Characterization of Optical System for Hemodynamic Multi-Parameter Assessment

Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 87-97

  Pereira, Tânia ^a   Santos, Inês ^a   Oliveira, Tatiana ^a   Vaz, Pedro ^a   Correia, Tobias ^a   Pereira, Telmo ^b   Santos, Helder ^b   Pereira, Helena ^a,c   Almeida, Vânia ^a   Cardoso, João ^a   Correia, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b Coimbra College of Health Technology ^*  (Portugal)

^c ISA Intelligent Sensing Anywhere   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular risk factors; Hemodynamics parameters; Optical probes; Pulse wave velocity; Pulse waveform analysis

Indexed keywords

CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIO-VASCULAR RISK FACTORS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL FEASIBILITY; COMMERCIAL DEVICES; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPARAMETERS; NON-CONTACT; NON-INVASIVE MONITORING; OPTICAL PROBE; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE WAVE VELOCITY; PULSE-WAVEFORM ANALYSIS; TIME INDEX; WAVEFORM CHARACTERISTICS;

ACOUSTIC WAVE VELOCITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBES; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

OPTICAL SYSTEMS;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUGMENTATION INDEX; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CAROTID ARTERY PULSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EJECTION TIME INDEX; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL PROBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSOR; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SUBENDOCARDIAL VIABILITY RATIO; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 84874581628     PISSN: 1869408X     EISSN: 18694098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13239-013-0125-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Avolio, A. P., M. Butlin, and A. Walsh. Arterial blood pressure measurement and pulse wave analysis-their role in enhancing cardiovascular assessment. Physiol. Meas. 31(1): R1-R47, 2010.
2. Blacher, J., R. Asmar, S. Djane, G. M. London, and M. E. Safar. Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 33(5): 1111-1117, 1999.
3. Boutouyrie, P., M. Briet, S. Vermeersch, and B. Pannier. Assessment of pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 3(3-8): 2009, 2009.
4. Boutouyrie, P., et al. Common carotid artery stiffness and patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 25(4): 651-659, 1995.
5. Chemla, D., et al. Subendocardial viability ratio estimated by arterial tonometry: a critical evaluation in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 35(8): 909-915, 2008.
6. Crilly, M., C. Coch, M. Bruce, H. Clark, and D. Williams. Indices of cardiovascular function derived from peripheral pulse wave analysis using radial applanation tonometry: a measurement repeatability study. Vasc. Med. (London, England) 12(3): 189-197, 2007.
7. Hermeling, E., et al. Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness should discriminate between systolic and diastolic pressure ranges. Hypertension 55(1): 124-130, 2010.
8. Istratoaie, O., R. Mustafa, and I. Donoiu. Central aortic pressure estimated by radial applanation tonometry in hypertensive pulmonary oedema. J. Hypertens. 28, 2010.
9. Kara, S., M. Okandan, G. Usta, and T. Tezcaner. Investigation of a new heart contractility power parameter. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 76(2): 177-180, 2004.
10. Kelly, R., and D. Fitchett. Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 20(4): 952-963, 1992.
11. Korpas, D., J. Hálek, and L. Dolezal. Parameters describing the pulse wave. Physiol. Res. 58(4): 473-479, 2009.
12. Laine, G. A. Change in (dP/dt)max as an index of myocardial micravascular permeability. Circ. Res. 61: 203-208, 1987.
13. Lamia, B., D. Chemla, C. Richard, and J.-L. Teboul. Clinical review: interpretation of arterial pressure wave in shock states. Crit. Care (London, England) 9(6): 601-606, 2005.
14. Millasseau, S. C., A. D. Stewart, S. J. Patel, S. R. Redwood, and P. J. Chowienczyk. Evaluation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: influence of timing algorithm and heart rate. Hypertension 45(2): 222-226, 2005.
15. Miller, R. S., C. B. Rudra, and M. A Williams. First-trimester mean arterial pressure and risk of preeclampsia. Am. J. Hypertens. 20(5): 573-578, 2007.
16. Nagasaki, T., et al. Clinical utility of heart-carotid pulse wave velocity in healthy Japanese subjects. Biomed. Aging Pathol. 1(2): 107-111, 2011.
17. Nelson, M. R., J. Stepanek, M. Cevette, M. Covalciuc, R. T. Hurst, and J. Tajik. Noninvasive measurement of central vascular pressures with arterial tonometry: clinical revival of the pulse pressure waveform? Mayo Clin. Proc. 85(5): 460-472, 2010.
18. Payne, R. A., R. C. Hilling-Smith, D. J. Webb, S. R. Maxwell, and M. A. Denvir. Augmentation index assessed by applanation tonometry is elevated in Marfan Syndrome. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2: 43, 2007.
19. Pereira, T., et al. Non-contact Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment. Berlin: Springer, 2012 (BIOSTEC 2011, CCIS 273, no. 2, pp. 246-257, 2012).
20. Pereira, T., M. Cabeleira, P. Matos, E. Borges, J. Cardoso, and C. Correia. Optical methods for local pulse wave velocity assessment. In: 4th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, Rome, Italy, pp. 74-81, 2011.
21. Pereira, T., et al. Signal analysis in a new optical pulse waveform profiler for cardiovascular applications. Signal and Image Processing and Applications/716: Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, no. Sipa, pp. 19-25, 2011.
22. Rabben, S. I., et al. An ultrasound-based method for determining pulse wave velocity in superficial arteries. J. Biomech. 37(10): 1615-1622, 2004.
23. Safar, M. E. Arterial stiffness: a simplified overview in vascular medicine. Atheroscler. Large Arter. Cardiovasc. Risk 44: 1-18, 2007.
24. Sharman, J. E., J. E. Davies, C. Jenkins, and T. H. Marwick. Augmentation index, left ventricular contractility, and wave reflection. Hypertension 54(5): 1099-1105, 2009.
25. Siebenhofer, A., C. Kemp, A. Sutton, and B. Williams. The reproducibility of central aortic blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects using applanation tonometry and sphygmocardiography. J. Hum. Hypertens. 13(9): 625-629, 1999.
26. Sørensen G. L., J. B. Jensen, J. Udesen, and I. K. Holfort. Pulse Wave velocity in the carotid artery. 1(1): 1386-1389, 2008.
27. Tsiachris, D., et al. Subendocardial viability ratio as an index of impaired coronary flow reserve in hypertensives without significant coronary artery stenoses. J. Hum. Hypertens. 26(1): 64-70, 2012.
28. Vermeersch, S. J., B. Dynamics, and L. Society. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'. Eur. Heart J. 31(19): 2338-2350, 2010.
29. Weissler, A. M., W. S. Harris, and D. Clyde. Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation 37: 149-159, 1968.
30. Weissler, A. M., R. G. Peeler, and W. H. Roehll, Jr. Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease. Am. Heart J. 62(3): 367-378, 1961.
31. Wilkinson, I. B., H. MacCallum, L. Flint, J. R. Cockcroft, D. E. Newby, and D. J. Webb. The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J. Physiol. 525(Pt 1): 263-270, 2000.