Genetic dissection of growth traits in a Chinese indigenous × commercial broiler chicken cross

BMC Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Sheng, Zheya ^a,b   Pettersson, Mats E ^b   Hu, Xiaoxiang ^a   Luo, Chenglong ^c   Qu, Hao ^c   Shu, Dingming ^c   Shen, Xia ^b   Carlborg, Örjan ^b   Li, Ning ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding   (China)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Growth; Indigenous chicken; QTL; SNP chip

Indexed keywords

UBIQUITIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BREED; BROILER; CHICKEN; CHINESE; CHROMOSOME; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; CROSS BREEDING; EPISTASIS; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC TRAIT; GROWTH; GROWTH RATE; NATIVE SPECIES; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOMICS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 84874510593     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-151     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ding HB, Xu RJ, Chen GA. The comparison of meat quality between Chinese indigenous chicken and broiler. Anim Husb Vet Med 2000, 32:16-18.
2. Tang H, Gong YZ, Wu CX, Jiang J, Wang Y, Li K. Variation of meat quality traits among five genotypes of chicken. Poult Sci 2009, 88(10):2212-8. 10.3382/ps.2008-00036, 19762878.
3. Zhao GP, Cui HX, Liu RR, Zheng MQ, Chen JL, Wen J. Comparison of breast muscle meat quality in 2 broiler breeds. Poult Sci 2011, 90(10):2355-9. 10.3382/ps.2011-01432, 21934020.
4. Jacobsson L, Park HB, Wahlberg P, Fredriksson R, Perez-Enciso M, Siegel PB, Andersson L. Many QTLs with minor additive effects are associated with a large difference in growth between two selection lines in chickens. Genet Res Camb 2005, 86(2):115-25.
5. Minvielle F, Kayang BB, Inoue-Murayama M, Miwa M, Vignal A, Gourichon D, Neau A, Monvoisin JL, Ito S. Microsatellite mapping of QTL affecting growth, feed consumption, egg production, tonic immobility and body temperature of Japanese quail. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:87. 10.1186/1471-2164-6-87, 1180434, 15941487.
6. Wahlberg P, Carlborg T, Foglio M, Tordoir X, Syvänen AC, Lathrop M, Gut IG, Siegel PB, Andersson L. Genetic analysis of an F2 intercross between two chicken lines divergently selected for body-weight. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:248. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-248, 2695486, 19473501.
7. Ankra-Badu GA, Shriner D, Bihan-Duval EL, Mignon-Grasteau S, Pitel F, Beaumont C, Duclos MJ, Simon J, Porter TE, Vignal A, Cogburn LA, Allison DB, Yi N, Aggrey SE. Mapping main, epistatic and sex-specific QTL for body composition in a chicken population divergently selected for low or high growth rate. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:107. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-107, 2830984, 20149241.
8. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, O'Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TP, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5350. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350, 2669730, 19390634.
9. Ramos AM, Crooijmans RPMA, Affara NA, Amaral AJ, Archibald AL, Beever JE, Bendixen C, Churcher C, Clark R, Dehais P, Hansen MS, Hedegaard J, Hu Z-L, Kerstens HH, Law AS, Megens H-J, Milan D, Nonneman DJ, Rohrer GA, Rothschild MF, Smith TPL, Schnabel RD, Van Tassell CP, Taylor JF, Wiedmann RT, Schook LB, Groenen MAM. Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS One 2009, 4:e6524. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006524, 2716536, 19654876.
10. Groenen MA, Megens HJ, Zare Y, Warren WC, Hillier LW, Crooijmans RP, Vereijken A, Okimoto R, Muir WM, Cheng HH. The development and characterization of a 60K SNP chip for chicken. BMC Genomics 2011, 12(1):274. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-274, 3117858, 21627800.
11. Carlborg T, Haley CS. Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies?. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(8):618-25. 10.1038/nrg1407, 15266344.
12. Steiner CC, Weber JN, Hoekstra HE. Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes. PLoS Biol 2008, 6(2):e36.
13. Noguera JL, Rodríguez C, Varona L, Tomàs A, Muñoz G, Ramírez O, Barragán C, Arqué M, Bidanel JP, Amills M, Ovilo C, Sánchez A. A bi-dimensional genome scan for prolificacy traits in pigs shows the existence of multiple epistatic QTL. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:636. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-636, 2812473, 20040109.
14. Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Corneti S, Ortega JLA, Salem MB, Bort J, DeAmbrogio E, Moral LFG, Demontis A, El-Ahmed A, Maalouf F, Machlab H, Martos V, Moragues M, Motawaj J, Nachit M, Nserallah N, Ouabbou H, Royo C, Slamaand A, Tuberosa R. Quantitative Trait Loci for Grain Yield and Adaptation of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Across a Wide Range of Water Availability. Genetics 2008, 178(1):489-511. 10.1534/genetics.107.077297, 2206097, 18202390.
15. Malmberg RL, Held S, Mauricio AWR. Epistasis for Fitness-Related Quantitative Traits in Arabidopsis thaliana Grown in the Field and in the Greenhouse. Genetics 2005, 171(4):2013-2027. 10.1534/genetics.105.046078, 1456117, 16157670.
16. Carlborg T, Kerje S, Schütz K, Jacobsson L, Jensenand P, Andersson L. A Global Search Reveals Epistatic Interaction Between QTL for Early Growth in the Chicken. Genome Res 2003, 13(3):413-421. 10.1101/gr.528003, 430275, 12618372.
17. Carlborg T, Hocking PM, Burt DW, Haley CS. Simultaneous mapping of epistatic QTL in chickens reveals clusters of QTL pairs with similar genetic effects on growth. Genet Res 2004, 83(3):197-209. 10.1017/S0016672304006779, 15462413.
18. Beavis WD, In Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy 1998, 145-162. New York: CRC press: 1st edition. Edited by Paterson AH, In Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits.
19. Xu SZ. Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect. Genetics 2003, 165(4):2259-2268. 1462909, 14704201.
20. National Center for Biotechnology Information [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/], National Center for Biotechnology Information.
21. KEGG Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes http://www.genome.jp/kegg/, KEGG.
22. Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Proteolytic Pathway: Destruction for the Sake of Construction. Physiol Rev 2002, 82(2):373-428.
23. Marmor MD, Skaria KB, Yarden Y. Signal transduction and oncogenesis by ErbB/HER receptors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 58(3):903-13. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.06.002, 14967450.
24. Nitzan Z, Ben-Avraham G, Zoref Z, Nir I. Growth and development of the digestive organs and some enzymes in broiler chicks after hatching. Br Poult Sci 1991, 32:515-23. 10.1080/00071669108417376, 1716507.
25. Lilja C, Marks HL. Changes in organ growth pattern associated with long-term selection for high growth rate in quail. Growth Dev Aging 1991, 55(4):219-24.
26. Chicken QTLdb http://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/GG/index, Chicken QTLdb.
27. Xie L, Luo C, Zhang C, Zhang R, Tang J, Nie Q, Ma L, Hu X, Li N, Yang D, Zhang X. Genome-Wide Association Study Identified a Narrow Chromosome 1 Region Associated with Chicken Growth Traits. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(2):e30910. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030910, 3281030, 22359555.
28. Uemoto Y, Sato S, Odawara S, Nokata H, Oyamada Y, Taguchi Y, Yanai S, Sasaki O, Takahashi H, Nirasawa K, Kobayashi E. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting growth and carcass traits in F2 intercross chickens. Poult Sci 2009, 88(3):477-82. 10.3382/ps.2008-00296, 19211515.
29. Liu X, Li H, Wang S, Hu X, Gao Y, Wang Q, Li N, Wang Y, Zhang H. Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Body Weight and Abdominal Fat Weight on Chicken Chromosome One. Poult Sci 2007, 86(6):1084-89.
30. Rouzic AL, Álvarez-Castro JM, Carlborg T. Dissection of the Genetic Architecture of Body Weight in Chicken Reveals the Impact of Epistasis on Domestication Traits. Genetics 2008, 179(3):1591-9. 10.1534/genetics.108.089300, 2475757, 18622035.
31. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2011, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL, http://www.R-project.org, R Development Core Team.
32. Green P, Fallsand K, Crooks S. CRI-MAP Documentation version 2.4 1990, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO: Cri-Map improved version is downloaded from, http://www.animalgenome.org/tools/share/crimap.
33. Groenen M, Wahlberg P, Foglio M, Cheng MH, Megens HJ, Crooijmans R, Besnier F, Lathrop M, Muir WM, Wong GKS, Gutand I, Andersson L. A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res 2009, 19(3):510-519. 2661806, 19088305.
34. Haley CS, Knott SA, Elsen JM. Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci in Crosses between Outbred Lines Using Least Squares. Genetics 1994, 136(3):1195-1207. 1205874, 8005424.
35. Crooks L, Nettelblad C, Carlborg O. An Improved Method for Estimating Chromosomal Line Origin in QTL Analysis of Crosses Between Outbred Lines. G3 2011, 1(1):57-64. 2011, 3276116, 22384318.
36. Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical Threshold Values for Quantitative Trait Mapping. Genetics 1994, 138(3):963-971. 1206241, 7851788.