E-government adoption in public administration organizations: Integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 221-234

  Zheng, Daqing ^a   Chen, Jin ^b   Huang, Lihua ^c   Zhang, Cheng ^c  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS   (China)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

E government; financial resources; G2G adoption; institutional pressures; IT human resources; top management commitment

Indexed keywords

E-GOVERNMENT; FINANCE; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; PERSONNEL;

E-GOVERNMENT ADOPTIONS; FINANCIAL RESOURCES; G2G ADOPTION; GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNMENTS; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES ANALYSIS; TOP MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT;

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 84874586939     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2012.28     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AFSAR S, MATEEN A and KORBATOV A (2005) Towards the enhancement of electronic democracy: the adoption of reinventing government and electronic government at the municipal level. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences 1(2), 133-137.
2. AKKERMANS H and HELDEN KV (2002) Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success actors. European Journal of Information Systems 11(1), 35-46.
3. ARMSTRONG SJ and OVERTON TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14(3), 396-402.
4. AZJEN I and FISHBEIN M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. BARNEY J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99-120.
6. BOLLEN K and LENNOX R (1991) Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin 110(2), 305-314.
7. BOZEMAN B and KINGSLEY G (1998) Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review 58(2), 109-118.
8. CALDEIRA MM and WARD JM (2003) Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems 12(2), 127-141.
9. CARTER L and BELANDER F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance. Information Systems Journal 15(1), 5-25.
10. CHEN AJ, PAN SL, ZHANG J, HUANG WW and ZHU S (2009) Managing e-government implementation in China: a process perspective. Information & Management 46(4), 203-212.
11. CHEN J, WANG DL and PAN SL (2011) Understanding organizational agility development for government-a process model of resource configuration. In Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (SEDDON PB and GREGOR S, Eds), queensland University of Technology Publication, Brisbane, Australia.
12. CHIN WW (1995) Partial least squares is to LISREL as principle components analysis is to common factor analysis. Technology Studies 2(2), 315-319.
13. CHIN WW (1998a) Issues and opinion on structure equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22(1), vii-xvi.
14. CHIN WW (1998b) The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research (MARCOULIDES GA, Ed), pp 295-336, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
15. CRESSWELL M and CONNELLY DR (1999) Reconnaissance Study: developing a Business Case for the Integration of Criminal Justice Information. Center for Technology in Government, Albany, NY.
16. DAWES S (1996) Interagency information sharing: expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15(3), 377-394.
17. DIMAGGIO PJ and POWELL WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2), 147-160.
18. DOOLEY D (2001) Social Research Methods. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
19. EL-HADDADEH R, WEERAKKODY V, AL-SHAFI SH and ALI M (2010) E-government implementation challenges: a case study. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2010 (SANTANA M, LUFTMAN JN and VINZE AS, Eds), AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Publications, Lima, Peru.
20. FORNELL C and LARCKER DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50.
21. GEFEN D and STRAUB DW (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005(16), 91-109.
22. GIL-GARCIA JR, CHENGALUR-SMITH I and DUCHESSI P (2007) Collaborative e-government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems 16(2), 121-133.
23. HACKNEY R, JONES S and LOSCH A (2007) Towards an e-government efficiency agenda: the impact of information and communication behaviour on e-reverse auctions in public sector procurement. European Journal of Information Systems 16(2), 178-191.
24. HO AT (2002) Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review 62(4), 434-444.
25. HUANG Z (2007) A comprehensive analysis of U.S. counties' e-government portals: development status and functionalities. European Journal of Information Systems 16(2), 149-164.
26. HUANG Z and BWOMA PO (2003) An overview of critical issues of e-government. Issues of Informational Systems 4(1), 27-30.
27. IRANI Z, LOVE PED and MONTAZEMI A (2007) E-government: past, present and future. European Journal of Information Systems 16(2), 103-105.
28. KERNAGHAN K (2003) Integrating values into public service: the values statement as centerpiece. Public Administration Review 63(6), 711-719.
29. LEWIS W, AGARWAL R and SAMBAMUTHY V (2003) Source of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly 27(4), 657-678.
30. LI Y, TAN CH, TEO H and SIOW A (2005) A human capital perspective of organizational intention to adopt open source software. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (AVISON D and GALLETTA D, Eds), Las Vegas, NV.
31. LIANG H, SARAF N, HU Q and XUE Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly 31(3), 59-87.
32. MITCHELL V (2006) Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS Quarterly 30(4), 919-939.
33. MOON MJ and NORRIS DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal 15(1), 43-60.
34. MOORE MH (1995) Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press, London.
35. MOORE MH (2005) Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money & Management 25(1), 43-50.
36. NORTH D (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, New York.
37. OLIVER C (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal 18(9), 697-713.
38. PENROSE E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell, London.
39. PETTER S, STRAUB D and RAI A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 31(4), 623-656.
40. PFEFFER J and SALANCIK GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.
41. PORTER ME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York.
42. RANGANATHAN C, DHALIWAL JS and TEO TSH (2004) Assimilation and diffusion of web technologies in supply-chain management: an examination of key drivers and performance impacts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9(1), 127-161.
43. REALINI AF (2004) G2G e-Government: The big challenge for Europe. Masters Thesis, University of Zurich, Lugano, Switzerland.
44. RINGLE CM, WENDE S and WILL A (2005) SmartPLS (2.0). [WWW document] http://www.smartpls.de (accessed 10 August 2010).
45. SCHACHTER HL (1994) The role of efficiency in bureaucratic study. In Handbook of Bureaucracy (FARAZMAND A, Ed), pp 27-40, Marcel Dekker, New York.
46. SCOTT WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
47. SIMON H (1976) Administrative Behavior. Free Press, New York.
48. STRAUB DW (1989) Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly 13(2), 147-169.
49. TEO HH, WEI KK and BENBASAT I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly 27(1), 19-49.
50. THOMAS JC and STREIB G (2003) The new face of government: citizeninitiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(1), 83-102.
51. TITAH R and BARKI H (2006) E-government adoption and acceptance: a literature review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2(3), 23-57.
52. WADE M and HULLAND J (2004) Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75-105.
53. WATSON RT and MUNDY B (2001) A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Communications of the ACM 44(1), 27-30.
54. WEBER M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Oxford University Press, New York.
55. WILSON JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Basic Books, New York.
56. WIXOM BH and WATSON HJ (2001) An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 17-41.
57. YAO Y and MURPHY L (2007) Remote electronic voting systems: an exploration of voters' perceptions and intention to use. European Journal of Information Systems 16(2), 106-120.
58. ZHANG C and DHALIWAL J (2009) An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics 120(1), 252-269.