Variability of bioaccessibility results using seventeen different methods on a standard reference material, NIST 2710

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 641-655

  Koch, Iris ^a   Reimer, Kenneth J ^a   Bakker, Martine I ^b   Basta, Nicholas T ^c   Cave, Mark R ^d   Denys, Sébastien ^e   Dodd, Matt ^f   Hale, Beverly A ^g   Irwin, Rob ^h   Lowney, Yvette W ⁱ   Moore, Margo M ^j   Paquin, Viviane ^a   Rasmussen, Pat E ^k   Repaso Subang, Theresa ^l   Stephenson, Gladys L ^m   Siciliano, Steven D ⁿ   Wragg, Joanna ^d   Zagury, Gerald J ^o  

^a ROYAL MILITARY COLLEGE OF CANADA   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

^e INERIS   (France)

^f ROYAL ROADS UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^h SGS Canada Inc   (Canada)

ⁱ EXPONENT INC   (United States)

^j SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^k HEALTH CANADA   (Canada)

^l GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD   (Canada)

^m STANTEC CONSULTING LTD   (Canada)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^o ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Bioaccessibility; multiple methods; NIST 2710; variability

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM (AL); BIOACCESSIBILITY; CADMIUMS (CD); EXTRACTION METHOD; INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS; MULTIPLE METHODS; NIST 2710; PHASE-ONLY; RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SOIL SAMPLE; STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL; STUDY DESIGN; VARIABILITY;

BIOCHEMISTRY; LEAD; MANGANESE; SOIL SURVEYS; ZINC;

LABORATORIES;

ALUMINUM; ARSENIC; CADMIUM; CUPROUS ION; LEAD; MANGANESE; ZINC;

BIOAVAILABILITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXTRACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY; PH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOIL;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOIL POLLUTANTS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;

