Recapture Heterogeneity in Cliff Swallows: Increased Exposure to Mist Nets Leads to Net Avoidance

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Roche, Erin A ^a   Brown, Charles R ^a   Brown, Mary Bomberger ^a   Lear, Kristen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TRAPPING; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BREEDING; CATCHMENT; MARK RECAPTURE; MONITORING; MORPHOLOGY; NESTING; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COLONY; PARAMETERS; PETROCHELIDON PYRRHONOTA; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECAPTURE HETEROGENEITY; SWALLOW (BIRD); ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; TIME; UNITED STATES; WILD ANIMAL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; NEBRASKA; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; SWALLOWS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84874585335     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058092     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Lebreton JD, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR, (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62: 67-118.
2. Gimenez O, Viallefont A, Charmantier A, Pradel R, Cam E, et al. (2008) The risk of flawed inference in evolutionary studies when detectability is less than one. Am Nat 172: 441-448.
3. Tanaka R, (1963) On the problem of trap-response types of small mammal populations. Res Pop Ecol 5: 139-146.
4. Eberhardt LL, (1969) Population estimates from recapture frequencies. J Wildl Manage 33: 28-39.
5. Carothers AD, (1973) Capture-recapture methods applied to a population with known parameters. J Anim Ecol 42: 125-146.
6. Pledger S, Phillpot P, (2008) Using mixtures to model heterogeneity in ecological capture-recapture studies. Biometrical J 50: 1022-1034.
7. Pledger S, Pollock KH, Norris JL, (2003) Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model. Biometrics 59: 786-794.
8. Crespin L, Choquet R, Lima M, Merritt J, Pradel R, (2008) Is heterogeneity of catchability in capture-recapture studies a mere sampling artifact or a biologically relevant feature of the population? Pop Ecol 50: 247-256.
9. Gimenez O, Choquet R, (2010) Individual heterogeneity in studies on marked animals using numerical integration: capture-recapture mixed models. Ecology 91: 951-957.
10. McClintock BR, White GC, Burnham KP, (2006) A robust design mark-resight abundance estimator allowing heterogeneity in resighting probabilities. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 11: 231-248.
11. Karr JR, (1981) Surveying birds with mist nets. Stud Avian Biol 6: 62-67.
12. Tavecchia G, Pradel R, Boy V, Johnson AR, Cézilly F, (2001) Sex- and age-related variation in survival and cost of first reproduction in greater flamingos. Ecology 82: 165-174.
13. Prévot-Julliard AC, Lebreton JD, Pradel R, (1998) Re-evaluation of adult survival of black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus) in presence of recapture heterogeneity. Auk 115: 85-95.
14. Silvy NJ, Robel RJ, (1968) Mist nets and cannon nets compared for capturing prairie chickens on booming grounds. J Wildl Manage 32: 175-178.
15. Senar JC, (1988) Trapping finches with the Yunick platform trap: the residence bias. J Field Ornithol 59: 381-384.
16. Domènech J, Senar JC, (1998) Trap type can bias estimates of sex ratio. J Field Ornithol 69: 380-385.
17. Davis AK, (2005) A comparison of age, size, and health of house finches captured with two trapping methods. J Field Ornithol 76: 339-344.
18. Bonter DN, Brooks EW, Donovan TM, (2008) What are we missing with only ground-level mist nets? Using elevated nets at a migration stopover site. J Field Ornithol 79: 314-320.
19. Williams BL, Holtfreter RW, Ditchkoff SS, Grand JB, (2011) Trap style influences wild pig behavior and trapping success. J Wildl Manage 75: 432-436.
20. Smout S, King R, Pomeroy P, (2011) Integrating heterogeneity of detection and mark loss to estimate survival and transience in UK grey seal colonies. J Appl Ecol 48: 364-372.
21. Boulinier T, Nichols JD, Sauer JR, Hines JE, Pollock KH, (1998) Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79: 1018-1028.
22. Hein EW, Myers OB, (2000) The effect of surveyor experience on frequency of recapture in pierid butterflies. Southwest Nat 45: 67-69.
23. Harris MP, Freeman SN, Wanless S, Morgan BJT, Wernham CV, (1997) Factors influencing the survival of puffins Fratercula arctica at a North Sea colony over 20-year period. J Avian Biol 28: 287-295.
