Effect of UDP traffic on TCP's round-trip delay

Tongxin Xuebao/Journal on Communications

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 19-29

  Zhu, Hai Ting ^a   Ding, Wei ^a   Miao, Li Hua ^a   Gong, Jian ^a  

^a SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Network fairness; Round trip time; TCP performance; UDP traffic model

Indexed keywords

BIDIRECTIONAL NETWORKS; FITTING METHOD; HIGH CONFIDENCE; LINK BANDWIDTH; MEAN VALUES; NETWORK FAIRNESS; PASSIVE MEASUREMENTS; ROUND TRIP DELAY; ROUND-TRIP TIME; TCP PERFORMANCE; TCP TRANSMISSION; UDP TRAFFIC;

BANDWIDTH; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; RANDOM PROCESSES;

TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

EID: 84874514915     PISSN: 1000436X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-436x.2013.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. RFC 5348: TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification [S].
2. RFC 5622: Profile for DCCP Congestion Control ID 4: TCP-Friendly Rate Control for Small Packets (TFRC-SP) [S].
3. http://iptas.edu.cn, 2011 [EB/OL].
4. http://www.caida.org/research/traffic-analysis/tcpudpratio/, 2010 [EB/OL].
5. LEE D, CARPENTER B E, BROWNLEE N. Observations of UDP to TCP ratio and port numbers [A]. Proc Int Conf on Internet Monitoring and Protection (ICIMP) [C]. 2010.
6. AKHSHABI S, DOVROLIS C. The evolution of layered protocol stacks leads to an hourglass-shaped architecture [A]. SIGCCOM'11 [C]. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2011.
7. ZHANG Y B, ZHANG Z B, ZHAO Y, et al. Comparative analysis on TCP and UDP network traffic [J]. Application Research of Computers, 2010, 27(6): 2192-2197.
8. WANG G, DING W, DONG S. Classification of UDP traffic from P2P applications [A]. ICON2011, the 17th IEEE International Conference on Network [C]. Singapore, 2011. 252-257.
9. LIN D, MORRIS R. Dynam ICS of random early detection [A]. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 1997 [C]. Cannes, France, 1997. 127-137.
10. FENG W, KANDLUR D, SAHA D, et al. Stochastic fair blue: a queue management algorithm for enforcing fairness [A]. Proc IEEE INFOCOM 2001 [C]. Anchorage, Alaska, 2001. 1520-1529.
11. PAN R, PRABHAKAR B, PSOUNIS K. CHOKe: a stateless active queue management scheme for approximating fair bandwidth allocation [A]. Proc of IEEE INFOCOM 2000 [C]. Tel Aviv, Israel, 2000. 942-951.
12. PADHYE J, FIROIU V, TOWSLEY D, et al. Modeling TCP Throughput: a Simple Model and Its Empirical Validation [R]. UMASS-CS-TR-1998-08.
13. FLOYD S, FALL K. Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the internet [J]. IEEE/ ACM Transactions on Networking, 1999, 7(4): 458-472.
14. LA R J, RANJAN P, ABED E H. Nonlinear dynamics of mixed TCP and UDP traffic under RED [A]. Proc of SIGCOMM [C]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2002.
15. CHIU D M, TAM A S W. Network fairness for heterogeneous applications [A]. Proc of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Asia Workshop [C]. Beijing, China, 2005.
16. KELLY P, MAULLOO A K, TAN D K H. Rate control in communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1998, (49): 237-252.
17. FAN H, LI L, YUAN J, et al. Langevin model of the flow control in the internet and its phase transition analysis [J]. Acta Phys Sin, 2009, 58(11): 7507-7513.
18. RAI I A, ABDUL S. Towards end-host-based identification of competing protocols against TCP in a bottleneck link [A]. Annals of Telecommunications [C]. 2011. 59-77.
19. QIAN F, GERBER A, MAO Z M, et al. TCP revisited: a fresh look at TCP in the wild [A]. IMC'09 [C]. Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2009.
20. MAHAJAN R, FLOYD S, WETHERALL D. Controlling High Bandwidth Flows at the Congested Router [R]. T R-01-001. AT & T Center for Internet Research at ICSI (ACIRI), 2001.
21. JIANG Y, HAMDI M, LIU J. Self adjustable CHOKe: an active queue management algorithm for congestion control and fair bandwidth allocation [A]. Proc ISCC 03 [C]. 2003. 1018-1025.
22. CHATRANON G, LABRADOR M A, BANERJEE S. BLACK: detection and preferential dropping of high bandwidth unresponsive flows [A]. Proc of ICC 03 [C]. 2003. 664-668.
23. TANG D Y, LUO J W, ZHANG D F, et al. Active queue management improving the stability and fairness [J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2005, 42(7): 1136-1142.
24. HO C Y, CHAN Y C, CHEN Y C. A TCP-friendly stateless AQM scheme for fair bandwidth allocation [A]. Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous System and International Conference on Networking and Services (ICAS/ICNS 2005) [C]. 2005. 14-19.
25. LE L, AIKAT J, JEFFAY K, et al. Differential congestion notification: taming the elephants [A]. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP 2004 [C]. Berlin, Germany, 2004. 118-128.
26. PAXSON V, ALMES G, MAHDAVI J, et al. RFC 2330: Framework for IP Performance Metrics [S]. 1998.
27. ZHANG Y B, LEI Z M. A passive RTT estimate algorithm for TCP [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2004, 27(5): 85-89.
28. LANCE R, FROMMER I. Round-trip time inference via passive monitoring [A]. SIGMETRICS, 2005 [C]. 2005.
29. JIANG H, DOVROLIS C. passive estimation of TCP round-trip times [A]. SIGCOMM2002 [C]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2002.
30. ELTETO T, MOLNAR S. On the distribution of round-trip delays in TCP/IP networks [A]. Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Local Computer Networks [C]. 1999. 172-181.
31. http://www.caida.org/data/monitors/passive-equinix-chicago.xml, 2012 [EB/OL].