EID: 84874618789     PISSN: 10934529     EISSN: 15324117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2013.731817     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health; In Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999; Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment: Winnipeg, Canada, 1999. Available at http://ceqg-rcqe.ccme. ca/ (accessed March 2012).
2. USEPA. Risk AssessmentGuidance for Superfund,Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Interim Final, EPA/540/1-89/002; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US EPA: Washington, DC, 1989; 1-291.
3. US EPA. Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods, OSWER 9285.7-77; US EPA: Washington, DC, 2007b; 1-54+Appendices.
4. US EPA. Standard Operating Procedure for an In Vitro Bioaccessibility Assay for Lead in Soil, EPA 9200.1-86; US EPA:Washington, DC, 2008; 1-10.
5. Denys, S.; Caboche, J.; Tack, K.; Rychen, G.; Wragg, J., Cave, M.; Jondreville, C.; Feidt, C. In vivo validation of the Unified BARGE Method to assess the bioaccessibility of arsenic, antimony, cadmium, and lead in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 6252-6260.
6. Intawongse,M.; Dean, J.R. In-vitro testing for assessing oral bioaccessibility of trace metals in soil and food samples. Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25(9), 876-886.
7. Koch, I.; Reimer, K.J. Bioaccessibility extractions for contaminant risk assessment. In Comprehensive Sampling and Sample Preparation, J. Pawliszyn, Ed., San Diego: Elsevier, in press, accepted September 2011.
8. Saikat, S.; Barnes, B.; Westwood, D. A review of laboratory results for bioaccessibility values of arsenic, lead and nickel in contaminated UK soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health Pt. A-Tox./Haz. Sub. Environ. Eng. 2007, 42, 1213-1221.
9. Oomen, A.G.; Hack, A.; Minekus, M.; Zeijdner, E.; Cornelis, C.; Schoeters, G.; Verstraete,W.; Van DeWiele, T.;Wragg, J.; Rompelberg, C.J.M.; Sips, A.J.A.M.; Van Wijnen, J.H. Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3326-3334.
10. Van de Wiele, T.R.; Oomen, A.G.; Wragg, J.; Cave, M.; Minekus, M.; Hack, A.; Cornelis, C.; Rompelberg, C.J.M.; De Zwart, L.L.; Klinck, B.; Van Wijnen, J.; Verstraete, W.; Sips, A. J.A.M. Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to in vivo experimental results: Lead bioaccessibility in the human gastrointestinal tract. J. Environ. Sci. Health Pt. A-Tox. Haz. Sub. Environ. Eng. 2007, 42, 1203-1211.
11. Wragg, J.; Cave, M.; Basta, N.; Brandon, E.; Casteel, S.; Denys, S.; Gron, C.; Oomen, A.; Reimer, K.; Tack, K.; Van de Wiele, T. An inter laboratory trial of the unified BARGE bioaccessibilitymethod for arsenic, cadmium and lead in soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 4016-4030.
12. Bioaccessibility Research Canada (BARC). Proceedings of Nov 11-12, 2009Workshop; Environmental Sciences Group, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, 2009; pp 1-55; Available at http://www. bioavailabilityresearch.ca/BARC%20Workshop-%20Proceedings%20Nov11 12%202009.pdf (accessed March 2012).
13. Rasmussen, P.E.; Beauchemin, S.; Nugent, M.; Dugandzic, R.; Lanouette, M.; Ch'enier, M. Influence of matrix composition on the bioaccessibility of copper, zinc, and nickel in urban residential dust and soil. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2008, 14, 359-371.
14. Rasmussen, P.E.; Beauchemin, S.; Ch'enier, M.; Levesque, C.; MacLean, L.C.W.; Marro, L.; Jones-Otazo, H.; Petrovic, S.; Mc-Donald, L.T.; Gardner, H.D. Canadian house dust study: lead bioaccessibility and speciation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 4959-4965.
15. ISO. ISO 5725-2: Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. ISO 5725-2: 1994(E); ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1994; 1-42.
16. Pouchat, P.; Zagury, G.J. In vitro gastrointestinal bioavailability of arsenic in soils collected near CCA-treated utility poles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4317-4323.
17. Girouard, E.; Zagury, G.J. Arsenic bioaccessibility in CCAcontaminated soils: Influence of soil properties, arsenic fractionation, and particle-size fraction. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407(8), 2576-2585.
18. Clark, J.U. Evaluation of censored data methods to allow statistical comparisons among very small samples with below detection limit observations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 177-183.
19. Ellickson, K.M.; Meeker, R.J.; Gallo, M.A.; Buckley, B.T.; Lioy, P.J. Oral boavailability of lead and arsenic from a NIST standard reference soil material. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2001, 40, 128-135.
20. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Certificate of Analysis, Standard Reference Material R - 2710 Montana Soil, Highly Elevated Trace Element Concentrations: NIST: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2003; 1-6.
21. Shock, S.S.; Bessinger, B.A.; Lowney, Y.W.; Clark, J.L. Assessment of the solubility and bioaccessibility of barium and aluminum in soils affected by mine dust deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4813-4820.
22. Turner, A.; Ip, K.-H. Bioaccessibility of metals in dust from the indoor environment: application of a physiologically based extraction test. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 7851-7856.
23. US EPA. Guidance for Evaluating the Oral Bioavailability ofMetals in Soils for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment, OSWER 9285.7-80; US EPA: Washington, DC, 2007a; 1-18.
24. Meunier, L.; Koch, I.; Reimer, K.J. Effects of dissolution kinetics on bioaccessible arsenic from tailings and soils. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 1378-1385.
25. Drexler, J.W.; Brattin, W.J. An in vitro procedure for estimation of lead relative bioavailability: with validation. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 2007, 13, 383-401.
26. Oomen, A.G.; Brandon, E.F.A.; Swartjes, F.A.; Sips,A.J.A.M How can information on oral bioavailability improve human health risk assessment for lead-contaminated soils?, 711701042/2006; RIVM: Bilthoven, Netherlands, 2006; 1-108.
27. Juhasz, A. L.;Weber, J.; Smith, E.; Naidu, R.;Marschner, B.; Rees, M.; Rofe, A.; Kuchel, T.; Sansom, L. Evaluation of SBRC-gastric and SBRC-intestinal methods for the prediction of in vivo relative lead bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4503-4509.
28. Koch, I.; Moriarty,M.; Sui, J.; Gibson, B.;Reimer, K.J. Insolubility of Cr2O3 in bioaccessibility tests points to requirement for a new human oral reference dose for trivalent chromium. Human Ecol. Risk Assess., in press.
29. Bradham, K.D.; Scheckel, K.G.; Nelson, C.M.; Seales, P.E.; Lee, G.E.; Hughes, M. F.; Miller, B.W.; Yeow, A.; Gilmore, T.; Harper, S.; Thomas, D. J. Relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility and speciation of arsenic in contaminated soils. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011,119, 1639-1634.
30. Casteel, S.W.; Weis, C.P.; Henningsen, G.M.; Brattin, W.J. Estimation of relative bioavailability of lead in soil and soil-like materials using young swine. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1162-1171.
31. Schroder, J.L.; Basta,N.T.; Casteel, S.W.; Evans, T.J.; Payton, M.E.; Si, J. Validation of the in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method to estimate relative bioavailable lead in contaminated soils. J. Environ. Qual. 2004, 33, 513-521.
32. Basta, N.T.; Foster, J.N.; Dayton, E.A.; Rodriguez, R.R., Casteel, S.W. The effect of dosing vehicle on arsenic bioaccessibility in smelter-contaminated soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health Pt. A Tox./Haz. Sub. Environ. Eng. 2007, 42, 1275-1281.
33. Juhasz, A.L.; Smith, E.; Weber, J.; Rees, M.; Rofe, A.; Kuchel, T.; Sansom, L.; Naidu, R. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2007, 69, 961-966.
34. Juhasz, A.L.; Weber, J.; Smith, E.; Naidu, R.; Rees, M.; Rofe, A.; Kuchel, T.; Sansom, L. Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 9487-9494.
35. Juhasz, A.L.; Weber, J.; Naidu, R.; Gancarz, D.; Rofe, A.; Todor, D.; Smith, E. Determination of cadmium relative bioavailability in contaminated soils and its prediction using in vitro methodologies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 5240-5247.