24. Drickamer LC, Feldhamer GA, Mikesic DG, Holmes CM, (1999) Trap-response heterogeneity of house mice (Mus musculus) in outdoor enclosures. J Mammal 80: 410-420.
25. Tuyttens FAM, MacDonald DW, Delahay R, Rogers LM, Mallinson PJ, et al. (1999) Differences in trapability of European badgers Meles meles in three populations in England. J Appl Ecol 36: 1051-1062.
26. Whitehead H, (2001) Direct estimation of within-group heterogeneity in photo-identification of sperm whales. Marine Mammal Sci 17: 718-728.
27. Gehrt SD, Fritzell EK, (1996) Sex-biased response of raccoons (Procyon lotor) to live traps. Am Midl Nat 135: 23-32.
28. Ogutu JO, Piepho HP, Dublin HT, Reid RS, Bhola N, (2004) Application of mark-recapture methods to lions: satisfying assumptions by using covariates to explain heterogeneity. J Zool 269: 161-174.
29. Summerlin CT, Wolfe JL, (1973) Social influences on trap response of the cotton rat, Sigmodon hispidus. Ecology 54: 1156-1159.
30. Fearnbach H, Durban J, Parsons K, Claridge D, (2012) Photographic mark-recapture analysis of local dynamics within an open population of dolphins. Ecol Appl 22: 1689-1700.
31. Deslauriers JV, Francis CM, (1991) The effect of time of day on mist-net captures of passerines on spring migration. J Field Ornithol 62: 107-116.
32. Davis SA, Akison LK, Farrowy LN, Singleton GR, Leslie KE, (2003) Abundance estimators and truth: accounting for individual heterogeneity in wild house mice. J Wildl Manage 67: 634-645.
33. Zabel RW, Wagner T, Congleton JL, Smith SG, Williams JG, (2005) Survival and selection of migrating salmon from capture-recapture models with individual traits. Ecol Appl 15: 1427-1439.
34. Dieter CD, Murano RJ, Galster D, (2009) Capture and mortality rates of ducks in selected trap types. J Wildl Manage 73: 1223-1228.
35. Koons DN, Birkhead RD, Boback SM, Williams MI, Greene MP, (2009) The effect of body size on cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) survival, recapture probability, and behavior in an Alabama swamp. Herpetol Conserv Biol 4: 221-235.
36. Bradford A, Wade PR, Weller D, Burdin AM, Ivashchenko YV, et al. (2006) Survival estimates of western gray whales Eschrichtius robustus incorporating individual heterogeneity and temporary emigration. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 315: 293-307.
37. Cooper CB, Daniels SJ, Walters JR, (2008) Can we improve estimates of juvenile dispersal distance and survival? Ecology 89: 3349-3361.
38. Gilroy JJ, Virzi T, Boulton RL, Lockwood JL, (2012) A new approach to the "apparent survival" problem: estimating true survival rates from mark-recapture studies. Ecology 93: 1509-1516.
39. Jensen TS, (1975) Trappability of various functional groups of the forest rodents Clethrionomys glareoulus and Apodemus flavicollis, and its application in density estimations. Oikos 26: 196-204.
40. Nur N, Geupel GR, Ballard G, (2004) Estimates of adult survival, capture probability, and recapture probability: evaluating and validating constant-effort mist-netting. Stud Avian Biol 29: 63-70.
41. Grosbois V, Thompson PM, (2005) North Atlantic climate variation influences survival in adult fulmars. Oikos 109: 273-290.
42. Biro PA, Dingemanse NJ, (2009) Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 66-67.
43. Cubaynes S, Lavergne C, Marboutin E, Gimenez O, (2012) Assessing individual heterogeneity using model selection criteria: how many mixture components in capture-recapture models? Methods Ecol Evol 3: 564-573.
44. Fletcher D, Lebreton JD, Marescot L, Schaub M, Gimenez O, et al. (2012) Bias in estimation of adult survival and asymptotic population growth rate caused by undetected capture heterogeneity. Methods Ecol Evol 3: 206-216.
45. Nichols JD, Hines JE, Pollock KH, (1984) Effects of permanent trap response in capture probability on Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model estimates. J Wildl Manage 48: 289-294.
46. Devineau O, Choquet R, Lebreton JD, (2006) Planning capture-recapture studies: straightforward precision, bias, and power calculations. Wildl Soc Bull 34: 1028-1035.
