What can tubular progenitor cultures teach us about kidney regeneration?

Kidney International

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 351-353

  Romagnani, Paola ^a,b   Anders, Hans Joachim ^c  

^a Transfer and High Education for the Development of De Novo Therapies (DENOTHE)   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CISPLATIN; CYCLIN D1; DECORIN; INHIBIN A; MESSENGER RNA; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR 2;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; APOPTOSIS; CELL PROLIFERATION; HUMAN; IMMUNE SYSTEM; IMMUNOPATHOGENESIS; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY; KIDNEY REGENERATION; KIDNEY TUBULE EPITHELIUM; MEMBRANE RECONSTITUTION; PARACRINE SIGNALING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECRETION; REVIEW; STEM CELL; TISSUE REGENERATION; TUBULAR PROGENITOR CELL; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84874587031     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2012.437     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Till JE, McCulloch EA. A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 1961; 14: 213-222
2. Fuchs E. The impact of cell culture on stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 10: 640-641
3. Mazzinghi B, Ronconi E, Lazzeri E et al. Essential but differential role for CXCR4 and CXCR7 in the therapeutic homing of human renal progenitor cells. J Exp Med 2008; 205: 479-490
4. Angelotti ML, Ronconi E, Ballerini L et al. Characterization of renal progenitors committed toward tubular lineage and their regenerative potential in renal tubular injury. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 1714-1725