal protection by brief liver ischemia in rats. Transplantation 2002; 74:1247-1251.
20. Ali ZA, Callaghan CJ, Lim E, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2007; 116:I98-105.
21. Zhou W, Zeng D, Chen R, et al. Limb ischemic preconditioning reduces heart and lung injury after an open heart operation in infants. Pediatr Cardiol 2010; 31:22-29.
22. Lee J-H, Park Y-H, Byon H-J, Kim H-S, Kim C-S, Kim J-T. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on ischaemic-reperfusion injury in pulmonary hypertensive infants receiving ventricular septal defect repair. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:223-228.
23. Li L, Luo W, Huang et al. Remote perconditioning reduces myocardial injury in adult valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 2010; 164:e21-e26.
24. Wu Q, Gui P, Wu J, et al. Effect of limb ischemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Circ J 2011; 75:1885-1889.
25. Xie J-J, Liao X-L, Chen W-G, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing heart valve surgery: randomised controlled trial. Heart 2012; 98:384-388.
26. Günaydin B, Cakici I, Soncul H, et al. Does remote organ ischaemia trigger cardiac preconditioning during coronary artery surgery? Pharmacol Res 2000; 41:493-496.
27. Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, et al. Effect ofremote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370:575-579.
28. Venugopal V, Hausenloy DJ, Ludman A, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Heart 2009; 95:1567-1571.
29. Ali N, Rizwi F, Iqbal A, Rashid A. Induced remote ischemic preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20:427-431.
30. Thielmann M, Kottenberg E, Boengler K, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass surgery with crystalloid cardioplegic arrest. Basic Res Cardiol 2010; 105:657-664.
31. Wagner R, Piler P, Bedanova H, Adamek P, Grodecka L, Freiberger T. Myocardial injury is decreased by late remote ischaemic preconditioning and aggravated by tramadol in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11:758-762.
32. Kottenberg E, Thielmann M, Bergmann L, et al. Protection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with isoflurane but not propofol: a clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:30-38.
33. Heusch G, Musiolik J, Kottenberg E, Peters J, Jakob H, Thielmann M. STAT5 activation and cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning in humans: short communication. Circ Res 2012; 110:111-115.
34. Fellahi J-L, Gué X, Richomme X, Monier E, Guillou L, Riou B. Short-and long-term prognostic value of postoperative cardiac troponin I concentration in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:270-274.
35. Force T, Hibberd P, Weeks G, et al. Perioperative myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery. Clinical significance and approach to risk stratification. Circulation 1990; 82:903-912.
36. Califf RM, Abdelmeguid AE, Kuntz RE, et al. Myonecrosis after revascularization procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:241-251.
37. Thielmann M, Massoudy P, Schmermund A, et al. Diagnostic discrimination between graft-related and nongraft-related perioperative myocardial infarction with cardiac troponin I after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:2440-2447.
38. Lehrke S, Steen H, Sievers HH, et al. Cardiac troponin T for prediction of short-and long-term morbidity and mortality after elective open heart surgery. Clin Chem 2004; 50:1560-1567.
39. Croal BL, Hillis GS, Gibson PH, et al. Relationship between postoperative cardiac troponin I levels and outcome of cardiac surgery. Circulation 2006; 114:1468-1475.
40. Mohammed AA, Agnihotri AK, van Kimmenade RRJ, et al. Prospective, comprehensive assessment of cardiac troponin T testing after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 2009; 120:843-850.
41. Rahman IA, Mascaro JG, Steeds RP, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning in human coronary artery bypass surgery: from promise to disappointment? Circulation 2010; 122:S53-S59.
42. Karuppasamy P, Chaubey S, Dew T, et al. Remote intermittent ischemia before coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a strategy to reduce injury and inflammation? Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106:511-519.
43. Lucchinetti E, Bestmann L, Feng J, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning applied during isoflurane inhalation provides no benefit to the myocardium of patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: lack of synergy or evidence of antagonism in cardioprotection? Anesthesiology 2012; 116:296-310.
44. Lomivorotov VV, Shmyrev VA, Nepomnyaschih VA, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning does not protect the heart in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15:18-22.
45. Young PJ, Dalley P, Garden A, et al. A pilot study investigating the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in high-risk cardiac surgery using a randomised controlled double-blind protocol. Basic Res Cardiol 2012; 107:256.
46. Hong DM, Mint JJ, Kim JH, et al. The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38:924-929.
47. Pavione MA, Carmona F, de Castro M, Carlotti APCP. Late remote ischemic preconditioning in children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144:178-183.
48. Heusch G. Reduction of infarct size by ischaemic postconditioning in humans: fact or fiction? Eur Heart J 2012; 33:13-15.
49. Swaanenburg JC, Loef BG, Volmer M, et al. Creatine kinase MB, troponin I, and troponin T release patterns after coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass and after aortic and mitral valve surgery. Clin Chem 2001; 47:584-587.
50. Boengler K, Schulz R, Heusch G. Loss of cardioprotection with ageing. Cardiovasc Res 2009; 83:247-261.
51. Hausenloy DJ, Baxter G, Bell R, et al. Translating novel strategies for cardioprotection: the Hatter Workshop Recommendations. Basic Res Cardiol 2010; 105:677-686.
52. Kehl F, Krolikowski JG, Mraovic B, Pagel PS, Warltier DC, Kersten Jr. Hyperglycemia prevents isoflurane-induced preconditioning against myocardial infarction. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:183-188.
53. Tanaka K, Kehl F, Gu W, et al. Isoflurane-induced preconditioning is attenuated by diabetes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002; 282:H2018-H2023.
54. Schwartz Longacre L, Kloner RA, Arai AE, et al. New horizons in cardioprotection: recommendations from the 2010 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop. Circulation 2011; 124:1172-1179.
55. Takagi H, Manabe H, Kawai N, Goto S-N, Umemoto T. Review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials of remote ischemic preconditioning in cardiovascular surgery. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102:1487-1488.
56. Alreja G, Bugano D, Lotfi A. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on myocardial and renal injury: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Invasive Cardiol 2012; 24:42-48.
57. Takagi H, Umemoto T. Remote ischemic preconditioning for cardiovascular surgery: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2011; 45:511-513.
58. Desai M, Gurusamy KS, Ghanbari H, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD008472. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008472.pub2
59. Yetgin T, Manintveld OC, Boersma E, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ J 2012; 27. [Epub ahead of print] doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-12- 0518
60. Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Laing C, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA): rationale and study design of a multicentre randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial. Clin Res Cardiol 2012; 101:339-348.
61. Peters J. Remote ischaemic preconditioning of the heart: remote questions, remote importance, or remote preconditions? Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106:507-509.
62. Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. 'Conditional conditioning' in cardiac bypass surgery. Basic Res Cardiol 2012; 107:258.