47. Cubaynes S, Pradel R, Choquet R, Duchamp C, Gaillard JM, et al. (2010) Importance of accounting for detection heterogeneity when estimating abundance: the case of French wolves. Conserv Biol 24: 621-626.
48. Hines JE, Nichols JD, (2002) Investigations of potential bias in the estimation of λ using Pradel's (1996) model for capture-recapture data. J Appl Stati 29: 573-587.
49. Link WA, (2003) Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities. Biometrics 59: 1123-1130.
50. Silveira L, Jácomo ATA, Diniz-Filho JAF, (2003) Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biol Conserv 114: 351-355.
51. Faaborg J, Dugger KM, Arendt WJ, (2007) Long-term variation in the winter resident bird community of Guánica forest, Puerto Rico: lessons for measuring and monitoring species richness. J Field Ornithol 78: 270-278.
52. Anthony NM, Ribic CA, Bautz R, Garland T, (2005) Comparative effectiveness of Longworth and Sherman live traps. Wildl Soc Bull 33: 1018-1026.
53. Brownie C, Robson DS, (1983) Estimation of time-specific survival rates from tag-resighting samples: a generalization of the Jolly-Seber model. Biometrics 39: 437-453.
54. Brown MB, Brown CR, (2009) Blood sampling reduces annual survival in cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). Auk 126: 853-861.
55. Møller AP, de Lope F, (1999) Senescence in a short-lived migratory bird: age-dependent morphology, migration, reproduction and parasitism. J Anim Ecol 68: 163-171.
56. Péron G, Crochet PA, Choquet R, Pradel R, Lebreton JD, et al. (2010) Capture-recapture models with heterogeneity to study survival senescence in the wild. Oikos 119: 524-532.
57. Pradel R, Hines JE, Lebreton JD, Nichols JD, (1997) Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53: 60-72.
58. Marten GG, (1970) A regression method for mark-recapture estimation of population size with unequal catchability. Ecology 51: 291-295.
59. Pradel R (1993) Flexibility in survival analysis from recapture data: handling trap-dependence. In Lebreton JD, North PM, eds. Marked individuals in the study of bird population. Basel (Switzerland): Birkhaiuser Verlag, 29-37.
60. Burnham KP, Overton WS, (1978) Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65: 625-633.
61. Chao A, (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43: 783-791.
62. Agresti A, (1994) Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort. Biometrics 50: 494-500.
63. Chao A, Chu W, Hsu CH, (2000) Capture-recapture when time and behavioral response affect capture probabilities. Biometrics 56: 427-433.
64. Huggins R, (2001) A note on the difficulties associated with the analysis of capture-recapture experiments with heterogeneous capture probabilities. Stat Prob Lett 54: 147-152.
65. Royle JA, (2008) Modeling individual effects in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model: a state-space formulation. Biometrics 64: 364-370.
66. Calvert AM, Bonner SJ, Jonsen ID, Flemming JM, Walde SJ, et al. (2009) A hierarchical Bayesian approach to multi-state mark-recapture: simulations and applications. J Appl Ecol 46: 610-620.
67. Brown CR, Brown MB (1996) Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68. Brown CR, Brown MB, (2004) Group size and ectoparasitism affect daily survival probability in a colonial bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 221-228.
69. Brown CR, Brown MB, Moore AT, Komar N, (2007) Bird movement predicts Buggy Creek virus infection in insect vectors. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 7: 304-314.
70. Brown CR, Brown MB, Brazeal KR, (2008) Familiarity with breeding habitat improves daily survival in colonial cliff swallows. Anim Behav 76: 1201-1210.
71. Bollinger EK, Linder ET, (1994) Reproductive success of neotropical migrants in a fragmented Illinois forest. Wilson Bull 106: 46-64.
72. De Sante DF, Burton KM, Saracco JF, Walker BL, (1995) Productivity indices and survival rate estimates from MAPS, a continent-wide programme of constant-effort mist-netting in North America. J Appl Stat 22: 935-947.
73. Peach WJ, Buckland ST, Baillie SR, (1996) The use of constant effort mist-netting to measure between-year changes in the abundance and productivity of common passerines. Bird Study 43: 142-156.
74. Gardali T, Ballard G, Nur N, Geupel GR, (2000) Demography of a declining population of warbling vireos in coastal California. Condor 102: 601-609.
