The tensions over liberal citizenship in a Marxist revolutionary situation: The Maoists in India

Critique of Anthropology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 91-109

  Shah, Alpa ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adivasi; Citizenship; civil liberties; human rights; India; indigenous people; Maoists; Naxalites; radical left politics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874546120     PISSN: 0308275X     EISSN: 14603721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0308275X12466679     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barry NCitizenship and Rights in Thatcher's Britain. Two Views. Plant RBarry N, ed. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit; 1990:.
2. Buchanan AMarx and Justice: The Radical Critique of Liberalism. London: Rowman and Littlefield; 1982:.
3. Bhattacharya A (2010) Is Lalgarh showing the way? Economic and political weekly. 9th January 2010.
4. Chatterjee PNationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. London: Zed; 1986:.
5. Chatterjee PThe Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993:.
6. Clastres PSociety Against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology. New York: Zone Books; 1974:.
7. Collier JF,Bill M,Suarez-Navaz L.Sanctioned identities: legal constructions of modern personhood.Identities. 1997;2 (1-2): 1-27.
8. Fuller C,Harris JThe Everyday State and Society in Modern India. Fuller CBenei V, ed. London: Hurst, pp. 1-30; 2001:.
9. Galanter MCompeting Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984:.
10. Government of India (2008) Development challenges in extremist affected areas. Report of an Expert Group to Planning Commission.
11. Giri S.The Maoist "problem" and the democratic left in India.Journal of Contemporary Asia. 2009;39 (3): 463-474.
12. Gudavarthy A.Human rights movement in India: state, civil society and beyond.Contributions to Indian Sociology. 2008;42 (49): 29-57.
13. Guha R.Scientific forestry and social change in Uttarakhand.Economic and Political Weekly. 1985;20 (45/47): 1939-1952.
14. Guha RElementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India (1983). Durham: Duke University Press; 1999:.
15. Holston JInsurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008:.
16. War in the Heart of India: An Enquiry into the Ground Situation in Dantewada District, Chhattisgarh. New Delhi: Independent Citizens Initiative; 2006:.
17. Jaoul N (2010) Anand Teltumbde: Kairllangi. A Strange and Bitter Crop. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal. Available at: http://samaj.revues.org/index2937.html.
18. Jaoul N and Desquesnes N (2012). India's Naxalite showdown. Le Monde Diplomatique, January 2012, pp. 10-11.
19. Kaviraj S.On the crisis of political institutions in India.Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.). 1984;18 (2): 223-243.
20. Kaviraj SRethinking Third World Politics. Manor J, ed. Harlow: Longman; 1991:72-99.
21. Kaviraj SDynamics of State Formation: India and Europe Compared. Doornbos MKaviraj S, ed. Delhi: Sage; 1997:225-250.
22. Kunnath GJRebels from the Mud Houses: Dalits and the Making of the Maoist Revolution in Bihar. Delhi: Social Science Press; 2012:.
23. Mamdani MCitizens and Subjects: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996:.
24. Marshall THClass, Ethnicity and Social Development. New York: Anchor; 1965:.
25. Marx K (1844) On the Jewish question. Available at: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/ (accessed 27 November 2010).
26. Mead LBeyond Entitlement: The Social Obligation of Citizenship. London: Trentham; 1986:.
27. Navlakha G (2010) Days and nights in the Maoist heartland. Economic and Political Weekly, Volume 45, No. 16, 17-23 April 2010.
28. When the State Makes War on Its Own People: A Report on the Violation of People's Rights During the Salwa Judum Campaign in Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. New Delhi: People's Union of Democratic Rights; 2006:.
29. Ravi N.Democratic rights and dialectics.Economic and Political Weekly. 1993;18 (32): 3409-3415.
30. Roy A (2010) Walking with the comrades: Gandhians with a gun? Outlook. 29 March 2010. Available at: http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264738.
31. Scott JThe Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2009:.
32. Shah A.Keeping the state away: democracy, politics and the state in India's Jharkhand.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2007;13 (1): 129-145.
33. Shah AIn the Shadows of the State: Indigenous Politics, Environmentalism and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Durham: Duke University Press; 2010:.
34. Shah A (forthcoming) The Agrarian question in a Maoist Guerrilla zone: land, labour and capital in the forests and hills of Jharkhand, India. Under Review at Journal of Agrarian Change.
35. Shah A (2011) The intimacy of insurgency. British Academy Oxford Poverty Conference, Oxford.
36. Shah A.Eco-incarceration: 'Walking with the comrades'.Economic and Political Weekly. 2012a;XLVII (21): 32-34.
37. Shah A (2012b) The muck of the past: revolution, social transformation and the Maoists in India. The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 17 May 2012, LSE.
38. Shani O.Conceptions of citizenship in India and the 'Muslim question'.Modern Asian Studies. 2010;44 (1): 145-173.
39. Singh KSBirsa Munda: A Centennial Edition (1966). Calcutta: Seagull Press; 2002:.
40. Singh UK.Democratising state and society: role of civil liberties and democratic rights movements in India.Contemporary India. 2005;4 (1-2): 31-56.
41. Stoll DBetween Two Armies in the Ixil Towns of Guatemala. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993:.
42. Subramanian AShorelines: Space and Rights in South India. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2009:.
43. Teltumbde AKairlangi. A Strange and Bitter Crop. New Delhi: Navayana; 2008:.
44. Vanden HE.Mariategui: Marxismo, Communismo, and other bibliographic notes.Latin American Research Review. 1979;14 (3): 61-86.
45. Young IM.Polity and group difference. A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship.Ethics. 1989;99:250-274.