The relationship of area-level sociodemographic characteristics, household composition and individual-level socioeconomic status on walking behavior among adults

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 50, Issue , 2013, Pages 149-157

  Hearst, Mary O ^a   Sirard, John R ^b   Forsyth, Ann ^c   Parker, Emily D ^d   Klein, Elizabeth G ^e   Green, Christine G ^f   Lytle, Leslie A ^g  

^a ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HEALTHPARTNERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f USA   (United States)

^g University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Active transportation; Adult; Area deprivation; Policy; Socioeconomic status; Walking

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; TRANSPORTATION;

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATIONS; ADULT; AREA DEPRIVATION; SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS; WALKING;

LEISURE;

ADULT; CORRELATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; WALKING;

EID: 84874576788     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agrawal A., Schimek P. Extent and correlates of walking in the USA. Transportation Research Part D 2007, 12:548-563.
2. Berrigan D., Troiano R.P., et al. Active transportation increases adherence to activity recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2006, 31(3):210-216.
3. Besser L.M., Dannenberg A.L. Walking to public transit: steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 29(4):273-280.
4. Blanco H., Alberti M., et al. Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning 2009, 71(4):153-205.
5. Bodea T., Garrow L., et al. Socio-demographic and built environment influences on the odds of being overweight or obese: the Atlanta experience. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2009, 44(7):523-536.
6. Butler G., Orpana H., et al. By your own two feet. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2007, 98(4):259-264.
7. Cao X., Mokhtarian P., et al. The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: a case study of Northern California. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2009, 43(5):548-559.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (December 17, 2008). (retrieved 05.08.09). http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/guidelines/adults.html.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008, August 5. Physical Activity and Health: The Benefits of Physical Activity. (retrieved 05.08.09). http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/health/index.html.
10. Cerin E., Leslie E. How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. Social Science and Medicine 2008, 66(12):2596-2609.
11. Cerin E., Leslie E., et al. Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors. Social Science and Medicine 2009, 68(6):1013-1020.
12. Craig C.L., Marshall A.L., et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003, 35(8):1381-1395.
13. Craig C.L., Marshall A.L., et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003, 35(8):1381-1395.
14. Crane R. Is there a quiet revolution in women's travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association 2007, 73(3):298-316.
15. Department of Agriculture, 2009. School Meals: Income Eligibility Guidelines. http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Governance/notices/iegs/IEGs.htm.
16. DeVellis R. Scale Development: Theory and Application 2003, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
17. Eyler A.A., Brownson R.C., et al. The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003, 35(9):1529-1536.
18. Flegal K.M., Carroll M.D., et al. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA 2012, 307(5):491-497.
19. Forsyth A., Oakes J., et al. Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity. Urban Studies 2007, 44(4):679-697.
20. Forsyth A., Hearst M., et al. Design and destinations: factors influencing walking and total physical activity. Urban Studies 2008, 45(9):1973-1996.
21. Forsyth A., Krizek K., et al. Non-motorised travel research and contemporary planning initiatives. Progress in Planning 2009, 71:153-205.
22. Forsyth A., Oakes J.M., et al. The built environment, walking, and physical activity: is the environment more important to some people than others?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2009, 14(1):42-49.
23. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Core Group. Guidelines for the data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short and long form. 2005 Accessed 2011; Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol.
24. Ionnides Y. Neighborhood income distributions. Journal of Urban Economics 2004, 56:435-457.
25. Kruger J., Ham S.A., et al. Prevalence of transportation and leisure walking among U.S. adults. Preventive Medicine 2008, 47(3):329-334.
26. Lee Y., Hickman M., et al. Household type and structure, time-use pattern, and trip-chaining behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2007, 41:1004-1020.
27. Lytle L.A. Examining the etiology of childhood obesity: the IDEA study. American Journal of Community Psychology 2009, 44(3-4):338-349.
28. Maat K., Timmermans H. Influence of the residential and work environment on car use in dual-earner households. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2009, 43:654-664.
29. Macintyre S., Ellaway A., et al. Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them?. Social Science and Medicine 2002, 55(1):125-139.
30. Meriwether R.A., McMahon P.M., et al. Physical activity assessment: validation of a clinical assessment tool. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2006, 31(6):484-491.
31. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Review, 2008. Prevalence of self-reported physically active adults - United States, 2007. 57(48), 1297-1300.
32. Murray D. Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials 1998, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
33. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, 1998. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Obesity Eduction Initiative. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health.
34. Oakes J.M. The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Social Science and Medicine 2004, 58(10):1929-1952.
35. Saelens B.E., Handy S.L. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2008, 40(7 Suppl):S550-66.
36. Saelens B.E., Sallis J.F., et al. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2003, 25(2):80-91.
37. SAS Institute Inc., 2002-2003. SAS/STAT. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
38. Singh G.K. Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969-1998. American Journal of Public Health 2003, 93(7):1137-1143.
39. National Center for Education Statistics, 2010. State Data Profiles, Minnesota.
40. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. (retrieved 18.11.08).
41. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2012, 2/9/12. 2012 HHS Poverty Guidelines. (retrieved 10.08.12). http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/12poverty.shtml/#thresholds.
42. Wells N.M., Yang Y. Neighborhood design and walking. A quasi-experimental longitudinal study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 34(4):313-319.
43. Widome R., Forster J.L., et al. Longitudinal patterns of youth access to cigarettes and smoking progression: Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) study (2000-2003). Preventive Medicine 2007, 45(6):442-446.
44. Wolin K.Y., Heil D.P., et al. Validation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short among blacks. J Phys Act Health 2008, 5(5):746-760.