75. Dunn EH, Hussell DJT, Adams RJ, (2004) An investigation of productivity indices derived from banding of fall migrants. Stud Avian Biol 29: 92-96.
76. MacArthur RH, MacArthur AT, (1974) On the use of mist nets for population studies of birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71: 320-3233.
77. Remsen JV Jr, Good DA, (1996) Misuse of data from mist-net captures to assess relative abundance in bird populations. Auk 113: 381-398.
78. Brown CR, Brown MB (1995) Cliff swallow (Hirundo pyrrhonota). In Poole A, Gill F, eds. The birds of North America. Philadelphia, PA: Academy of Natural Sciences, and Washington DC: American Ornithologists' Union, no.149.
79. Brown CR (1998) Swallow summer. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
80. White GC, Burnham KP, (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: S120-S139.
81. Laake J, Rakimberdiev E, Collier B, Rotella J, Paul A (2012) RMark: R Code for MARK Analysis. R package version 2.1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RMark.
82. Afshartous D, Preston RA, (2010) Confidence intervals for dependent data: equating non-overlap with statistical significance. Comput Stat Data An 54: 2296-2305.
83. Roche EA, Brown CR, Brown MB, (2011) Heritable choice of colony size in cliff swallows: does experience trump genetics in older birds? Anim Behav 82: 1275-1285.
84. Choquet R, Lebreton JD, Gimenez O, Reboulet AM, Pradel R, (2009) U-CARE: utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating capture-recapture data. Ecography 32: 1071-1074.
85. Brown CR, Brown MB, Raouf SA, Smith LC, Wingfield JC, (2005) Effects of endogenous steroid hormone levels on annual survival in cliff swallows. Ecology 86: 1034-1046.
86. Burnham KP, White GC, (2002) Evaluation of some random effects methodology applicable to bird ringing data. J Appl Stat 29: 245-264.
87. Salewski V, Thoma M, Schaub M, (2007) Stopover of migrating birds: simultaneous analysis of different marking methods enhances the power of capture-recapture analyses. J Ornithol 148: 29-37.
88. Jennings S, Gardali T, Seavy NE, Geupel GR, (2009) Effects of mist netting on reproductive performance of wrentits and song sparrows in central coastal California. Condor 111: 488-496.
89. Spotswood EN, Goodman KR, Carlisle J, Cormier RL, Humple DL, et al. (2012) How safe is mist netting? Evaluating the risk of injury and mortality to birds. Methods Ecol Evol 3: 29-38.
90. Lefebvre L, Palameta B, Hatch KK, (1996) Is group-living associated with social learning? A comparative test of a gregarious and a territorial columbid. Behaviour 133: 241-261.
91. Seppanen JT, Forsman JT, (2007) Interspecific social learning: novel preference can be acquired from a competing species. Current Biol 17: 1248-1252.
92. Brown CR, Brown MB, Danchin E, (2000) Breeding habitat selection in cliff swallows: the effect of conspecific reproductive success on colony choice. J Anim Ecol 69: 133-142.
93. Bart J, Kepler C, Sykes P, Bocetti C, (1999) Evaluation of mist-net sampling as an index to productivity in Kirtland's warblers. Auk 116: 1147-1151.
94. Pradel R, Johnson AR, Viallefont A, Nager RG, Cézilly F, (1997) Local recruitment in the greater flamingo: a new approach using capture-mark-recapture data. Ecology 78: 1431-1445.
95. Altwegg R, Schaub M, Roulin A, (2007) Age-specific fitness components and their temporal variation in the barn owl. Am Nat 169: 47-61.
96. Roche EA, Cuthbert FJ, Arnold TW, (2008) Relative fitness of wild and captive-reared piping plovers: does egg salvage contribute to recovery of the endangered Great Lakes population? Biol Conserv 141: 3079-3088.
97. Lee DE, Abraham CL, Warzybok PM, Bradley RW, Sydeman WJ, (2008) Age-specific survival, breeding success, and recruitment in common murres (Uria aalge) of the California current system. Auk 125: 316-325.
98. Brown CR, Brown MB, Raouf SA, Smith LC, Wingfield JC, (2005) Steroid hormone levels are related to choice of colony size in cliff swallows. Ecology 86: 2904-2915.
99. Powell LA, (2007) Approximating variance of demographic parameters using the delta method: a reference for avian biologists. Condor 109: 949-954.